Monday, November 13, 2017

Museum of the souls of purgatory Rome




The Souls In Purgatory : an excerpt from Fabienne Guerrero’s My Testimony and her after life visions

For Discernment: The Souls In Purgatory


See Explanation. Clicking on the picture will download the highest resolution version available.
[This is an excerpt from Fabienne Guerrero’s My Testimony and her afterlife visions, for discernment]:
Many souls fall into hell unfortunately at the hour of their death… Had they confessed to a priest, they may have been in purgatory or in Heaven, but not in hell.
Before Confession, I heard my soul say: “I am in the bottom of the abyss.” After I confessed I heard: “I am in the bottom of purgatory.”
Jesus explained to me that, although the sins were erased, I have to make reparation as long as I am on the earth. Otherwise, I would have had to make reparation in purgatory. He made me see the suffering of my soul in purgatory as it would expiated the sins of the flesh that I had committed. As well, I heard: “Expiation of the sin of the flesh.” In my soul I felt the torture inflicted by the demons; they were furious that I had abandoned them.
I accepted these sufferings in a spirit of humility and of reparation. I asked God’s Grace for support for what I was to expiate.
What shame it was for me to see in my interior that it was Satan who inflicted impurities on my own body. As a lover of sexual pleasure, my soul began to cry and regret it profusely. But I had to make reparation. I who loved mini-skirts to show my bosom, here is my body now in gehenna. In order to maintain a beautiful body I would go on diets, do body building, enjoy sauna and the jacuzzi. I even went for plastic surgery…
My soul found itself with both hands hanging on a wall.
I saw that my soul had the same shape as that of my earthly body.
I was in what seemed to be a huge grotto. Everything was dark. Suddenly great waves of brilliant light descended into the place where I was.
Above me was purgatory, with very high flames. The souls that were in this state of purification were all united to the Divine Will. Their greatest suffering is not yet seeing God face to Face.
They saw Him, on their particular judgment, in a light that is not yet that of Heaven and have therefore kept a great yearning for God, but they do not wish to appear before Him with their blemishes.
They are being purified and they make amends for that for which they did not make amends on the earth, and many of them learn how to love.
So I pray for them and in turn, they pray for the wretched one that I am and together, in the communion of saints, we help each other to be enlightened so that we can approach God without fear and without blemish.
The souls in purgatory became my beloved sisters, but I do not speak to them because God does not allow it. I simply pray so that they can help me in my mission of evangelization.
I saw many white steps that I quickly climbed and upon arriving at the top of the white staircase, a man dressed in red opened the door and then removed himself quickly.
Right then I entered into an ocean of peace where I felt a very strong Presence of God the Father. He is the Source. He is a benevolent Father, filled with love and peace. His Presence overwhelmed this ocean of peace.
God the Father is very mild and loving and He told me without my being able to see Him: “I am a Father full of love for my children,” “Do not sin.”
I who only believed that God was a very severe Father, finally became conscious of His great holiness. Even if God is love, mercy, and justice, His greatest attribute is that mercy. He said: “God is the Father.” “So I call Him: ‘Father of Love,'” “Dear Father,” and I thrust myself into His Arms of love. And then I followed the path of spiritual childhood. 
God is Love as the apostle Saint John taught us. God thinks only of healing us and nursing our wounds.
http://spiritdaily.org/blog/afterlife/the-souls-in-purgatory

Polish traditionalists handicapped : Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake

The books of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre are obsolete.It's unbelievable for many traditionalists.The Archbishop made a theological mistake. The SSPX has had it wrong all these years.This is not a pleasant thing to write about.
The LG- 16-is-visible mistake is all over the Internet on traditionalist websites including that of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX).This is the Arian- like heresy in the Catholic Church today.It is common.
Interpreting Vatican Council II with LG 16 referring to visible instead of invisible cases was easy.It is easy also for Bishop Schneider. Let's have Bishop Schneider state that all Muslims in Kazakhstan, need to convert with 'faith and baptism'(AG 7) to avoid Hell, Lumen Gentium 16( invincible ignorance) is not an exception and this is Vatican Council II for him.He does not state this in his interviews when he has been informed many times.He simply has to say that LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 7 etc refer to hypothetical cases only. The rest is understood.
Let him say that the interpretation of Vatican Council II has changed.
Vatican Council II now supports the past ecclesiology of an ecumenism of return.Upon this ecclesiology was based the teachings on the Social Reign of Christ the King and the non separation of Church and State.In the interview in Poland this was not stated.
Presently the Polish Catholic Government is handicapped. Since the Polish Bishops Conference, like Bishop Schneider, are affirming LG 16 as an exception to Feeneyite EENS.So there is an exception to the old ecclesiology of the Church known in Poland over the centuries.
Catholic political parties without the help of conservative bishops now have to educate Catholics on how the writings of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and other traditionalists  have an error.It is the same error repeated by the liberals and the Masons.They assume BOD, BOB and I.I are practical exceptions to the dogma EENS.So a new false theology is created. It is shared by traditionalists and liberals.
Catholic political parties must help Catholics reject the leftist ideology which is from Satan. The Left is from Satan.Now in general we can judge the tree by its fruits.But the present two popes, for whatever reason,  have aligned themselves with the political Left.
Catholic political parties which affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation must not only begin their events with prayer, but also reiterate Catholic teaching interpreted without  the common false premise( invisible cases of the baptism of desire are visible in 2017) and conclusion( and so there are exceptions to all needing to be incorporated into the Church as members in the present times).
Traditionalists need to re-read the books on Vatican Council II which they are familiar with - and note the people-in-Heaven-are-visible-on-earth-error.
Also note that Bishop Fellay would say that he affirms the Syllabus of Errors but we also know that he affirms the New Theology, the New Ecclesiology, with exceptions to EENS. He endorses the Letter of the Holy Office's interpretation of EENS.So there are exceptions to EENS for him and when there are exceptions to EENS it is a negation of the old ecclesiology. When the old ecclesiology is negated the Syllabus of Errors on ecumenism and non Christians religions and salvation, is negated.It is the same with Archbishop Guido Pozzo, Secretary of Ecclesia Dei.
Fellay and Pozzo,  both interpret EENS and Vatican Council II with the irrational premise( invisible cases are known people in the present times saved outside the Church).
They both have been informed and yet they continue as before. It is a deception like Pope Francis' moto proprio which tells us that there are saints outside the Church and the pope will officially recognize them.For Pope Francis and Bishop Fellay theologically there is known salvation outside the Church.
Bishop Fellay was silent on the Vatican Document on the Jews.We know that for him  that there is known salvation outside the Church and this would include the Jews.
Bishop Fellay and Pope Francis have violated the Principle of Non Contradiction in their interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS.They infer that unseen people are seen. This is objectively wrong. .
For me Vatican Council II ( premise-free) says that most people on earth are on the way to Hell since they die without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7,LG 14).Catholics are the new people of God, the Chosen People(NA 4), they have the Jewish Messiah promised by the Jewish Prophets and for whom ancient Israel was waiting .There are only Catholics in Heaven. Even Abraham and Moses had to wait until the coming of the Messiah before they could be taken up to Heaven from their waiting place.
If a Protestant is saved, as Michael Voris, would say, then in Heaven he is a Catholic.But Michael does not say that we would not know about it on earth.So it cannot be an example of known salvation outside the Church. This is the mistake the SSPX bishops and priests make.The error is supported by the writings of Archbishop Lefebvre and lay men like Christopher Ferrara, Roberto dei Mattei.Nicholas Gruner, John Vennari etc.In the past good apologists also made the same error for example Fr. John Hardon,Mons.Joseph Fenton, Fr.William Most.
Once they correct this error the SSPX could tell Archbishop Guido Pozzo that they affirm Vatican Council II( premise free). So Vatican Council II is no more an issue for canonical status.
They could inform Bishop Charles Morerod , the bishop of Switzerland that they affirm Vatican Council II( premise-free) so they meet the doctrinal requirements he set for them being allowed to use the churches in general on Sundays for Mass.
They could tell the Polish Government and Bishops that Vatican Council II does not contradict the Church's teachings on Muslims and Jews, as it was known to St. Stanislaus Kotska and St. Maximillian Kolbe.In Poland they could call for the non separation of Church and State since the priority for all going to Heaven is membership in the Catholic Church.This is affirmed (AG 7, LG 14) and not changed by Vatican Council II.
They can ask the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to also ask other religious communities like the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at St. Benedict Center,Still River, to affirm Vatican Council II, without the irrational premise like they do, and then be given canonical status in the diocese of Worcester, USA and elsewhere. This should also apply to new religious communities in England and Germany who attend the Novus Ordo Mass.The Vatican Council II-requirement should not only apply to those who attend the Tridentine Rite Mass.
The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary,St.Benedict Center, Still River which last month was given granted canonical status negate the dogma EENS( Feeneyite) with Vatican Council II interpreted with the premise.
-Lionel Andrades


NOVEMBER 12, 2017


Protesters: 'Catholic Poland, not secular'

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/protesters-catholic-poland-not-secular.html



NOVEMBER 12, 2017


No denial from Dr.Robert Fastiggi or the Society of St.Pius X : all agree invisible people are not visible exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/no-denial-from-drrobert-fastiggi-or.html


NOVEMBER 11, 2017


No denial from SSPX : Books of Archbishop Lefebvre are obsolete now : so are the writings on Vatican Council II by Chris Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/no-denial-books-of-archbishop-lefebvre.html

Where is Bishop Athansius Schneider?

There have been so many posts on this blog  specifically for Bishop Athanasius Schneider and I have e-mailed them to him.There is no response. He must realize that he is using the new theology; the new ecclesiology to interpret Vatican Council II, extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and other magisterial documents.
The New Theology has been built over invisible for us baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) being visible exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus( premise free).This is his theological mistake.
So when he reads Vatican Council II he is not aware of his error.He reads for example UR 3 and then infers that there are known people saved in imperfect communion with the Church. So for him Vatican Council II (UR 3) would be saying there are known Protestants, for example, who are saved outside the Catholic Church.So UR 3, is an example for him of an exception extra ecclesiam nulla salus( without the premise); Feeneyite EENS.So outside the Church there is salvation is his new theology.
Officially he affirms the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which assumes invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. So he is politically correct with the Left. He has no problems with the Vatican.
So if I would meet him I would not be able to have a normal conversation with him.Since in his mind it is ingrained that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known people saved outside the Church-Lionel Andrades




AUGUST 22, 2017

Image result for Photo of Bishop Athanasius Schneider

Bishop Athanasius Schneider is part of the Arian heresy and he does not know ithttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-is-part-of.html