Bishop Donald Sanborn did not know that the Council could be interpreted without the false premise and inference

For Epiphany this year Bishop Donald Sanborn has given a homily ( See Youtube) saying it is important to follow the truth and to speak yet. Yet he will not admit that there are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance which he knows of and neither is it known to any one else in 2019 or over the last 50 years.

Neither does Vatican Council II mentioned any one saved outside the Catholic Church according to LG 8, LG 14, LG 16,GS 22, UR 3, etc.Since they are all hypothetical cases.

So he made an objective and factual mistake all these years on Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

The same mistake has been made on line  by Prof. Robert Fastiggi, at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit, whom Bishop Sanborn debated on the subject of Ecclesiology( See Youtube).

Sanborn's Anti-Feeneyite Catechism is still on line in which he assumes that the baptism of desire, is an exception to Feeneyite EENS.

Many times he has been informed about his error and he does not apologize to the St. Benedict Centers,for maligning them and Fr. Leonard Feeney.He could only criticize Fr. Leonard Feeney  by using a false premise, mixing up what is invisible as being visible, hypothetical as being objectively known and non existing people as being practical exceptions to all needing faith and baptism in the Catholic Church for salvation(AG 7,Vatican Council II).

One of the reasons he went into sedevacantism, is because he wrongly assumed that Vatican Council II was a rupture ( with the false premise and inference) to the past exclusive ecclesiology of the Church.He did not know that the Council could be interpreted without the false premise and inference. Now that he has been informed he will not admit his mistake.Other sedevacantists like the Dimond Brothers at the Most Holy Family Monastery, Bishop Mark Pivaranus,bishop of the sedevacantis religious community CMRI( Congregatio Mariae Regina Immaculatae).

Similarly bloggers Ann Barnhardt and Louie Verrecchio who do not accept Pope Francis as pope and believe he is in mortal sin make the same mistake as Bishop Sanborn.It is a mortal sin of faith,for Verrechio and Barnhardt to change the understanding of EENS and the Nicene Creed, with the use of a false premise and inference.The same error is repeated by David Domet at his blog Vox Cantoris.

Lionel Andrades

APRIL 3, 2019

Bishop Donald Sanborn still interprets Vatican Council II and EENS with an irrationality : then he slanders Fr.Leonard Feeney instead of apologizing

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/04/bishop-donald-sanborn-is-still.html

Pro abortion women could note that Fr.Shehan Boquet, President, Human Light International, USA is politically incorrect with the Left on abortion and contraception but not on salvation and Catholic faith.

 

Pro abortion women could note that Fr.Shehan Boquet, President, Human Light International, USA is politically incorrect with the Left on abortion and contraception but not on salvation and Catholic faith.1

Today morning, Friday, Fr.Boquet's Holy Mass was probably aired on EWTN and he cannot simply say the obvious : that we cannot meet or see someone saved in invincible ignorance (I.I), baptism of desire(BOD) and baptism of blood(BOB).Even a non Catholic can say the answer is No we cannot physically see people saved in Heaven.

Since there are no cases of I.I,BOD, BOB in our reality, they cannot be examples of salvation outside the Church.So they are not exceptions to EENS.Again he will not say that they are not exceptions to EENS.

But the Left expects Fr.Boquet to say that there are exceptions and to reject the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation, as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.

So while he opposes the Left on abortion he supports them on salvation( faith).

Pro abortion groups could notice an inconsistency.

The teachings of the Catholic Church do not change for me even when popes teach error on faith and morals.Since we always follow the past Magisterium, Sacred Tradition and the Bible.

Over the centuries the popes and saints affirmed the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).They knew that BOD, BOB and I.I could only be hypothetical cases for us human beings.However liberal theologians bought an innovation into the Catholic Church in a big way with the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.The writers of the Letter assumed invisible people were visible.Unknown non Catholics saved outside the Church were known.So they concluded that there was salvation outside the Church.

This became the New Theology.It was based upon a philosophical error.Since there were no empirical cases of salvation outside the Church. It was 'observed' that there were exceptions.So upon this error the ecclesiastics accepted a new theology -outside the Church there is salvation.

It was accepted at Vatican Council II by Fr. Karl Rahner sj and Fr. Joseph Ratzinger.The new teaching would contribute to the New World Order and so ecclesiastical Masonry would have accepted it.

As Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Cardinal Ratzinger supported the false narrative on salvation.It is supported today by Pope Francis and the cardinals and bishops.

Cardinal Donald Wuerl as head of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee, told Fr. Peter C.Phan that BOD, BOB and I.I were exceptions to the traditional teaching on the Church have an exclusiveness in salvation.A Notification was issued by the USCCB to the Vietnamese priest.Neither Wuerl or Phan would affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.

BISHOP KEVIN RHOADES

Even Bishop Kevin Rhoades the present Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee mistakes BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, as being exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.He repeated this same error some eight years back in the flap with Robert Sungenis.Jim Likoudis and Catholics United for the Faith supported Rhoades. Invisible people were visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS for all of them. 

So yesterday Fr. Bouqet would not answer two questions which indicate there is no salvation outside the Church and EENS was never contradicted.There is no rational basis for his new theology. EENS was an infallible , faith-teaching, defined by three Church Councils.If the popes can change this teaching once they can do so also a second time and revert to the original.

The present interpretation of Bishop Kevin Rhoades,is based upon an error.So it is not Magisterial since the Holy Spirit cannot make a mistake.

So it is a falsehood and a deception which Fr. Bouquet and Fr. Francesco Giordano at HLI support.It is a scandal for a priest.Since the error is known in public.He has not issued a clarification or apology.For him all non Catholics in general are not oriented to Hell, unless they convert into the Catholic Church, since there are exceptions.

Fr. Francesco Giordano, Director, HLI, Rome,continues to teach at the University of St. Thomas Aquinas(Angelicum), Rome that there are exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
BOD,BOB and I.I refer to personally known people for him too.
He also interprets Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally, i.e invisible people are objective exceptions to all needing to enter the Catholic Church with faith and baptism.Fr.Shehan Boquet supports all this.There are no objections from the HLI apologists Raymond de Souza and Brian Clowes.-Lionel Andrades


 1

April 4, 2019

No denial from Fr.Shehan Boquet, President, Human Life International : unethical and deceptive : PR office responds 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/04/no-denial-from-frshehan-boquet.html

September 23, 2018

Things are so bad on doctrine and theology in the Catholic Church that the new Chairman of the United States Catholic Conference of Bishops(USCCB) cannot deny what I have written

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/things-are-so-bad-on-doctrine-and.html

September 24, 2018

Bishop Kevin Rhoades, the new Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committe has made a doctrinal mistake (Graphics)

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/bishop-kevin-rhoades-new-chairman-of_24.html

 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2018

LUMEN GENTIUM 8 AND BOD,BOB AND I.I ARE HYPOTHETICAL AND THEORETICAL AND ARE NOT EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA EENS. YET FOR BISHOP KEVEN RHOADES THEY ARE EXCEPTIONS.THIS IS A BIG MISTAKE OF THE USCCB DOCTRINAL COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN HTTP://EUCHARISTANDMISSION.BLOGSPOT.COM/2018/09/SO-LUMEN-GENTIUM-8-AND-BODBOB-AND-II.HTML

 

September 22, 2018

Vatican Council II supports traditional EENS and Bishop Kevin Rhoades, like Cardinal Donald Wuerl and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, cannot say it

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/vatican-council-ii-supports-traditional.html

September 22, 2018

Lumen Gentium 8 and BOD,BOB and I.I are hypothetical and theoretical and are not exceptions to the dogma EENS. Yet for Bishop Keven Rhoades they are exceptions.This is a big mistake of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee Chairman 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/so-lumen-gentium-8-and-bodbob-and-ii.html

SEPTEMBER 21, 2018

Bishop Kevin Rhoades, the new Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee in his radio program makes the same doctrinal error as Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj at the Placuet Deo Press Conference

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/bishop-kevin-rhoades-new-chairman-of.html

SEPTEMBER 21, 2018

When Bishop Kevin Rhoades infers that Lumen Gentium and Nostra Aetate say we know of non Catholics saved outside the Church it is irrational and heretical: Vatican Council II does not contradict traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/when-bishop-kevin-rhoades-infers-that.html

Bishop who interprets Vatican Council II and outside the Church with no salvation with irrational Cushingism instead of traditional Feeneyism is the new Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/bishop-who-interprets-vatican-council.html

SEPTEMBER 16, 2018

Cardinal Donald Wuerl and the USCCB Doctrinal Committee, chaired by Archbishop William E.Lori, made an objective error in the Notification on Fr. Peter C.Phan  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/cardinal-donald-wuerl-and-usccb.html

SEPTEMBER 14, 2018

Vatican Council II says extra ecclesiam nulla salus

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/vatican-council-ii-says-extra-ecclesiam.html

_________________________________________

January 19, 2012

CANON LAWYER IN INDIANA NEEDS TO BE ASKED : IS BISHOP KEVIN RHOADES JURIDICALLY A CATHOLIC ?

Evidence of the Fort Wayne Bend bishops denial of the Catholic Faith is on a website.
Canon Lawyer Fr. Mark Gurtner (Judicial Vicar of the Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend in Indiana) said, it was reported on the internet, that the jurisdiction of the case against Real Catholic TV.com lies in the Indiana diocese whose bishop is Kevin Rhoades.
Continued  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2012/01/canon-lawyer-in-indiana-needs-to-be.html

_____________________________________________