Traditionis Custode - text with comments
APOSTOLIC LETTER
ISSUED "MOTU PROPRIO"
BY THE SUPREME PONTIFF
FRANCIS
«TRADITIONIS CUSTODES»
Guardians of the tradition, the bishops in communion with the Bishop of Rome constitute the visible principle and foundation of the unity of their particular Churches. [1] Under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, through the proclamation of the Gospel and by means of the celebration of the Eucharist, they govern the particular Churches entrusted to them. [2]
Lionel: The bishops are not in unity with the Holy Spirit when they interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents with an Irrational and not Rational Premise. There conclusion has to be heretical and in schism with the past Magisterium.Bishop Roland Minnerath, the former bishop of Dijon, France was not in ecclesial unity with the popes of the past. Since they used only a Rational Premise to interpret Magisterial Documents. Minnerath was using the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so there was a break with the Syllabus of Errors.
__________________
In order to promote the concord and unity of the Church, with paternal solicitude towards those who in any region adhere to liturgical forms antecedent to the reform willed by the Vatican Council II, my Venerable Predecessors, Saint John Paul II and Benedict XVI, granted and regulated the faculty to use the Roman Missal edited by John XXIII in 1962. [3] In this way they intended “to facilitate the ecclesial communion of those Catholics who feel attached to some earlier liturgical forms” and not to others. [4]
Lionel : They were both interpreting Vatican Council II with the False Premise and so had to be in a rupture with the past excluisvist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. They had chosen division. There was only the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition ( Syllabus of Errors etc).Pope John Paul and Cardinal Ratzinger did not tell Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre that Vatican Council II could be interpreted with the Rational Premise and the conclusion would be in support of Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Leftbvre was not informed.
_____________________
In line with the initiative of my Venerable Predecessor Benedict XVI to invite the bishops to assess the application of the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum three years after its publication, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith carried out a detailed consultation of the bishops in 2020. The results have been carefully considered in the light of experience that has matured during these years.
At this time, having considered the wishes expressed by the episcopate and having heard the opinion of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, I now desire, with this Apostolic Letter, to press on ever more in the constant search for ecclesial communion. Therefore, I have considered it appropriate to establish the following:
Lionel: I repeat - there cannot be ecclesiial communion based upon an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.The False Premise creates division in the Church. A rational option is availale.Though it would be the end of theological liberalism.
______________________
Art. 1. The liturgical books promulgated by Saint Paul VI and Saint John Paul II, in conformity with the decrees of Vatican Council II, are the unique expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite.
Lionel : They are not the unique expression of the lex orandi. They are based upon Vatican Council II interpreted with a Fake Premise. It prodiuces a false rupture with the exclusivisit ecclesiology of the Roman Missal (1580).The unique expression is Vatican Council II (1965) interpreted with a Rational and not Irrational Premise. The popes from Paul VI to Francis have not chosen the Rational Premise.The irrational interpretation of the Council will become obsolete. People have a choice.
__________
Art. 2. It belongs to the diocesan bishop, as moderator, promoter, and guardian of the whole liturgical life of the particular Church entrusted to him, [5] to regulate the liturgical celebrations of his diocese. [6] Therefore, it is his exclusive competence to authorize the use of the 1962 Roman Missal in his diocese, according to the guidelines of the Apostolic See.
Lionel : The 1962 Roman Missal is in harmony with the exclusivist ecclesiology of Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise. So this must be the lex credendi.It must be the norm at Mass in all Rites at every liturgy.
__________________
Art. 3. The bishop of the diocese in which until now there exist one or more groups that celebrate according to the Missal antecedent to the reform of 1970:
§ 1. is to determine that these groups do not deny the validity and the legitimacy of the liturgical reform, dictated by Vatican Council II and the Magisterium of the Supreme Pontiffs;
Lionel: The validity of Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise is the only expression of the Holy Spirit. Vatican Council II interpreted with a False Premise cannot be Magisterial.It is human error.
________________
§ 2. is to designate one or more locations where the faithful adherents of these groups may gather for the eucharistic celebration (not however in the parochial churches and without the erection of new personal parishes);
Lionel: The 'faithful adherents of these groups ' must only affirm Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise.So they would be in harmony with the past theology of the Church.The popes and saints over the centuries, before 1949, only used the Rational Premise to interpret Church documents(Creeds, Catechisms etc) and doctrines( baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance etc).
____________________________
§ 3. to establish at the designated locations the days on which eucharistic celebrations are permitted using the Roman Missal promulgated by Saint John XXIII in 1962. [7] In these celebrations the readings are proclaimed in the vernacular language, using translations of the Sacred Scripture approved for liturgical use by the respective Episcopal Conferences;
§ 4. to appoint a priest who, as delegate of the bishop, is entrusted with these celebrations and with the pastoral care of these groups of the faithful. This priest should be suited for this responsibility, skilled in the use of the Missale Romanum antecedent to the reform of 1970, possess a knowledge of the Latin language sufficient for a thorough comprehension of the rubrics and liturgical texts, and be animated by a lively pastoral charity and by a sense of ecclesial communion. This priest should have at heart not only the correct celebration of the liturgy, but also the pastoral and spiritual care of the faithful;
Lionel : Bishops must encourage the faithful to interpret Vatican Council II ( ratiional ) as a continuity with the lex credendi of the past centuries.
With the past exclusivist ecclesiology intact, the faith and moral teachings of the Church of the past, are not contradicted.Vatican Council II interpreted rationally has a continuity with the faith and moral teachings of for example, the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
___
§ 5. to proceed suitably to verify that the parishes canonically erected for the benefit of these faithful are effective for their spiritual growth, and to determine whether or not to retain them;
Lionel: Parishes and groups which do not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and in harmony with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Roman Missal, are not to be encouraged. They do not have the lex orandi, lex credendi of the Catholic Church.It does not change. It is dishonest to choose a False Premise to create a False Break with the past.Pope Francis in Traditionis Custode is officially choosing the False Premise. It was the same with Pope Benedict in Summorum Pontificum.Pope Benedict did not choose the Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with EENS according to the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.
____________________________
§ 6. to take care not to authorize the establishment of new groups.
Art. 4. Priests ordained after the publication of the present Motu Proprio, who wish to celebrate using the Missale Romanum of 1962, should submit a formal request to the diocesan Bishop who shall consult the Apostolic See before granting this authorization.
Lionel: The Missale Romanum of 1962 and earlier must still be the norm at Holy Mass. Since the New Missal with its new theology and new ecclesiology, has its foundation in Vatican Council II, irrational.It is the False Premise which creates the New Ecumenism and New Theology.There is no New Ecclesiology with the rational interpretation of the Council.
___________________________
Art. 5. Priests who already celebrate according to the Missale Romanum of 1962 should request from the diocesan Bishop the authorization to continue to enjoy this faculty.
Art. 6. Institutes of consecrated life and Societies of apostolic life, erected by the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, fall under the competence of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies for Apostolic Life.
Art. 7. The Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments and the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, for matters of their particular competence, exercise the authority of the Holy See with respect to the observance of these provisions.
Lionel : They need to follow Vatican Council II ( rational ) and only recommend this interpretation of the Council. To recommend Vatican Council II ( irrational ) would be deceptive.-Lionel Andrades
___________________________
Art. 8. Previous norms, instructions, permissions, and customs that do not conform to the provisions of the present Motu Proprio are abrogated.
Everything that I have declared in this Apostolic Letter in the form of Motu Proprio, I order to be observed in all its parts, anything else to the contrary notwithstanding, even if worthy of particular mention, and I establish that it be promulgated by way of publication in “L’Osservatore Romano”, entering immediately in force and, subsequently, that it be published in the official Commentary of the Holy See, Acta Apostolicae Sedis.
Given at Rome, at Saint John Lateran, on 16 July 2021, the liturgical Memorial of Our Lady of Mount Carmel, in the ninth year of Our Pontificate.
FRANCIS
https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/motu_proprio/documents/20210716-motu-proprio-traditionis-custodes.html
________________________________________
JUNE 26, 2022
Bishops have to permit the Latin Mass only for those who interpret the Council rationally and so support the 1962 Roman Missal: there now are two doctrinal interpretations of Traditionis Custode
DECEMBER 16, 2021
In Traditionis Custode Vatican Council II is interpreted without the Rational Premise
DECEMBER 18, 2021
DECEMBER 19, 2021
Traditionis Custode creates division on the Eucharist it supports sacrilege and scandal when it changes the interpretation of Vatican Council II with a False Premise to produce political liberalism in the Church.
Posts
