Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Statue of Virgin Mary seen 'crying' in Honduran university church leaving worshippers baffled

Priest claims statue of Virgin Mary has started crying

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/statue-virgin-mary-seen-crying-8734478

Priest claims statue of Virgin Mary has started crying

http://spiritdaily.org/blog/uncategorized/another-weeping-statue


The Bible Reading at Holy Mass today : Jesus stood over her, rebuked the fever, and it left her. She got up immediately and waited on them.

Gospel

After Jesus left the synagogue, he entered the house of Simon.
Simon’s mother-in-law was afflicted with a severe fever,
and they interceded with him about her.
He stood over her, rebuked the fever, and it left her.
She got up immediately and waited on them.


At sunset, all who had people sick with various diseases
brought them to him.
He laid his hands on each of them and cured them.
And demons also came out from many, shouting, “You are the Son of God.”
But he rebuked them and did not allow them to speak
because they knew that he was the Christ.

At daybreak, Jesus left and went to a deserted place.
The crowds went looking for him, and when they came to him,
they tried to prevent him from leaving them.
But he said to them, “To the other towns also
I must proclaim the good news of the Kingdom of God,
because for this purpose I have been sent.”
And he was preaching in the synagogues of Judea.LK 4:38-44

August 31, 2016

Wednesday of the Twenty-Second Week in Ordinary Time
Lectionary: 433
































Liturgy has not preserved the Faith

It is often said that if it was not for Archbishop Lefebvre and the Traditional Latin Mass ( TLM) the Catholic Faith would not exist , as it was known over the centuries.This is not true.There  are the traditionalists, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary( MICM) who attend the TLM with different doctrines.It is not the same as the SSPX on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Then there is the Greek Mass which pre-dates the TLM.The Catholic  priests offer it with the new ecclesiology i.e the baptism of desire is objectively seen and so is a personally known exception to the dogma  EENS(Feeneyite).
Then I attend the TLM and Novus Ordo Mass with the old ecclesiology.The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to invisible cases for me.
So it is the same liturgy but with different doctrines and ecclesiology.The  liturgy does not determine the Faith.The liturgy has not preserved the Faith.
The ecclesiology of Archbishop Lefebvre seems confused.He supports Tradition according to the saints and popes and also negates Tradition according to the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 of Pope Pius XII and the popes who followed him.He supports EENS( Feeneyite) according to the pre-Council of Trent magisterium but also supports EENS ( Cushingite) according to the post Council of Trent magisterium.Fr.Francois Laisney of the SSPX criticizes EENS( Feeneyite) while the 2012 SSPX General Chapter Statement supports it.
Today when Cardinal Raymond Burke for example, offers Holy Mass ad orientem it is a rupture with the TLM ecclesiology of the 16th century missionaries.
If he rejected the second part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and accepted only the first part he would return to the old ecclesiology. He would be saying hypothetical cases are just hypothetical.He returns to the old 16th century ecclesiology of the missionaries which Pope Benedict XVI rejected recently. The popes interpret hypothetical cases in Vatican Council II as being personally known and so are exceptions to EENS( Feeneyite).
Cardinal Raymond Burke has to make a simple switch  mentally and recognise that hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are always theoretical for us, accepted in principle,in good faith, speculatively.
He has to recognise that Vatican Council II has made a mistake indirectly when it supposes hypothetical cases are not hypothetical.It made a mistake directly when it mentions being saved with the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance. This should not have been there in the text of AG 7 and LG 16.Since it is a reference to non existing people in our reality.The baptism of desire etc is not relevant to all needing 'faith and baptism' for salvation(AG 7).
So Church doctrine, ecclesiology was not changed when Pope Paul VI offered the first Mass in Italian.Since in his mind ecclesiology could still have been the same for him.
I attend Mass with EENS( Feeneyite), Vatican Council II( Feneyite-no known exceptions to EENS), the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite-hypothetical cases are not objectively known), Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite-there is one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins and not three),Letter of the Holy Office 1949( Feeneyite-first part of the Letter), ecumemism of return( Feeneyite-since there is no known salvation outside the Church), inter-religious dialogue ( Feeneyite-outside the Church there is no salvation), Social Reign of Christ the King ( Feeneyite-since outside the Church there is no salvation), the non separation of Church and State( Feeneyite-since outside the Church there is no salvation),eschatology( Feeneyite-there are only Catholics in Heaven since outside the Church there is no salvation) and the old ecclesiology( Feeneyite-based on EENS Feeneyite).
For Cardinal Burke, Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Bishop Bernard Fellay it is the opposite. They offer Holy Mass with EENS(Cushingite), Vatican Council II( Cushingite-there are known exceptions to EENS), the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite-hypothetical cases are objectively known in 2016), Nicene Creed ( Cushingite-there is not one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins but three or more ),Letter of the Holy Office 1949( Cushingite-second part of the Letter is accepted which contradicts the first part), ecumemism of return( Cushingite-this ecumenism is rejected since allegedly there is known salvation outside the Church,there is the Anonymous Christian).It is the new ecumenism for them.For them inter-religious dialogue is Cushingite- since outside the Church there is known salvation.The  Social Reign of Christ the King  is Cushingite-since outside the Church there is known salvation.The  non separation of Church and State is the result of Cushingism since outside the Church there is known salvation.Eschatology is  Cushingite-there are not only Catholics in Heaven but non Catholics too, since outside the Church there is salvation.Ecclesiology is Cushingite-based on EENS Cushingite.-Lionel Andrades

Tuesday, August 30, 2016

Bible Reading at Holy Mass today : Jesus rebuked him and said, “Be quiet! Come out of him!” Then the demon threw the man down in front of them and came out of him without doing him any harm

Gospel

Jesus went down to Capernaum, a town of Galilee.
He taught them on the sabbath,
and they were astonished at his teaching
because he spoke with authority.
In the synagogue there was a man with the spirit of an unclean demon, 
and he cried out in a loud voice,
“What have you to do with us, Jesus of Nazareth?
Have you come to destroy us?
I know who you are–the Holy One of God!”
Jesus rebuked him and said, “Be quiet! Come out of him!”
Then the demon threw the man down in front of them
and came out of him without doing him any harm.
They were all amazed and said to one another,
“What is there about his word?
For with authority and power he commands the unclean spirits,
and they come out.”

And news of him spread everywhere in the surrounding region.

LK 4:31-37
August 30,2016 Tuesday














This is doctrinal rebellion at Lake Garda. This is liberalism. It is modernism.This is the hermeneutic of rupture.It is a doctrinal mess and it is supported annually by the traditionalists.

It will be another conference with the same doctrinal mistakes next year.They are obliged to make them.It is pro- SSPX, politically correct and  no one expects anything different.There will more of the same New Theology at Lake Garda and Chris Ferrrara will ask how is the SSPX not affirming the doctrines and teachings of the Church? He will repeat that the SSPX is not saying anything new.
He will not respond. They will not respond even when it is repeatedly pointed out to them that the SSPX's interpretation of magisterial documents is with the innovative New Theology, an irrational theology based on an irrational philosophy.Or they act as if they do not understand.
They will cite Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis, Quanta Cura etc on the baptism of desire etc always inferring that the baptism of desire refers not to hypothetical cases.
They can only see the baptism of desire with the New Theology.
Hypothetical cases which do not exist in our time and space  are explicit  exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).Nothing new.This was the understanding of the Hildrebrands,Michael Davis, Archbishop Lefebvre and Pope Pius XII's Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
Directly, they will not affirm EENS( Feeneyite).Since it will put them in opposition to the Jewish Left.So Chris Ferrara and others do not say that they are Feeneyites.Then there are no Leftist legal threats.
So at Lake Garda they will issue another statement in 2017 complaining about the magisterium not affirming the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.While they themself will theologically reject this teaching.
They will mention the dogma EENS( Feeneyite) while they themself reject it with Cushingism.
They will note the errors of the Vatican Curia, when they themself also use the irrational theology.
They will decry the new ecumenism, while not pointing out that Cushingism is its foundation, and it is Cushingism which is their  staple theology as it is for the SSPX.
Welcome to Lake Garda  next year for the annual hypocrisy.
This will be a comfortable time to relax and imbibe the poltically correct philosophy and theology of the 2016 signatories of the Lake Garda Statement.
As usual there will be Mass in Latin.It will not be the  Tridentine one.Mass in Latin, like Italian and English, has a new  ecclesiology.It is based on EENS( Cushingism).It is obviously a rupture with past- EENS ( Feeneyite) and the Syllabus of Errors.
The priest will offer Holy Mass Ad Orientem and assume there is salvation outside the Church.So thelogically there is salvation for Protestant.Holy Mass has the Anonymous Christian theology, based on known salvation outside the Church.It is the same with the Novus Ordo Mass.At Lake Garda there will be another type of Novus Ordo- Latin Mass, approved by the Vatican.It will have the old liturgy and traditional vestments with a new understanding of Church expressed in EENS( Cushingite), Nicene Creed( Cushingite), Letter of the Holy Office 1949( Cushingite), Catechism of the Catholic Church( Cushingite), Social Reign of Christ the King ( Cushingite), New Ecumenism ( Cushingite), inter-religious dialogue( Cushingite), a separation of Church and State since there is Cushingite salvation outside the Church...
This is doctrinal rebellion at Lake Garda. This is liberalism. It is modernism.This is the hermeneutic of rupture.
It is a doctrinal mess and it is supported annually by the traditionalists at their conference in Lake Garda.
-Lionel Andrades



August 29, 2016


Monday, August 29, 2016

There is salvation outside the Church for the Lake Garda Statement signatories.It is the same for the contemporary magisterium and the Church at large. So for example, why should the LCWR Sisters seek first the Kingdom of God and his justice within the Catholic Church ? They could also seek it in Buddhism or Hinduism.The theology is approved by the traditionalists

The Lake Garda Statement-Dr.John Rao
But the truth is that the Catholic Church, which is the Mystical Body of Christ, is the renewal of humanity, a renewal made possible only by the translation of fallen men into the state of sanctifying grace and the consequent elevation of human society to heights it could never attain by any purely human effort. Thus it is the world that is obliged to contribute to the work of the Church. Yet we witness with amazement a historically sudden inversion of the proper order of things in the Church’s approach to her mission in human society.
Whither the Social Kingship of Christ?
With all of these considerations in view, we must ask: What has happened to the Church’s certitude concerning her exclusive and divinely ordained role in the right ordering of human affairs and the fostering of true brotherhood among men? Have the Church’s leaders forgotten that her founder is God Incarnate? Have they somehow misplaced the divine commission to “make disciples of all nations”? Do they still believe the defined dogma that the Church is the sole ark of salvation? Are they still mindful of Our Lord’s warning: “without me you can do nothing”?  Do they no longer have confidence in His promise: “But seek ye first the Kingdom of God, and His justice, and all these things will be added unto you”? 
But the truth is that the Catholic Church, which is the Mystical Body of Christ, is the renewal of humanity,
Lionel:
How can there be a renewal from the Catholic Church since Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 interpreted with Cushingism, indicates there is salvation outside the Church. So all do not need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation. There is salvation in other religions and these cases are known to be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite).This is also the theology of Dr.John Rao and the signatories of the Lake Statement.So why is the Church still needed?
For me there are no known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( EENS), I cannot meet or see any one saved outside the Church.Humanly speaking there could not be any one in the past too, who could see someone saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.So I accept the first part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which supports EENS ( Feeneyite) and reject the second part which supports EENS ( Cushingite-with exceptions).The second part contradicts the first part.
I also interpret Vatican Council II with Feneeyism.There are no known exceptions in Vatican Council II to the dogma EENS( Feeneyite). So for me LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases.They are not a reference to known people in the present times, saved without the baptism of water.
So this is the difference between  Dr. John Rao and me.For him there are exceptions to the old ecclesiology and he supports the new liberal ecclesiology which he indirectly criticises in this Statement.
_____________________________________
a renewal made possible only by the translation of fallen men into the state of sanctifying grace and the consequent elevation of human society to heights it could never attain by any purely human effort. Thus it is the world that is obliged to contribute to the work of the Church.
Lionel:
But the present Church is Cushingite and it is a break with the old ecclesiology which would support 'triumphalism'.The traditionalists  support the new liberal ecclesiology based on Cushingism i.e hypothethical cases must be interpreted as being personally known in the present times, for them to be explicit exceptions to EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors etc.
___________________________________________
 Yet we witness with amazement a historically sudden inversion of the proper order of things in the Church’s approach to her mission in human society.
Lionel:
The Church's approach to mission like that of the signatories of the Lake Garda Statement has changed.They are all now Christocentric without the old exclusivism.The signatories of this Statement are part of the problem.
_____________________________________________

Whither the Social Kingship of Christ?

With all of these considerations in view, we must ask: What has happened to the Church’s certitude concerning her exclusive and divinely ordained role in the right ordering of human affairs and the fostering of true brotherhood among men?
Lionel:
 It has changed with Cushingism.
________________________________________________
 Have the Church’s leaders forgotten that her founder is God Incarnate?
Lionel:
With Cushingism Jesus' Church is not absolutely necessary for salvation.Since there are alleged cases of salvation outside the Church which have their source in God Incarnate.
We do not know who they are and we cannot know who they are but it is speculated that these unknown cases are exceptions to the Church's traditional theology.
________________________________________________
 Have they somehow misplaced the divine commission to “make disciples of all nations”?
Lionel: Why? According to the SSPX website for example, there is known salvation outside the Church. So Feeneyism is condemned.They support the second part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.They also interpret Vatican Council II ( LG 16 etc) as referring to known exceptions to traditional EENS( Feeneyite). So since there is known salvation outside the Church why "make disciples of all nations".Cardinal Ratzinger's New Theology and the Catechism of the Catholic Church suggests non Catholics will be saved through Jesus and the Church ( CCC 846).
_________________________________
Do they still believe the defined dogma that the Church is the sole ark of salvation?
Lionel:
The signatories of the Lake Garda Statement, defacto, in reality, do not accept  the defined dogma which tells us that the Church is the sole ark of salvation.
They may say that they do accept it . However their theology is Cushingite and this is a negation of EENS ( Feeneyite).
Also their interpretation of Vatican Council II,the Catechism of the Catholic Church( 1995), Mystici Corporis ,Quanta Cura and other magisterial documents is with Cushingism, even though a choice is available.
_________________________________ 
Are they still mindful of Our Lord’s warning: “without me you can do nothing”?
Lionel:
According to the Cushingite theology even without membership in the Catholic Church and without knowledge of Jesus a non Catholic can be saved in another religion.This is the basis for the New Theology of Rahner and Ratzinger.It is from here that Rahner gave us his Anonymous Christian theory which Cardinal Ratzinger enforced in the Catholic Church.
Now Ecclesia Dei wants the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II ( Cushingism) which will rubber stamp the New Theology and Rahner's Anonymous Christian :it is the foundation for the new liberal ecumenism.
_________________________________
  Do they no longer have confidence in His promise: “But seek ye first the Kingdom of God, and His justice, and all these things will be added unto you”? 
Lionel:
 There is salvation outside the Church for the Lake Garda Statement signatories.It is the same for the contemporary magisterium and the Church at large. So for example, why should the LCWR Sisters seek first the Kingdom of God and his justice within the Catholic Church ? They could also seek it in Buddhism or Hinduism.The theology is approved by the traditionalists.
-Lionel Andrades
August 27, 2016
This passes of for Catholic philosophical reasoning.It is the philosophical basis of a new Catholic theology.It is accepted by all the signatories of the Lake Garda Statement.There would have been no 'Conciliar changes' without this error http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/this-passes-of-for-catholic.html

Sunday, August 28, 2016

‘THE DOWNLOAD—EUCHARISTIC ADORATION WILL SAVE THE WORLD’



http://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/watch-the-full-show-the-downloadeucharistic-adoration-will-save-the-world

SSPX AGREES WITH ME

Today  morning I went to the SSPX chapel in Rome. The prior and the regular priests were not there.There was a new priest not from Albano who offered Holy Mass.Last week Fr. Aldo Rossi offered  the Mass and he had no comment on my report saying that the SSPX has changed Catholic dogmas and doctrine.It was sent to him and others in Italian and English.It could also be read on the media.
Last Sunday I wrote that I met Fr. Rossi, the SSPX Prior at Albano and he had nothing to say. It's now some three years and even the District Superior, Fr. PierPaolo Petrucci does not want to respond to this issue.Last week I sent them the follow up reports on this blog.
Basically what I have been saying is that :
1) the SSPX and their lay supporters ( Lake Garda Statement signatories) assume hypothetical cases are not hypothetical.Then they interpret Vatican Council II with this irrationality to reach a non traditional conclusion.
2) I assume hypothetical cases are hypothetical and interpret Vatican Council II with this rationality and so reach a traditional conclusion.
Regarding Point One the SSPX will not admit their error and state that they were wrong.
Regarding Point Two the SSPX will not correct me and show me how I am wrong and neither will they admit that I am correct.
If they admit that I am correct and they were wrong then it means that all their theories about Vatican Council II over the last 50 years were wrong.Archbishop Lefebvre along with Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger made an objective mistake.The baptism of desire is a hypothetical case.It is not an objectively known case so it was not relevant to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).The magisterium made a mistake on ' a faith' issue.The SSPX has been supporting the heresy.
Fr. Pierpaulo Petrucci at a conference in Rimini  made an objective mistake when he cited a reference from Vatican Council II, which for him contradicted the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite).
Similarly Bishop Bernard Fellay made the same mistake in a Letter to Friends and Benefactors:It can still be read on line.
I have mentioned this so many times. Why do they not just come out and say,"We were wrong all these years". Why does Chris Ferrara, John Vennari, Michael Matt, John Salza and the others simply say that their interpretation of Vatican Council II is 'now obsolete'.Since their premise and conclusion were wrong.
Once they admit this they are in a position to ask Rome to come back to the Faith.
Ask Rome to interpret Vatican Council II as I do. Or ask Rome to comment on my interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Instead Don Aldo Rossi didn't show up today and if he did he probably would say nothing, out of obedience to Fr. Peirpaolo Petrucci or who knows who.
I know that the SSPX priests agree with me personally.The last three years at their chapel, whenever I go there, they have told me that  there are no known cases of the baptism of desire in the present times. Nothing spectacular. This is common sense."They are invisible cases. This is something obvious", said Fr. Don Rossi.
So they agree that invisible cases cannot be exceptions or relevant to EENS Feeneyite.But how can they admit that Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops made a mistake ?
So the District Superior is saying nothing.Neither is there any written apologetics refuting me in general or point by point.
If in their defense they would say that they are following the contemporary magisterium,I would agree with them and point out that the magisterium is also  making a factual error.We cannot physically see people saved in Heaven with the baptism of desire and then assume that these cases are explicit exceptions on earth in 2016 to all needing faith and baptism for salvation; all needing to be formal and visible members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell.
Even the Auxiliary Bishops in Rome know that the Vatican Curia has made a mistake.They will not comment.I have spoken to officials at the Rome Vicariate's Departments for Ecumenism, Inter-Religious Dilague and Mission.The religious there are perturbed on seeing me and knowing what I have to say.
Bishop Williamson has formed a new traditionalist organisation to accommodate all those who do not want talks with Rome until Rome comes back to the Faith. Bishop Williamson does not realize that he also interprets Vatican Council II with an irrational premise and  conclusion as does Rome and Bishop Fellay.All sides are so fixed in their false doctrinal position.It is as if it is their political position and they cannot budge.Even the traditionalists the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary are being prudent.They will not comment.
-Lionel Andrades

Saturday, August 27, 2016

Ave Maria ( Reiki , marcação a cada 5 min )

This passes of for Catholic philosophical reasoning.It is the philosophical basis of a new Catholic theology.It is accepted by all the signatories of the Lake Garda Statement.There would have been no 'Conciliar changes' without this error

Dr. John Rao lecture: “Even Now the Devastation Is Begun"


Dr. John Rao (shown in the video reading the Lake Garda Statement
http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2016/08/dr-john-rao-lecture-even-now.html#more
Introduction


Only eleven years before the commencement of the Second Vatican Council, Pope Pius XII issued a prophetic admonition. Speaking of the long history of the Church’s members “using every endeavor to convert their fellow citizens to the religion of Jesus Christ and to fashion their morals according to its pattern, so as to safeguard both religion and the state from approaching danger,” Pius XII urged a renewal of missionary activity in the face of the rising specter of a civilizational apostasy and its fatal consequences...
Pius XII’s assessment, in line with that of his predecessors in the Church’s long confrontation with the errors of modernity, was abruptly abandoned after the Council in favor of the now prevailing “conciliar optimism” regarding what Gaudium et spes described as the “current trend of the world...”
An ill-defined ecumenism promotes what Pope Pius XI called “a most grave error, by which the foundations of the Catholic faith are completely destroyed”---meaning the idea that Christian unity no longer requires “the return to the one true Church of Christ of those who are separated from it”]­—as if membership in the Catholic Church no longer mattered for the salvation of souls. A perpetual process of “dialogue” replaces the Church’s forthright proclamation of the necessity of conversion to the one true religion for both human flourishing in this life and eternal happiness in the life to come. Along with these developments, an unprecedented liturgical reform devised by a committee has ended with what Cardinal Ratzinger  called “the collapse of the liturgy” and later, as Pope Benedict XVI, the “banalization of the liturgy.”- Dr.John Rao, The Lake Garda Statement.


 Pius XII urged a renewal of missionary activity in the face of the rising specter of a civilizational apostasy and its fatal consequences...
Lionel:
There should be a renewal of missionary activity but Pope Pius XII, the SSPX bishops and the Lake Garda statement signatories have made an error. Dr.John Rao and the other traitionalists today wronly assume hypothetical cases are not hypothetical.They have made this error in principle.

They suggest theoretical cases of the baptism of desire, allegedly without the baptism of water etc are not theoretical.Since they are exceptios to the Feneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS Feeneyite).

Since there is known salvation outside the Catholic Church why should there be  missionary activity for the Lake Garda seminar participants?
They have discarded EENS ( Feeneyite).
Instead they have replaced it with a new doctrine EENS ( Cushingite).
Since hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire are visible to be exceptions to EENS( Feneeyite) they now have an EENS ( Cushingite) i.e EENS with exceptions.
Unlike them I affirm EENS ( Feeneyite).
So I know all non  Catholics are oriented to Hell with no exceptions.So Catholic mission is important since there are no theological exceptions for me.
Image result for Photo of Dr.John Rao at Lake Garda

Every year I keep saying the same thing but they do not understand or they do not want to respond.
______________________________

An ill-defined ecumenism promotes what Pope Pius XI called “a most grave error, by which the foundations of the Catholic faith are completely destroyed”---meaning the idea that Christian unity no longer requires “the return to the one true Church of Christ of those who are separated from it”[9]­—as if membership in the Catholic Church no longer mattered for the salvation of souls.

Lionel: Yes.Since for Dr. John Rao theologically there are known exceptions to the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite).Every one does not need to be a card carrying member of the Church.Every one does not need to have his name on the Parish Baptismal Register to avoid Hell.
So there is a new ecumenism. Why should Christians have to be members of the Catholic Church when Dr. John Rao, Chris Ferrara and John Vennari assume there is known salvation outside the Church with the baptism of desire and blood  and being saved in invincible ignorance?
Yes, they need to affirm EENS( Feeneyite) and not EENS ( Cushingite).
Image result for Photo of Fr. John Zuhlsdorf
It reminds me of Fr.John Zuhlsdorf.He says he does not affirm the hard line position of Fr.Leonard Feeney.At the same time he says we must affirm the dogma EENS. He's probably referring to a new version of EENS, EENS Cushingite.He assumes EENS( Cushingite) is the dogma EENS according to the Church Councils, popes and saints!

So for the Lake Garda seminar participants there is a replacment-doctrine.As it is there for the SSPX and the other traditionalists. There is EENS( Cushingite),Vatican Council II( Cushingite), ecumenism( Cushingite) etc etc.They add a false premise and conclusion in the interpretation of  magisterial teachings.This is why there is no mission and no ecumenism of return.

I affirm the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite), Vatican Council II( Feneeyite), the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite) and Letter of the Holy Office 1949( Feeneyite)-all without the false premise and conclusion.

Along with these developments, an unprecedented liturgical reform devised by a committee has ended with what Cardinal Ratzinger  called “the collapse of the liturgy”[10] and later, as Pope Benedict XVI, the “banalization of the liturgy.”
Lionel: The New Theology which Pope Benedict supported is based on the lie, the irrationality, which created a new doctrine. It is the basis of Cushingism.It has created a new ecclesiology for the Traditional Latin Mass and the Novus Ordo Mass.
Pope Benedict a few months back in the interview with Avvenire said EENS is no more like it was at the time of the 16th century missionaries.Since he interprets EENS ( Feeneyite) with the New Theology.It is with irrational Cushingism, in which hypothetical statements are considered to be non hypothetical.
So there is no Vatican Council II(EENS) for Pope Benedict XVI.Instead there is a Vatican Council II Cushingite.Since there is ' development of doctrine' for him, when hypothetical references are assumed to be objectively known in the present times.

This passes of for Catholic philosophical reasoning.It is the philosophical basis of a  new Catholic theology.It is accepted by all the signatories of the Lake Garda Statement.There would have been no 'Conciliar changes' without this error.
-Lionel Andrades


http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2015/07/the-lake-garda-statement.html