Thursday, March 22, 2018

The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 is in heresy.It rejects the teachings of the popes on extra ecclesiam nulla salus and considers them to be in heresy. This Letter creates a schism with the past popes

The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 is in heresy schism  since it rejects the teachings of the popes and considers them to be in heresy on extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The Letter creates a schism with the past popes.
The Letter says ' that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member' while the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus,defined by three Church Councils says it is necessary.



So the Letter is in schism with the past popes including those who affirmed EENS in the ordinary Magisterium. We have to note that when they referred to the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I:I) it was to hypothetical cases which were not relevant or exceptions to their traditional and strict interpretation of EENS.
So today we have to choose between the past popes or the heretical and schismatic Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston 1949.
I am a Feeneyite. The Letter is Cushingite.



The past popes were Feeneyite.The present two popes are Cushingite.a
The two popes accept the second part of the Letter. I reject.I accept the first part of the Letter which is contradicted by the second part.
If it is said that I am in heresy then be consistent and say that all the past popes are in heresy. Also Vatican Council II would be in heresy for saying all need faith and baptism for salvation (Ad Gentes 7).
I affirm Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).I am not saying anything new.I am affirming what the popes have said down the centuries and which is in harmony with Vatican Council II.So I accept the first part of the Letter and reject the second part since it contradicts the first part, with the use of an irrationality, a false premise, nonsensical theology, which was politically expedient in 1949..




So those Catholics who follow the irrational reasoning of the Letter(1949) end up in heresy on EENS, Nicene Creed, Vatican Council II etc and in schism with the past popes over the centuries on extra ecclesiam nulla salus.




















It was based upon the irrational reasoning of the Letter(1949) that Cardinal Ladaria on March 1, 2018 at the Press Conference of Placuit Deo, in the question and answer session, said that Lumen Gentium 8 is a rupture with the past exclusivist understanding of salvation.-Lionel Andrades

Cardinal Braz de Avez and Fr.Manelli use the false premise ( Graphics)















-Lionel Andrades



MARCH 22, 2018


Franciscans of the Immaculate can go ahead and affirm Vatican Council II like me http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/franciscans-of-immaculate-can-go-ahead.html

Franciscans of the Immaculate can go ahead and affirm Vatican Council II like me

So both groups of the Franciscans of the Immaculate are making a doctrinal error on Vatican Council II. 1 It depends upon how they see the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I).Is it physically visible or invisible for them?
This is the decider.
Presently both groups of the F.I see BOD, BOB and I.I as being visible.This is irrational.Yet this is the philosophical position of Cardinal Braz de Avez and Fr. Stefano Mannelli,F.I.











I am sorry to have to point it out.I respect both of them.But someone has got to say this. And no one else is doing so.
This is a community I have been close to for some 16 years and I am not ready to fall back easily.
Both groups can interpret Vatican Council II without the Ladaria Error( LG 8 is a visible case and so an exception to traditional EENS),without the false premise(invisible people are visible on earth),without Cushingism(hypothetical cases are non hypothetical) and Vatican Council II will then have the hermeneutic of continuity with the past.
So they can affirm Vatican Council II, premise-free and Feeneyite, with the hermeneutic of continuity with the past.
They may or may not want to acknowledge that the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, an inter office letter between bishops, made an objective mistake.The Letter sees BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to known people saved outside the Church.The same mistake was made at Vatican Council II by some of the cardinals.
Now the Franciscans of the Immaculate have Vatican Council II before them and they know that Pope Francis permits the Traditional Latin Mass to be offered in the Church.So they can go ahead and affirm Vatican Council II like me.
The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate have already clarified for the local newspapers that they do not reject Vatican Council II but interpret the Council without the Rahnerian theology.They do not interpret the Council like the secular newspapers in Italy.
So they affirm Vatican Council II. This is positive.

Now go ahead and announce that you affirm Vatican Council II like the lay man Lionel Andrades.


BOB,BOB and I.I are not explicit for him.This is the difference between him and everyone else.
Since BOD,BOB and I.I are not objective cases in 2018 they are not relevant to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the old ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, for me.
So BOD, BOB and I.I are not rejected, instead are accepted as only hypothetical cases .They can only be hypothetical cases for us human beings.
This is rational, logical, traditional and non heretical.
It can be affirmed by members of the Catholic Charismatic  Renewal Movement, Focolares and the Neo Catehecumenal Way of Kiko Arguello.

All the religious communities(Dominicans, Carmelities, Redemptorists), the Vatican Curia and traditionalists can accept it.
-Lionel Andrades

1.

MARCH 21, 2018




Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate must announce immediately that they affirm Vatican Council II without the Ladaria Error and in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church and the Syllabus of Errors

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/franciscan-sisters-of-immaculate-must.html



Image result for Photo Catholic Canon LAw 

Why is Cardinal Braz de Avez imposing the Ladaria Error on the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the Mannelli Family ?


http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/why-is-cardinal-braz-de-avez-imposing.html