Tuesday, April 17, 2018

Repost :Bishop Athanasius Schneider could affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King and the old ecumenism without rejecting Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) : instead Bishop Fellay is asked to reconcile with Vatican Council (Cushingite) and EENS(Cushingite) which is heretical

 JANUARY 6, 2017

Bishop Athanasius Schneider could affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King and the old ecumenism without rejecting Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) : instead Bishop Fellay is asked to reconcile with Vatican Council (Cushingite) and EENS(Cushingite) which is heretical

 BISHOP ATHANASIUS SCHNEIDER COULD AFFIRM THE  SOCIAL REIGN OF CHRIST THE KING AND THE OLD ECUMENISM WITHOUT REJECTING VATICAN COUNCIL II ( FEENEYITE).

He presently affirms Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) as a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) and this is acceptable to Ecclesia Dei, the two popes and the Left.He keeps his job and does not upset the cart.
Instead if he would set an example for Bishop Fellay and affirm EENS( Feneeyite) along with Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) he may be persecuted by the Vatican Curia.
I have been saying this over the years and he has never commented.It is not part of his world view.
-Lionel Andrades


Traditionalist, sedevacantist websites need to be updated

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/01/traditionalist-sedevacantist-websites.html



JANUARY 5, 2017
With the new model for their websites the traditionalists and sedevacantists would be affirming the Social Reign of Christ the King and the old ecumenism based on the old ecclesiology without rejecting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1995)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/01/with-new-model-for-their-websites.html


http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2017/01/bishop-schneider-i-have-asked-msgr.html

Pakistan: Muslims open fire on Christians leaving Sunday worship, two dead, five injured


“At least 2 dead, 5 injured in attack on Christian community near church in Quetta,” by Syed Ali Shah, Dawn, April 15, 2018 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
At least two members of the Christian community were killed and five others injured in a firing incident near a church in Quetta, DawnNewsTV reported.
DIG Quetta Abdur Razzaq Cheema said the incident occurred when worshippers were leaving after attending the Sunday service at a church in Essa Nagri area of the provincial capital.
Unidentified attackers riding a motorbike opened fire on the members of the Christian community and managed to flee the scene soon after the incident, the DIG said.
The injured were rushed to Bolan Medical Complex, Quetta, where two injured worshippers succumbed to their, the hospital officials said.
Earlier this month, four members of a Christian family travelling in a rickshaw were killed in a firing incident on Quetta’s Shah Zaman road. The Christian family belonged to Punjab and had come to Quetta to see relatives….

Cyprus: 20 Muslim migrants go to church, start screaming, cursing, and beating the attendees


“Night of terror for Christians in Cyprus after attack of Muslim migrants,” Voice of Europe, April 7, 2018 (thanks to David):
Wednesday night, about 20 Muslim migrants attacked a Christian congregation outside St. Mary’s church during the holy liturgy in Leukosia, Greece’s Pronews reports.
Most of the Christians were inside the church when 20 Muslims suddenly arrived at the temple’s yard and began screaming, cursing, and beating the attendees.
According to statements given by locals at Sigma live news, one of the Muslims was waving an adze and tried to use it against members of the congregation. The Muslims disappeared after the police, called in by the terrorized believers, appeared on the scene….

 https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/04/cyprus-20-muslim-migrants-go-to-church-start-screaming-cursing-and-beating-the-attendees

Vatican shuts down Jewish priest's Order in Belgium

Monday, 16 April 2018

Vatican shuts down Jewish priest's Order in Belgium



Fr. Michel Marie Zanotti Sorkine a French priest, who is also Jewish, is an extraordinary man. Inspired by Christ, this modern-day St. Paul served the faithful and all who would approach him in Marseilles.  I first came across Fr. Sorkine a number of years ago, reading about his incredible pastoral activities in a local Catholic journal, The Michael. What struck me was how Fr. Sorkine walked the streets of Marseilles in his cassock, the door of his rectory open every night until eleven. "Office hours", so prevalent amongst lukewarm priests after the Second Vatican Council, was not for Fr. Sorkine. Like his Jewish forebear, St. Paul, he portrayed that tenacity that had a messianic streak of the once chosen people.

Fr. Sorkine even established the Priestly Society of the Holy Apostles. His Society soon made its way to Belgium, at the invitation of Archbishop Leonard. Sadly, the ultra-modernist Cardinal Danneels (also publicly known for his fraternization with Freemasons) set his sights on destroying the Jewish priest's little Society. The new Archbishop, neo-modernist, De Kesel expelled the Society, whilst setting up an Islamic prayer centre at Catholic (??) schools. The Society, has finally been demolished by ultra neo-modernists in Rome: the executioners, Cardinal Beniamino Stella and Msgr. Domenico Mamberti. In late 2017, Stella obtained a decree of dissolution from the Pope. 

Read the full story here.   

Whatever you do, dear friends, stay with the Church during this very dark hour of error, confusion, evil and betrayal. Stay with the Church as She is scourged and crucified by the leaders of the Church, just as Christ was scourged and crucified by the leaders of the one, true religion of His time. Do not wander off to some schismatic Synagogue of Satan. There is one Church and She is the one, and only Mystical Body of Christ. Stay by the side of your Mother, the Church. Love her, stay with her, be Loyal to her and run the good race to your eternal salvation. 
https://torontocatholicwitness.blogspot.it/2018/04/vatican-shuts-down-jewish-priests-order.html

Jim Caviezel: "senza Medjugorje non avrei potuto interpretare il ruolo di Gesù nel film The Passion…


Jim Caviezel: "senza Medjugorje non avrei potuto interpretare il ruolo di Gesù nel film The Passion…

Jim Caviezel, attore statunitense, figlio di un medico oriundo svizzero-slovacco e di una irlandese, è diventato famoso in tutto il mondo per aver interpretato il ruolo di Gesù nel film “Passion …
https://gloria.tv/article/nQQuMWkkFk8z6J9ahEAoridDG

We can affirm hypothetical and speculative Lumen Gentium 8, 14, and 16 along with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and this is not known to Paolo Pascualucci, the SSPX priests in Italy, Steve Skojec and Maike Hickson so Vatican Council II is presented as a rupture with Tradition



We can affirm hypothetical and speculative baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance along with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). This was not known to Paulo Pascualucci in his report on the blog 1Peter5.
We can affirm hypothetical and speculative  Lumen Gentium 8, 14, and 16  along with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Since this was not known to Paolo Pascualucci, the late Romano Amerio and  Monsgr. Brunero Gherardini.It is not known to the SSPX priests in Italy and neither to  Steve Skojec and Maike Hickson.So  Vatican Council II is presented as a rupture with Tradition on the blog 1Peter5. 1
They all had mistaken hypothetical and speculative cases,as being known and visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church.So emerged exceptions to the dogma EENS and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church. 
The  fault does not lie with Vatican Council II but their false premise.It created a non traditional conclusion, a rupture with Tradition.
For me Vatican Council II does not contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.It is in harmony with  EENS.So there can only be an ecumenism of return and no rupture with the Syllabus of Errors.
-Lionel Andrades

APRIL 15, 2018


Six of Pasqualucci's 'distinct points of rupture with the Tradition of the Church in the texts of the Vatican II documents' are not a rupture

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/six-of-pasqualuccis-distinct-points-of.html



APRIL 15, 2018


Image result for Paolo Pasqualucci PhotosImage result for Romano Amerio PhotosImage result for Msgr. Brunero Gherardini  Photos

The interpretation of Paolo Pasqualucci, Romano Amerio and Msgr. Brunero Gherardini is irrational it can be seen in the text of the blog 1Peter5 : They misinterpreted hypothetical cases in Lumen Gentium, Unitatitis Redintegratio and Nostra Aetate as being objective people saved outside the Church.This was a mistake
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/the-interpretation-of-paolo-pasqualucci.html



APRIL 14, 2018



This imporant point was overlooked by Paolo Pasqualucci, Romano Amerio and Msgr. Brunero Gherardinihttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/this-imporant-point-was-overlooked.html


APRIL 14, 2018


Once this is understood we can always interpret Vatican Council II as affirming an ecumenism of return only

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/once-this-is-understood-we-can-always.html



JUNE 18, 2014



Cristina Siccardi ,Paolo Pasqualucci use the irrational inference in the interpretation of Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/cristina-siccardi-paolo-pasqualucci-use.html

Michael Voris can continue to affirm the dogma EENS and all magisterial documents/teachings with a rational philosophy and theology : he will not be rejecting BOD, BOB and I.I



Michael Voris correctly says that we must ask non Catholics to convert since, he implies, for me, that all non Catholics are going to Hell, unless they convert into the Catholic Church.Though he contradicts Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j, who at the Placuit Deo Press Conference said that the Catholic Church no more teaches that it has the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation.Michael Voris instead says that there is exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. It's the opposite.




DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VORIS AND LADARIA
Why is there this difference between Michael Voris and Cardinal Ladaria.
The cause is a small premise.This premise creates the  difference between them.
Both of them use this irrational premise to interpret Vatican Council II.
For both of them invisible baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are visible exceptions to the dogma EENS.
The conclusion is a rupture with Tradition.This is affirmed by Cardinal Luiz Ladaria and it is rejected by Michael Voris.Michael side steps Vatican Council II ( with the premise) and goes back to Tradition( the popes and saints) for support.
So when the CMTV staff affirms the dogma EENS and  the objections come in, since for Catholics in general, invisible BOD, BOB and I.I are 'visible' exceptions what should CMTV do, how should they respond?
For the CMTV Staff to continue to support the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation, they have to understand and make known, two important points.







TWO IMPORTANT POINTS
1.Announce or make it known that they accept BOD, BOB and I.I.They accept them as hypothetical and speculative cases, known only to God.So they can only be theoretical and conceptual for us human beings. There is no other choice.
This is common sense. This is not a theology or a personal view.This is something factual and objective.
2.They have to note that the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 is traditional in the first part  while the second part is irrational and heretical.It contradicts the first part.So with an irrational philosophy ( visible for us BOD, BOB and I.I) it contradicts the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II(AG 7).The new philosophy creates a new theology( outside the Church there is known salvation). The conclusion is that there is a rupture with Tradition.

VATICAN COUNCIL II AND EENS IN HARMONY 
So when CMTV is criticized for affirming the dogma EENS, they should announce, that they affirm all Magisterial documents/teachings but they interpret them with a rational philosophy and theology.They must announce that they affirm Vatican Council II and EENS and all the Catechisms.However they do it based on the reasoning in the first part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and not the second part.
So when Cardinal Luiz Ladaria and I affirm all Magisterial documents/teachings, the difference presently between us, is that he uses the false premise and I do not.The CMTV staff can follow me.





BOD, BOB AND I.I ARE COMPATIBLE WITH FEENEYITE EENS
So no one can then say that Michael Voris is in heresy for rejecting BOD,BOB and I.I  when he affirms the dogma EENS.Since he can affirm hypothetical and speculative BOD,BOB and I.I along with the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS. 


They are compatible.We do not have to choose between one or the other.





This is the mistake Cardinal Ladaria made  at the March 1,2018, Press Conference.He assumed Lumen Gentium 8 was a visible and known exception to EENS.
Lumen Gentium 8 is hypothetical always for us.So it could not have been an exception to EENS.Cardinal Ladaria was affirming the second part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and rejecting the first part of the Letter and traditional EENS.
Michael Voris could ask Cardinal Ladaria the same question he asked Fr. Jonathan Morris : whom does Cardinal Ladaria know who will be saved without being a member of the Catholic Church, whom does he know who will be saved with 'elements of sanctification and truth' in other religions(LG 8)? Whom does he know who will be saved outside the Church where the true Church of Christ allegedly and supposedly  subsists(LG 8) ?
No one.

VATICAN COUNCIL II IN HARMONY WITH PAST EXCLUSIVIST ECCLESIOLOGY
Having cleared this basic issue I come to the next step which is also important for CMTV.
1. CMTV can state that Vatican Council II does not contradict the Church's traditional teaching on it having the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation.I am not referring to an ambiguous Vatican Council II , one with dual meanings.
2.Since there is no known salvation outside the Church we still have the old ecclesiology of the Church. It supports only an ecumenism of return.
3.Since there is no known salvation outside the Church we have the traditional doctrines on mission.We know that all non Catholics who have died are in Hell and those living in the present times, who do not convert into the Church, are also going there.
4.So the New Evangelisation is theologically flawed and has no support in Vatican Council II.How can we evangelize alongside Protestants when they are all oriented to Hell according to the Magisterium of the Church.Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith for salvation.Protestants do not have Catholic Faith, which include the Sacraments and the faith and moral teachings of the Church.
So without rejecting Vatican Council II, the Catechisms and Vatican Council II, Michael Voris will support the old philosophy ( invisible people are invisible) and reject the new philosophy( invisible non Catholics saved are visible).
He will have accepted the old theology( outside the Church there is no salvation) and will have rejected, at the same time, the New Theology( outside the church there is no salvation).
He will affirm Tradition and reject the heretical New Evangelisation.He will affirm an ecumenism of return based on the old exclusivist ecclesiology, knowing that the New Ecumenism has no citations in Vatican Council II to support it, unless of course,the false premise is used.


CMTV AFFIRMS ALL MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS RATIONALLY
So no one can call the CMTV Staff heretics. Since they are affirming Magisterial documents/ teachings and they are not using the irrational premise ( invisible people are visible) to create a rupture with Tradition( outside the Church there is known salvation).
So Vatican Council II is no more dogmatic,  when, with a false premise it rejectsthe dogma EENS and traditional doctrines based on the dogma EENS.
CMTV would be affirming Vatican Council II along with EENS. Vatican Council II along with the Syllabus of Errors( ecumenism of return). Vatican Council II along with traditional mission doctrines as it was known in the 16th century.Vatican Council II along with the past exclusivist ecclesiology associated with the Traditional Latin Mass.





















The CMTV Staff would know that Cardinal Ladaria has used a  false premise, which they avoid, and so he is in heresy.According to Canon Law a Prefect of the CDF must be able to affirm de fide teachings of the Catholic Church.-Lionel Andrades 


APRIL 16, 2018

Michael Voris maintains the ambiguity and does not address the points I repeat
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/michael-voris-is-maintaining-ambiguity.html

The Vortex—Just Gotta’ Say It …

https://youtu.be/xBzStS4u9mY



What Did He Just Say?

https://youtu.be/BTMasSYZWRc



APRIL 14, 2018



Michael Voris can still choose the alternative interpretation of Vatican Council II and try to bring the truth out in a way which will not offend the Archdiocese

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/michael-voris-can-still-choose.html







MARCH 4, 2018


Archbishop Luis Ladaria, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, speaking at today's press conference at the Vatican, March 1, 2018.  Image result for National catholic register logo
The headline of Edward Pentin's report on the National Catholic Register is false.The Vatican has not affirmed the traditional teaching on salvation. Instead it has denied it.  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/the-headline-of-edward-pentins-report.html