The priests and laity at the Society of
St. Pius X (SSPX) chapel in Rome are not affirming the Catholic Faith in public
in order to maintain their status, reputation, and worldly interests.
They are not affirming the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the Council of Florence (1442) which did not
mention any exceptions.
Neither are they affirming Vatican
Council II with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc, as referring to
hypothetical and visible cases, which are not objective exceptions for the
dogma EENS.
The situation is the same at the Novus
Ordo Mass in the rest of the churches and chapels in Rome. This is a denial of
the Catholic Faith by even the Auxiliary bishops at the Rome Vicariate.
So the Nicene Creed has been changed and
all the Catechisms contradicting each other.
The Oath of Office of the bishop is
modernist at the Latin Mass and the Mass in the vernacular. Since the bishop
interprets Magisterial Documents with the false premise i.e. invisible people
are visible in the present times.
There are two Profession of faith,
depending upon which of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II are
chosen.
The SSPX is still selling books with
Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. This is unethical. It is the same
at the Vatican offices for ecumenism etc.
The SSPX which expelled Fr. Florien
Abrahamowich for political reasons, is
now also not affirming the Catholic faith on Vatican Council II , the Creeds
etc, for political reasons.
The SSPX priest and faithful at their
chapel in Rome interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. Why should I do the
same?
The Council can be interpreted
rationally and honestly.- Lionel Andrades