FEBRUARY 1, 2014
MULLER, LADARIA, DI NOI, POZZO, KASPAR AND KOCH WANT THE SSPX TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH THE 'RIGHT HAND SIDE' COLUMN FOR CANONICAL STATUS
Cardinal Ratzinger and Archbishop Lefebvre did not know that Vatican Council II affirms extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with the left hand side column ?
For Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Michael Voris and Robert Sungenis Vatican Council II is 'ambigous' since they are using the right hand side column; explicit for us, known in reality,visible in the flesh,defacto,objective.
With the left hand side column Vatican Council II is in harmony with St. Robert Bellarmine, St. Francis Xavier and St. Francis of Assisi on extra ecclesiam nulla salus.It is also in agreement with the Nicene and Athanasius Creed.
With the right hand side column Vatican Council II contradicts itself. Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation.Lumen Gentium 16 says those in invincible ignorance can be saved implying there are known exceptions to Ad Gentes 7. The same confusion would be there in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Dominus Iesus, Redemptoris Missio etc.
The hermeneutic of continuity or rupture depends on the hermeneutic with the left hand or right hand side column.
During the Vatican-SSPX talks, initiated by Pope Benedict XVI, both sides were using the right hand side column.
Ecclesia Dei's Archbishop Di Noi and Monisgnor Guido Pozzo are liberals since they use the right hand side column. They may be traditional on other aspects of the Catholic Faith.
For full canonical status the Vatican expects the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) to interpret Vatican Council II with the right hand side column.The SSPX seems unaware of there being two options in the interpretation of the Council, one rational and traditional and the other irrational and a break with extra eclesiam nulla salus and Tradition.
They all interpret Pope Pius XII and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 using the right hand side column.
They criticize Fr. Leonard Feeney since they assume there are known, explicit, visible, de facto, exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus. If they used the left hand side column they would support Fr.Leonard Feeney. Vatican Council II would be traditional on other religions and Christian communities and churches.Religious communities would not reject the teachings of their founders on the subject of salvation.
What makes you a liberal or a traditionalist is not if you accept or reject Vatican Council II but if you are using the left hand side or the right hand side column in the interpretation of the Council or the Catechism.
Fr.John Zuhlsdorf has written that the Vatican could grant the SSPX canonical status 'with the stroke of a pen'. It seems that the Vatican has simply to announce that all salvation referred to in the Council, has to be interpreted with the left hand side column. So Vatican Council II would not contradict the traditional teaching on inter religious dialogue and ecumenism.Vatican Council II would support the SSPX's traditional position.
With the Council affirming the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salusCatholics have a duty to proclaim the dogma in a secular state.Dignitatis Humane,Vatican Council II refers to the freedom of religious worship, in a state with a secular Constitution and the right for Catholics to proclaim their faith.
All salvation referred to in Vatican Council II i.e saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16), imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3),seeds of the Word (AG 11), good and holy things in other religions (NA 2) etc are either:
implicit or explicit for us.
hypothetical or known in reality.
invisible or visible in the flesh.
dejure ( in principle or defacto ( in fact ).
subjective or objective.
So one can choose from the left hand side or the right hand sidecolumn.
If the right hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council IIcontradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and Tradition in general on other religions and Christian communities and churches. There are known exceptions in 2014 to the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Cathlic Church. The dead- saved are visible.
If the left hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus, nor Tradition on other religions and Christian communities and churches.
Most people interpret Vatican Council II with the right hand side values.
So the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance was never ever an exception to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney, unless one is using the right hand side column.There were and are no known exceptions.
- ...and also Cardinal Walter Kasparhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/01/padre-pio-prayer-groups-neo_31.html#links -Lionel Andrades __________________________
JULY 9, 2014
Ecclesiastical blackmail?
Fr Frederico Lombardi says the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate must be obedient to the pope. The pope ' remains the essential point of reference for every religious institute that does not wish to become an association of people who embark on an autonomous path, of their own volition, and eventually disperse.'(1)
He means that the FFI must accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the right hand side, red column.They must accept the irrational column to remain in the Catholic Church. If they accept Vatican Council II with the blue column, the left hand side column, would it be accepted by him?
All salvation referred to in Vatican Council II i.e saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16), imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3),seeds of the Word (AG 11), good and holy things in other religions (NA 2) etc are either:
LEFT HAND SIDE COLUMN or RIGHT HAND COLUMN
So the Franciscans of the Immaculate can choose from the left hand side or the right hand side column.
If the right hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II contradicts itself. LG 16 ( invincible ignorance is an exception to 'all' needing 'faith and baptism') is contradicted by Ad Gentes 7. AG 7 like the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus says all need to convert into the Catholic Church.
If the left hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II does not contradict itself. LG 16 does not contradict AG 7 and LG 14.
The Vatican interprets Vatican Council II with the right hand side values.
LEFT HAND SIDE COLUMN or RIGHT HAND COLUMN
implicit or explicit for us.
hypothetical or known in reality.
invisible or visible in the flesh.
dejure ( in principle) or defacto ( in fact ).
subjective or objective.
hypothetical or known in reality.
invisible or visible in the flesh.
dejure ( in principle) or defacto ( in fact ).
subjective or objective.
So the Franciscans of the Immaculate can choose from the left hand side or the right hand side column.
If the right hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II contradicts itself. LG 16 ( invincible ignorance is an exception to 'all' needing 'faith and baptism') is contradicted by Ad Gentes 7. AG 7 like the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus says all need to convert into the Catholic Church.
If the left hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II does not contradict itself. LG 16 does not contradict AG 7 and LG 14.
The Vatican interprets Vatican Council II with the right hand side values.
Pope Francis does not interpret Vatican Council II with the blue, left hand side column. This has to be accepted by the Franciscans of the Immaculate Friars and Sisters and all Catholics ?
To force the Franciscans of the Immaculate to accept an irrationality which was not part of the Deposit of the Faith before 1949 and then to threathen them with eventual dispersion is blackmail.Ecclesiastical blackmail.
The Franciscans of the Immaculate are obligated to accept Vatican Council II but not with the red column, the right hand side interpretation.They have an obligation to reject this irrational version .-Lionel Andrades
1.
Fr.Frederico Lombardi does not address doctrinal questions on Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate
July 8, 2014
There are Catholic religious and lay persons who use the the left hand side column in the interpretation of magisterial text
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/there-are-catholic-religious-and-lay.html#links
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/there-are-catholic-religious-and-lay.html#links
THURSDAY, JULY 10, 2014
Rational Interpretation of Vatican Council II : hope for the Franciscans of the Immaculate
Here are four approaches to the interpretation of Vatican Council II and other magisterial texts.
1.Two Questions.
2.Left Hand Side or Right Hand Side Column ( or the blue column and the red column)
3.Feeneyism or Cushingism.
4.With the use of a false premise or without it.
This is important for the Franciscans of
the Immaculate. Since there can be only one rational interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.This interpretation also agrees with Tradition.
So they are in a position to affirm Tradition and also Vatican Council II. They can have their cake and eat it too.
So they are in a position to affirm Tradition and also Vatican Council II. They can have their cake and eat it too.
It is Pope Francis and the Vatican Curia who cannot cite Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition, unless, they are using an irrational interpretation which results in a non traditional conclusion.It's a mistake.
So the FFI and the SSPX are in a position to tell the Vatican that they accept Vatican Council II, knowing :-
1.The dead are not visible to us in 2014 (Two Questions).
2.They use the left hand column in the interpretation.
3. They use Feeneyism in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and other magisterial documents.
4.They avoid the False Premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council.
1.
How would you respond to these TWO QUESTIONS ?
1) Do we personally know the dead now saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16) etc,can we see them, are they physically visible to us in 2014 ?
How would you respond to these TWO QUESTIONS ?
1) Do we personally know the dead now saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16) etc,can we see them, are they physically visible to us in 2014 ?
2) Since we do not know any of these cases, in real life, they are not visible for us, there are no known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, or Ad Gentes 7 which states 'all' need 'faith and baptism' for salvation ?
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
2.
Would you interpret Vatican Council II with the right hand side or left hand side column?
LEFT HAND SIDE COLUMN - RIGHT HAND SIDE COLUMNAll salvation referred to in Vatican Council II i.e saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16), imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3),seeds of the Word (AG 11), good and holy things in other religions (NA 2) etc are either:
implicit or explicit for us.
hypothetical or known in reality.
invisible or visible in the flesh.
dejure ( in principle) or defacto ( in fact ).
subjective or objective
So one can choose from the left hand side or the right hand side column.
If the right hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and Tradition in general on other religions and Christian communities and churches. There are known exceptions in 2014 to the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Cathlic Church. The dead- saved are visible.
If the left hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus, nor Tradition on other religions and Christian communities and churches.
Most people interpret Vatican Council II with the right hand side values.
So the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance was never ever an exception to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney, unless one is using the right hand side column.There were and are no known exceptions
._____________________________________
._____________________________________
3.
Would you interpret Vatican Council II according to Feenyism or Cushingism. Cushingism is irrational.
1.
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it."Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him (Heb. 11:6), yet a necessity lies upon the Church (1 Cor. 9:16), and at the same time a sacred duty, to preach the Gospel...-Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II.
FEENEYISM (rational): The orange text does not contradict the text in yellow since the cases referred to are defacto.They are not known to us, personally.We do not know and cannot know these cases. So they are not exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
CUSHINGISM( irrational): The orange text contradicts the text in yellow .It is assumed that thse cases are known to us in the present times. We can physically see the dead who are known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney.
2.
CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
"Outside the Church there is no salvation"
846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers?335 Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:
Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.-Catechism of the Catholic Church 846
FEENEYISM (rational): The orange text does not contradict the text in yellow since the cases referred to are defacto.They are not known in reality. They not known to us, personally .We do not know and cannot know these cases. So they are not exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
CUSHINGISM( irrational): The orange text contradicts the text in yellow .It is assumed that thse cases are known to us in the present times. It is presumed that we can see the dead who are known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney.This is irrational.
-Lionel Andrades
-Lionel Andrades
_____________________________________
4.
You can interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise ( we can physically see the dead).Or it can be interpreted without the false premise. The false premise makes the conclusion irrational.
False Premise : We can physically see , know a Protestant in 2014 saved as such.
Conclusion:
Cases of imperfect communion with the Church are visible to us so they are known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Without the False Premise: UR 3 refers to a possibility known only to God.It is not visible us.
Since it is unknown to us it cannot be an exception to the dogma on exclusive salvation.
Since it is unknown to us it cannot be an exception to the dogma on exclusive salvation.
False Premise: We can physically see, know a Jew or Hindu who is 'good and holy' and is saved in 2014.
Conclusion:
Cases of good and holy non Catholics who are saved or going to be saved, are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Without the False Premise: NA 2 is a possibility , a hypothetical case. It is irrelevant to the dogma on salvation.It is not visble to us.
False Premise: Those saved with the ' seeds of the Word' (AG 11 etc) are personally known to us. We can meet them.
Conclusion: Since these cases are personally known to us , they are visible exceptions to the dogma outside the church there is no salvation.
Without the False Premise: There are no known exceptions to the traditional teaching on other religions.NA 2 is not one of them.There are no cases physically visible to us in 2014.
___________________________________________
-Lionel Andrades
TUESDAY, APRIL 13, 2021
Repost : Rational Interpretation of Vatican Council II : hope for the Franciscans of the Immaculate
APRIL 13, 2021
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican is not magisterial on Vatican Council II since he interprets the Council with the false premise, inference and conclusion instead of the rational and traditional option, in harmony with the past Magisterium of the Catholic Church.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-prefect-of_13.html
JULY 10, 2014
Rational Interpretation of Vatican Council II : hope for the Franciscans of the Immaculate
Here are four approaches to the interpretation of Vatican Council II and other magisterial texts.
1.Two Questions.
2.Left Hand Side or Right Hand Side Column ( or the blue column and the red column)
3.Feeneyism or Cushingism.
4.With the use of a false premise or without it.
This is important for the Franciscans of
the Immaculate. Since there can be only one rational interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.This interpretation also agrees with Tradition.
So they are in a position to affirm Tradition and also Vatican Council II. They can have their cake and eat it too.
So they are in a position to affirm Tradition and also Vatican Council II. They can have their cake and eat it too.It is Pope Francis and the Vatican Curia who cannot cite Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition, unless, they are using an irrational interpretation which results in a non traditional conclusion.It's a mistake.
So the FFI and the SSPX are in a position to tell the Vatican that they accept Vatican Council II, knowing :-
1.The dead are not visible to us in 2014 (Two Questions).
2.They use the left hand column in the interpretation.
3. They use Feeneyism in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and other magisterial documents.
4.They avoid the False Premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council.
1.
How would you respond to these TWO QUESTIONS ?
1) Do we personally know the dead now saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16) etc,can we see them, are they physically visible to us in 2014 ?
How would you respond to these TWO QUESTIONS ?
1) Do we personally know the dead now saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16) etc,can we see them, are they physically visible to us in 2014 ?
2) Since we do not know any of these cases, in real life, they are not visible for us, there are no known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, or Ad Gentes 7 which states 'all' need 'faith and baptism' for salvation ?
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
2.
Would you interpret Vatican Council II with the right hand side or left hand side column?
LEFT HAND SIDE COLUMN - RIGHT HAND SIDE COLUMNAll salvation referred to in Vatican Council II i.e saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16), imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3),seeds of the Word (AG 11), good and holy things in other religions (NA 2) etc are either:
implicit or explicit for us.
hypothetical or known in reality.
invisible or visible in the flesh.
dejure ( in principle) or defacto ( in fact ).
subjective or objective
So one can choose from the left hand side or the right hand side column.
If the right hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and Tradition in general on other religions and Christian communities and churches. There are known exceptions in 2014 to the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Cathlic Church. The dead- saved are visible.
If the left hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus, nor Tradition on other religions and Christian communities and churches.
Most people interpret Vatican Council II with the right hand side values.
So the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance was never ever an exception to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney, unless one is using the right hand side column.There were and are no known exceptions
._____________________________________
._____________________________________
3.
Would you interpret Vatican Council II according to Feenyism or Cushingism. Cushingism is irrational.
1.
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it."Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him (Heb. 11:6), yet a necessity lies upon the Church (1 Cor. 9:16), and at the same time a sacred duty, to preach the Gospel...-Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II.
FEENEYISM (rational): The orange text does not contradict the text in yellow since the cases referred to are defacto.They are not known to us, personally.We do not know and cannot know these cases. So they are not exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
CUSHINGISM( irrational): The orange text contradicts the text in yellow .It is assumed that thse cases are known to us in the present times. We can physically see the dead who are known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney.
2.
CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
"Outside the Church there is no salvation"
846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers?335 Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:
Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.-Catechism of the Catholic Church 846
FEENEYISM (rational): The orange text does not contradict the text in yellow since the cases referred to are defacto.They are not known in reality. They not known to us, personally .We do not know and cannot know these cases. So they are not exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
CUSHINGISM( irrational): The orange text contradicts the text in yellow .It is assumed that thse cases are known to us in the present times. It is presumed that we can see the dead who are known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney.This is irrational.
-Lionel Andrades
-Lionel Andrades
_____________________________________
4.
You can interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise ( we can physically see the dead).Or it can be interpreted without the false premise. The false premise makes the conclusion irrational.
False Premise : We can physically see , know a Protestant in 2014 saved as such.
Conclusion:
Cases of imperfect communion with the Church are visible to us so they are known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Without the False Premise: UR 3 refers to a possibility known only to God.It is not visible us.
Since it is unknown to us it cannot be an exception to the dogma on exclusive salvation.
Since it is unknown to us it cannot be an exception to the dogma on exclusive salvation.
False Premise: We can physically see, know a Jew or Hindu who is 'good and holy' and is saved in 2014.
Conclusion:
Cases of good and holy non Catholics who are saved or going to be saved, are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Without the False Premise: NA 2 is a possibility , a hypothetical case. It is irrelevant to the dogma on salvation.It is not visble to us.
False Premise: Those saved with the ' seeds of the Word' (AG 11 etc) are personally known to us. We can meet them.
Conclusion: Since these cases are personally known to us , they are visible exceptions to the dogma outside the church there is no salvation.
Without the False Premise: There are no known exceptions to the traditional teaching on other religions.NA 2 is not one of them.There are no cases physically visible to us in 2014.
___________________________________________
-Lionel Andrades
JULY 19, 2021
Repost : Pope Francis changes doctrine when he chooses the irrational column to interpret Vatican Council II : Protestants redeemed ( Graphics)
___________________________________________________________________
JANUARY 27, 2018
Pope Francis changes doctrine when he chooses the irrational column to interpret Vatican Council II : Protestants redeemed ( with graphics)
-Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 27, 2018
Francis, Protestants Belong To The Redeemed
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/francis-protestants-belong-to-redeemed.html
JANUARY 27, 2018
THE TWO COLUMNS
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/the-two-columns.html
JANUARY 27, 2018
Pope Benedict is misleading the lay movements and religious communities since he will not recant and correct his error. Even bishops and cardinals have to accept the doctrinal deception.: two columns
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/pope-benedict-is-misleading-lay.html
JANUARY 26, 2018
Pope Benedict needs to recant and end the doctrinal deception in the Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/pope-benedict-needs-to-recant-and-end.html
JANUARY 26, 2018
This is how the magisterium presently wrongly interprets magisterial documents
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/this-is-how-magisterium-presently.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/01/pope-francis-changes-doctrine-when-he.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/01/pope-francis-changes-doctrine-when-he.html
______________________________________________
SATURDAY, JUNE 25, 2022
John Henry Weston does not tell Cardinal Gerhard Muller that Vatican Council II interpreted with a Rational Premise is in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire, USA and also the theology of the Roman Missal (1580).
John Henry Weston does not tell Cardinal Gerhard Muller that Vatican Council II interpreted with a Rational Premise is in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire, USA and also the theology of the Roman Missal (1580).
The popes did not announce that Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise supports the Feeneyite EENS of the St.Benedict Center, USA.
Cardinal Muller refers to ‘the doctrine of our Catholic faith’, in a different context, when interviewed by John Henry Weston the Editor-in- Chief of Life Site News.He does not mention, on the issue of doctrine, that Vatican Council II is in harmony with Feeneyite EENS when the Council is interpreted with the Rational Premise.There is no confusing what is implicit as being explicit and invisible as being visible.
This is known at the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire, USA.They interpret Vatican Council II and the dogma EENS ( baptism of desire etc) with only the Rational Premise.
Cardinal Muller and John Henry Weston do not do this. They use the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition.
This is a breakthrough on Vatican Council II and it was not known to Cardinal Muller when he was the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. -Lionel Andrades
JULY 19, 2021
Repost : Pope Francis changes doctrine when he chooses the irrational column to interpret Vatican Council II : Protestants redeemed ( Graphics)
___________________________________________________________________
JANUARY 27, 2018
Pope Francis changes doctrine when he chooses the irrational column to interpret Vatican Council II : Protestants redeemed ( with graphics)
-Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 27, 2018
Francis, Protestants Belong To The Redeemed
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/francis-protestants-belong-to-redeemed.html
JANUARY 27, 2018
THE TWO COLUMNS
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/the-two-columns.html
JANUARY 27, 2018
Pope Benedict is misleading the lay movements and religious communities since he will not recant and correct his error. Even bishops and cardinals have to accept the doctrinal deception.: two columns
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/pope-benedict-is-misleading-lay.html
JANUARY 26, 2018
Pope Benedict needs to recant and end the doctrinal deception in the Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/pope-benedict-needs-to-recant-and-end.html
JANUARY 26, 2018
This is how the magisterium presently wrongly interprets magisterial documents
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/this-is-how-magisterium-presently.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/01/pope-francis-changes-doctrine-when-he.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/01/pope-francis-changes-doctrine-when-he.html
______________________________________________
Posts
