The Giorgio Pira Islamic library in Palermo, Italy is ‘hate’ against the Catholic Church: the FSCIRE does not accept Vatican Council II interpreted rationally

 

The Giorgio Pira Islamic library in Palermo, Italy is ‘hate’ against the Catholic Church. Vatican Council II says all need faith and baptism for salvation (Ad Gentes 7).Catholics are tacitly invited at Palermo to convert to Islam and lose their soul to Hell.

There are good things in other religions but the religions are not paths to salvation (CDF, Notification, Fr. Jacques Dupuis sj, 2001, Dominus Iesus etc).

The religion of Mohammad is not a path to salvation according to Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845, 846, 1257 etc).

Catholics who are living with Muslims in a civil marriage are living in adultery, which is a mortal sin which leads to Hell. They are outside the Church and should not come forward for the Eucharist during Holy Mass. Those Catholics who convert into other religions are lost to Hell forever (Lumen Gentium 14, Ad Gentes 7).

 

ARCHBISHOP CORRADO LOREFICE

At Palermo, it is obligatory for Corado Lorefice, the Archbishop of Palermo, to accept Vatican Council II and interpret it only rationally and so traditionally. The Council then supports Feeneyite EENS and the Council of Florence (1442).This is obligatory for all cardinals and bishops. 

SYNODS CANNOT ACCEPT POLYGAMY OF ISLAM

 The Synods which accept the polygamy of Islam are political and are not based upon Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, which does not permit any innovation in faith and morals.

How can they knowingly hold Synods based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally? How can they appoint new cardinals who only interpret the Council, irrationally?

At the Biblicum, the pontifical university in Rome, students have to study the Quran, the same could be expected of all of us, at  future Synods, in the name of Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.

 Alberto Melloni of the FSCIRE (Bologna School) and the Giorgio Pira Islamic library in Palermo does not accept Vatican Council II interpreted rationally and traditionally.

The Islamic library of the FSCIRE in Palermo will be disseminating material which says Jews and Christians must be forced to convert. Even violence and death are recommended by the Islamic Tradition.

The Bible says that anyone who does not accept Jesus as the Son of God is the Anti Christ.For the Islamists in Palermo Jesus is not the Son of God.

The Catholic Church, the post Vatican Council II Church, supports the past exclusivist ecclesiology, when the Council is interpreted rationally and so ethically. This is Magisterial. Vatican Council II is a Magisterial Document only when it is interpreted rationally, I was telling my Parish Priest today morning. 

PAUL VI TO FRANCIS CHOSE THE IRRATIONAL MODEL

The interpretation of Vatican Council II by the popes from Paul VI to Francis was political and irrational.

Also being saved with the baptism of desire (BOD) and in invincible ignorance(I.I), since the time of Pope Pius XII and the creation of the state of Israel, was also irrational and political ( See Letter of the Holy Office 1949).The BOD and I.I refer to hypothetical and not objective cases in the present times.This was understood over the centuries before 1949.

 RE-INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY

We can now re-interpret Lumen Gentium 14 (baptism of desire) and Lumen Gentium 16 (being saved in invincible ignorance) rationally i.e. they are hypothetical and physically invisible cases only, always.

There is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the dogma EENS of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215).

So the Church returns to ‘an ecumenism of return’. There cannot be a new ecumenism based upon there being exceptions for EENS, in Vatican Council II. Unitatis Redintigratio 3, the Decree on Ecumenism, Vatican Council II, does not contradict Feeneyite EENS.Nothing in the Decree on Ecumenism contradicts Feeneyite EENS.

So we are no more obliged to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally like Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar, Murray, Balthazar, Bea, Lefebvre and Kung. Theology and philosophy have returned to the Scholastic period, the Middle Ages, that golden time in the history of the Catholic Church.

 Muslims in general are oriented to Hell without Catholic faith and the baptism of water(AG 7).This is a Conciliar teaching and not just a personal view. It is Magisterial according to Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Church teachings over the centuries.

Mohammad knew about the Catholic Church and yet formed another religion. According to Lumen Gentium 14 those who know about Jesus and the Church and yet do not enter are on the way to Hell.

LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical and invisible cases in 1965-2023. We cannot see a baptism of desire case. If anyone was saved outside the Church in invincible ignorance, seeds of the Word, good and holy things in other religions or elements of sanctification and truth in other religions, it would only be known to God. These are not objective exceptions for EENS in our human reality. As Ann Barnhardt says, 'technically they exist only on paper'. So there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict Ad Gentes 7 or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus,according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215).

POPE HONORIOUS AND THE ORDER OF PREACHERS

This Church Council during the time of Pope Honorius,  approved the Order of Preachers of St. Dominic Guzman. It did not mention any exceptions. The Council has a hermeneutic of continuity with the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed and on EENS according to the Council of Florence (1442). The Council of Florence was Feeneyite.

 POPE FRANCIS SUPPORTS THE BOLOGNA SCHOOL

But Alberto Melloni's FSCIRE (Bologna School) which is financed by the Italian Government, with a million euros annually, and which is supported by Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II irrationally.

For them, LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to physically visible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church without faith and the baptism of desire. So Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition. But for me there is no  rupture with the traditional concept of EENS and the rejection of Mohammadism.

It is known that Mohammad’s concept of the cosmos, the human body and the Trinity was wrong. Also translations of the Quran in different languages have different meanings, example, in Urdu, English, Arabic etc. So in the name of Vatican Council II ( irrational), Catholics must not be expected to accept the Quran as a religious book equal to the Bible..- Lionel Andrades

https://bussola-pro.com/835535/biblioteca-la-pira-www-fscire-it

Sailing (Helmut Lotti LIVE on Sahabat Pelangi)

Be Thou My Vision - Catholic Music Initiative - Dave Moore, Lauren Moore

God We Praise You - Catholic Music Initiative - Dave Moore, Lauren Moore

Holy Is His Name - Catholic Music Initiative - Dave Moore, Lauren Moore

Morning Has Broken

Be Thou My Vision - Catholic Music Initiative - Dave Moore, Lauren Moore

Alessandro Pajno an Italian Magistrate and politician is promoting a political library on Islamism at Palermo, supported by Alberto Melloni and the FSCIRE and funded by the Italian Government in which they interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds and other Magisterial Documents irrationally to present a liberal and ‘open’ interpretation of the Catholic faith.This is dishonest.

Alessandro Pajno  an Italian Magistrate and politician is promoting a political library on Islamism at Palermo, supported by Alberto Melloni and the FSCIRE and funded by the Italian Government in which they interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds and other Magisterial Documents irrationally to present a liberal and ‘open’ interpretation of the Catholic  faith.This is dishonest.

The library in Palermo is administered by the Board of Directors of FSCIRE, chaired by Professor Alessandro Pajno, and follows a few clear principles: scientific excellence, which makes us think of dissemination as a consequence of knowledge, not as a substitute for it; a system of top-level international relations, which through the network of the European Research Infrastructure of Religious Sciences enhances Italian leadership and visibility; full independence from universities and religious communities, which avoids opportunistic conditioning and allows for rigorous and open competitions.

https://www.fscire.it/lang/eng/heritage/biblioteca-la-pira

 

 

It is not scientific when the FSCIRE of Alberto Melloni interprets Vatican Council II with a fake premise and inference and calls it 'scientific'. There is no denial from Melloni or Francesca Cadeddu who feature on Radio Radical.

Since 2018,( at the Giorgio Pira Library, Palermo, Italy ) librarians and researchers have established, and continue to establish, collaborations and relationships with major institutions in numerous countries, including Albania, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Bosnia, China, Egypt, Russian Federation, Jordan, Dubai, Kazakhstan, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Lebanon, Libya, Mali, Morocco, Malaysia, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Syria, Sudan, Tanzania, Tunisia, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, USA, and Yemen. The collaborations are aimed at the acquisition of duplicates, rare items and gifts, following in the footsteps of the great libraries of Islamic tradition.

https://www.fscire.it/lang/eng/186

 

The librarians and researchers are presenting a political version of the Catholic Faith to Muslim scholars.

The library in Palermo is administered by the Board of Directors of FSCIRE, chaired by Professor Alessandro Pajno, and follows a few clear principles: scientific excellence, which makes us think of dissemination as a consequence of knowledge…

 

The interpretation of Vatican Council II by the FSCIRE and the Giorgio Pira library is irrational and not rational. This is unethical.

 

In 2019, La Pira Library began a number of projects, including: hosting the International Biennial Conference 2021, held by IQSA - The International Quranic Studies Association; hosting the permanent exhibition of the photographic exhibition on Egypt and Yemen, created and curated by Professor Giovanni Canova.

According to Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation while LG 14, LG 16 etc refer to hypothetical and invisible cases in 1965-2023 and so do not contradict Ad Gentes 7 or the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845,846) which says outside the Church there is no salvation and that the Catholic Church is like the Ark of Noah that saves in the Flood and God the Father wants all to enter for salvation (CCC 845). The Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q, 27), which is not contradicted by Vatican Council II, interpreted rationally, says other religions are not paths to salvation. Muslims need Catholic faith and the baptism of water to avoid Hell is the Conciliar teaching. Muhammad died without faith and baptism. This information is not disseminated.

According to pre and post Vatican Council II traditional theology there is exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church and Mohammad ignored this information and founded a new religion. According to Vatican Council II, those who know about the Catholic Church and do not enter are lost forever (LG 14).

Inter-religious dialogue is good and it must be encouraged by the truth about Catholic teachings must also be made known.

According to Vatican Council II all the non Christians working at the Giorgio Pira Library, Palermo, are oriented to Hell without Catholic faith and the baptism of water (AG 7, LG 14). This is the official teaching of the Church. This is the Magisterial teaching of the Catholic Church and not a personal view only.

Francesca Cadeddu is a researcher at Alberto Melloni’s FSCIRE,the President of the European Academy of Religion and is a researcher at the University of Moderna Regina-Emilia. I have mentioned before that she interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and unethically and writes books in praise of John Courtney Murray, who did the same. There is no denial from her. Murray, like Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar, Lefebvre and Kung interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally.

They will continue to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and present their liberal version to Muslim scholars.While controversial Muslim scholars and speakers, some who have been associated with the Pontifcal Institute for Arabic and Islamic Studies (PISAI), Rome will have their writings documented at the Pira Library in Palermo.  -Lionel Andrades

 SEPTEMBER 28, 2023

Alberto Melloni’s FSCIRE (Bologna School) continues to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and unethically and is calling for research papers on Islamism. There is no denial from Melloni and the FSCIRE staff.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/09/alberto-mellonis-fscire-bologna-school.html

https://www.fscire.it/lang/eng/186

On Eagles Wings

Whatsoever You Do To The Least of My People

The Kelly Family - Peace On Earth (Official Video)

Angelo Kelly & Family - We Shall Overcome (2018)

Veni Creator Spiritus - Inno gregoriano allo Spirito Santo in latino

Soul of my Savior By James Kilbane

I Surrender All

Galilee Song

Daruj nam mir - Dona la pace - Give us your peace

Alberto Melloni’s FSCIRE (Bologna School) continues to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and unethically and is calling for research papers on Islamism. There is no denial from Melloni and the FSCIRE staff.

 Alberto Melloni’s FSCIRE (Bologna School) continues to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and unethically and is calling for research papers on Islamism. There is no denial from Melloni and the FSCIRE staff. They are not telling researchers to interpret Vatican Council II without the irrational premise, inference and false conclusion. According to Vatican Council II all need faith and baptism for salvation from Hell (AG 7). Muslims do not have Catholic faith and the baptism of water. In general they are oriented to Hell according to Vatican Council II (AG 7). The Catechism of the Catholic Church says outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation(846). The Catechism (846) cites AG 7 and LG 14). 

For the FSCIRE LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to physically visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church in the present times. So there are explicit examples of salvation outside the Church which are objective exceptions for Ad Gentes 7 and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215 on EENS.

For me LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc alwayes refer to only hypothetical and invisible cases in the present times. So they are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings. They are not objective exceptions for the dogma EENS and Ad Gentes 7. Vatican Council II has the hermeneutic of continuity with EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. The Council does not contradict the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q, 27Q). This is the rational way to interpret Vatican Council II.

The FSCIRE does not choose this rational way since it does not want to affirm the dogma EENS and then say that all Muslims in general are outside the Church without faith and the baptism of water. They would need to believe in Jesus in the Catholic Church to avoid the fires of Hell ( for salvation).

So with a new theology, a fake theology based upon the invisible people are visible premise, there is dialogue with Islamic researchers and leaders. They are not told the truth about the Catholic Faith.- Lionel Andrades

from the FSCIRE website

2023 Call for Research Fellowships

FSCIRE invites applications for Postdoctoral Fellowships for the “Giorgio La Pira” Library and Research Centre on the History and Doctrines of Islam (Palermo).
Find out the Call for Research Fellowships

Call for Papers - Palermo Occasional Papers
Islamic History, Doctrines and Sources (PaOP)

Palermo Occasional Papers – Islamic History, Doctrines and Sources (PaOP) is a multidisciplinary and international journal that plans to contribute to scientific research on Islamic history, doctrines, hermeneutics, literatures, languages, relations, institutions, perception and cultures.
With its international editorial board and a standard selection process (double-blind peer review), the journal welcomes unpublished papers and invites submissions from researchers in all Islamic traditions working on Oriental languages and manuscripts. In addition to first-hand research articles, PaOP also accepts notes, documents and book reviews. It is published mainly in English.
For more information, click here.

DREST – Corso di Dottorato di Ricerca di interesse nazionale in Studi Religiosi

È indetta la procedura selettiva per l’ammissione al Corso di Dottorato di Ricerca di interesse nazionale in Studi Religiosi, di seguito DREST, XXXIX ciclo (2023/24-2025/2026).

Per maggiori informazioni consultare il bando

2023 Call for Research Fellowships

FSCIRE invites applications for Postdoctoral Fellowships for its Bologna centre.
Fellowships are established in accordance with requirements defined by the policy of FSCIRE, its agreements with the Italian Ministry of University and Research and its donors.
Candidates may there by apply for the following position:
• Junior Research Fellow (2 years, renewable).
Applicants must have obtained their doctorate within the last five years. The successful candidate will sign a research contract for two years, equivalent to the Italian “Assegno di ricerca junior” (which amounts to a monthly net sum of about €1,700). The contract defines a research programme in accordance with the research lines of FSCIRE.
We invite applications from all over the globe, provided that the applicant fluently speaks English.
For more information, see the call for applications.

Bando catalogazione libro moderno Biblioteca G. Dossetti

È indetta una selezione, per titoli e colloquio, di un/a catalogatore/catalogatrice da impiegare con contratto di collaborazione coordinata e continuativa alla catalogazione bibliografica del libro moderno presso la Biblioteca specialistica G. Dossetti della Fondazione per le Scienze Religiose.

Per partecipare alla selezione è richiesto l’invio della domanda in carta semplice con cv allegato tramite e-mail segreteria@fscire.it e in cc biblioteca@fscire.it o posta ordinaria all’indirizzo della Fondazione per le Scienze Religiose, via San Vitale 114, 40125 Bologna.

La domanda dovrà pervenire entro le ore 12:30 del 23 febbraio 2023 (in caso di invio via posta, non farà fede il timbro postale).

Per maggiori informazioni consultare il bando.

Terminata la fase di valutazione dei curricula e in seguito ai colloqui in risposta al bando di selezione per la stipula di un contratto di collaborazione coordinata e continuativa per la catalogazione del libro moderno della Biblioteca Dossetti, la commissione ha ritenuto idonea la candidata: Lisa Giacopelli.

Bibliotecario/a su fondo librario in lingua araba presso la Biblioteca La Pira sulla storia e le dottrine degli islam (Palermo)

È aperta la selezione per il conferimento di un posto di bibliotecario/a presso la Biblioteca e Centro di Ricerca Giorgio La Pira.
Le candidature possono essere inviate a segreteria@fscire.it entro e non oltre le ore 14 del giorno 30 novembre 2022.
Per maggiori informazioni consultare il bando.

Diversamente "mendicanti". Genesi e fenomenologie di un nome e di una realtà tra XIII e XIV secolo

Il fascicolo dei Qsrm dedicato al tema Diversamente “mendicanti” sarà il 2, 2024. In base alla numerosità delle proposte ricevute, sarà possibile anche impegnare il fascicolo 1, 2025. La consegna dei saggi, per essere sottoposti a revisione, è prevista entro ottobre 2023 (un eventuale secondo fascicolo prevede una consegna al febbraio 2024). I termini per la proposta di adesione al progetto sono fissati al 30 giugno 2022. Entro tale data dovrà pervenire ai curatori editoriali (Maria Teresa Dolso e Andrea Tilatti) una proposta di titolo con una breve descrizione della ricerca. Oltre che in italiano, i saggi potranno essere redatti in inglese, francese, spagnolo. Orientativamente i saggi (salvo diverse esigenze) possono consistere in 60.000 caratteri (spazi e note inclusi) seguendo le norme editoriali dei Qsrm, che saranno inoltrate a tutti i collaboratori. Sarà possibile fornire illustrazioni, carte, grafici, in accordo con i curatori editoriali. I curatori editoriali sono a disposizione per ogni ulteriore chiarimento.
Per maggiori informazioni consultare il bando e la bibliografia di orientamento.

Manifestazione di interesse per l’inserimento lavorativo di un soggetto disabile ai sensi dell’art. 11 L. n.68/99 presso la Biblioteca La Pira

La Fondazione per le scienze religiose presso la sede della Biblioteca e centro di ricerca Giorgio La Pira di Palermo realizza un programma di assunzioni rivolto a soggetti disabili iscritti negli elenchi di cui alla L. n. 68/99 per complessive n.1 unità, che siano iscritti presso il CPI di Palermo e che presentino una certificazione di invalidità del 46% minimo. L’assunzione sarà effettuata tramite un contratto di lavoro subordinato a tempo determinato della durata minima 7 mesi, con orario di lavoro part-time da 25 ore settimanali.
Il contratto prevede l’espletamento delle mansioni di impiegato amministrativo addetto al servizio di aiuto bibliotecario.
Le domande dovranno pervenire entro e non oltre il 30 aprile 2022 all’attenzione del dott. Gianmarco Braghi all’indirizzo braghi@fscire.it e in cc maktaba@fscire.it.
Graduatoria.

Bibliotecari lingua araba e persiana, Biblioteca La Pira (Palermo)

È aperta la selezione per il conferimento di due posti di bibliotecario (lingua araba e lingua persiana) presso la Biblioteca e Centro di Ricerca Giorgio La Pira.
Le candidature possono essere inviate a segreteria@fscire.it entro e non oltre le ore 14:00 del 10 aprile 2022.
Per maggiori informazioni consultare il bando.
Graduatoria.

Catalogazione in SBN del fondo antico della Biblioteca Dossetti

È aperta la selezione, per titoli e colloquio, di un catalogatore da impiegare con contratto di collaborazione coordinata e continuativa alla catalogazione in SBN del fondo antico della Biblioteca Dossetti.
Per partecipare è richiesto l’invio della domanda con cv allegato a segreteria@fscire.it e in cc a  biblioteca@fscire.it o posta ordinaria in via San Vitale 114, 40125 Bologna.
La domanda dovrà pervenire entro le ore 12:30 del 15 febbraio 2022.
Per maggiori informazioni consultare il bando.

Terminata la fase di valutazione dei curricula e in seguito ai colloqui in risposta al bando di selezione per la stipula di un contratto di collaborazione coordinata e continuativa per la catalogazione del fondo antico della Biblioteca Dossetti, la commissione ha ritenuto idoneo il candidato: Gianluca D’Elia.

International Qur’anic Studies Association 2022

È aperta la call for paper dell'incontro annuale dell'International Qur’anic Studies Association (IQSA), che sarà ospitato dalla Biblioteca La Pira a Palermo dal 5 al 7 settembre 2022. Le proposte di presentazione, su argomenti che riguardano il testo coranico, devono essere inviate a iqsa@fscire.it entro il 7 marzo 2022.
Per maggiori informazioni consultare il bando.
Per informazioni su organizzazione dei panel contattare Alba Fedeli e Devin Stewart.
Per informazioni su aspetti logistici contattare Francesca Badini.
Per informazioni su registrazioni e pagamenti scrivere a contactus@iqsaweb.org.

International fellowship

È sempre aperta la call dell’International fellowship.
Tutti i dettagli qui.

Call chiuse

FSCIRE e Banca d’Italia offrono una Postdoctoral felloswhip sul tema Teologia, pensiero economico e prassi commerciali. Feneratio, ribā e tasso d’interesse fra cristianesimo e islam.

Il bando.
La graduatoria.

Marie Sklodowska-Curie Individual fellowship

Il bando.

Call for Research fellowships

Call 2021/2.
Graduatoria.

Call 2021/1.
Graduatoria.

Call 2020 for Senior research fellowship 2020.
Graduatoria.

Call 2019 for Postdoctoral fellowship.

Call 2018.
Graduatoria.

Call 2017.
Graduatoria.

https://www.fscire.it/ricerca/call-e-bandi

_____________________________________

SEPTEMBER 25, 2023

Francesca Cadeddu is a researcher at Alberto Melloni’s FSCIRE.She does not know about Vatican Council II (rational), interprets the Council unethically and writes books on religious illiteracy

 Francesca Cadeddu is a researcher at Alberto Melloni’s FSCIRE,the President of the European Academy of Religion and is a researcher at the University of Moderna Regina-Emilia. She interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and unethically and writes books in praise of John Courtney Murray, who did the same.Murray, like Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar, Lefebvre and Kung interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally.

She features on leftist TV in Italy and would be welcome at any of the pontifical universities like the Biblicum, which also interpret Vatican Council II with the common fake premise, inference and non traditional conclusion.

She has written books on fighting religious illiteracy, while she does not seem to know that the Council can be interpreted rationally and is in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of Pope Honorious and the Order of Preachers in 1215.

Melloni is the founder of the European Academy of Religion. Since 2020 he has been the Chief Scientific Advisor of the European Commission according to his biodata. His interpretation of Vatican Council II is as irrational and unscientific as that of Ursula Von der Leyden, the President of the European Union.There is no denial from the FSCIRE, the EU or the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. - Lionel Andrades 

https://www.fscire.it/card-1619078544

https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/people/francesca-cadeddu

https://www.religiousstudiesproject.com/persons/francesca-cadeddu/

___________________________________________________

SEPTEMBER 24, 2023

Intentionally the FSCIRE and the European Union choose a false premise and inference. This is even after they are informed.

 Euractiv Italia | EURACTIV Italia

 13 lug 2023

 Professor Alberto Melloni, membro della Fondazione per le scienze religiose

 Giovanni XXIII (FSCIRE) e European Commission Chief scientific advisor,

 interviene sulle sfide e le opportunità tra religione e Unione Europea in 

occasione del dibattito organizzato 

il 9 maggio per la festa dell’Europa.

Alberto Melloni and the FSCIRE correspondents and staff agree with me. The FSCIRE and the European Union have been interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally i.e. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, do not refer to hypothetical and invisible cases in 1965-2023 for them. They are physically visible cases. Only in this way they can be made exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). So for the FSCIRE and EU , LG 8,14,15,16 etc, are objective examples of salvation outside the Church and are  practical exceptions for the dogma EENS. This is irrational and it is their mistake.There are no denials or clarifications from the FSCIRE. For me LG 8 etc refer to invisible cases. This is common sense. They are not objective exceptions for the dogma EENS, for me.

The FSCIRE and the European Union have all these years interpreted LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc as being physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church. This was their false premise. So they inferred that these cases were practical exceptions for the dogma EENS, which had become obsolete. This was their irrational premise and inference.It was irrational and unscientific.

For me LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 etc, refer to hypothetical cases only. They cannot be physically visible in 1965-2023.If anyone is saved outside the Catholic Church it could only be known to God. We cannot say that any particular person has been saved or will be saved with the baptism of desire (LG 14) and invincible ignorance (I.I). No one saw St. Emerentiana in Heaven without the baptism of water.

So for me, Vatican Council II does not mention any exceptions for the dogma EENS and the Athanasius Creed, which says all need the Catholic faith for salvation. Vatican Council II has the hermeneutic of continuity with the Syllabus of Errors and the Catechisms of Pope Pius X and Trent. The Councils supports the past exclusivist ecclesiology. There is no rupture with the ecclesiocentrism of the missionaries of the 16^th century.

The interpretation of Vatican Council II by the FSCIRE (Bologna School) is now obsolete.It is political.It is not Catholic. It is unethical. Since intentionally the FSCIRE chooses a false premise and inference. This is even after they are informed.

Vatican Council II has to be interpreted only rationally and so there cannot be a New Theology, New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology, New Evangelization and New Canon Law. Since this New Theology is based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and this is dishonest. The New Theology separates Jesus from the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation.It does this with alleged exceptions for EENS. 

But now we know that the Council no more has exceptions for the dogma EENS. So there no more is a separation (  when speaking about salvation) between Jesus and the Catholic Church. Membership in the Catholic Church is needed for salvation.It is not enough to believe in Jesus, according to the Christian denonominations.

So how can Alberto Melloni and the European Union, with their books, articles and reports on Vatican Council II, project the Council as a break with Tradition and then give the green light for liberalism, like homosexual unions?

Vatican Council II is no more ‘a revolution’ in the Church but a continuation with Tradition. The Ratzinger liberal theology made a mistake. It had its foundation upon the error in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston. This Letter, projected invisible cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance, as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. This remained the error of the popes from Pius XII to Francis and the European Union and Alberto Melloni follow it. All the reports and videos on the Vatican website follow this mistake.This is being tacitly acknowledged by Alberto Melloni.  - Lionel Andrades

SEPTEMBER 23, 2023

Ursula von der Leyden who has been accused of plagiarism in the past is now interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and unethically and there is no denial from Alberto Melloni, Secretary of the FSCIRE (Bologna School) and neither from the Cardinal-Archbishop of Bologna, Matteo Zuppi

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/09/ursula-von-leyden-who-has-been-accused.html

SEPTEMBER 21, 2023

Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Union and Alberto Melloni, Director of the FSCIRE are still interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. This is unethical.It is deceptive.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/09/ursula-von-de-leyen-president-of.html

SEPTEMBER 17, 2023

Alberto Melloni (FSCIRE- Bologna School) and Ursula Von Leyden in this video are interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and unethically

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/09/alberto-melloni-fscire-bologna-school.html

SEPTEMBER 13, 2023

All the books on Vatican Council II written by Alberto Melloni, of the FSCIRE and those published by the SSPX’s Angelus Press, are authored with the irrational and not rational premise. There is no denial from the FSCIRE or the SSPX.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/09/all-books-on-vatican-council-ii-written.html

Healing Prayer at Medugorje 27.09.2023

 

                                                                                                             https://marytv.tv/healing-prayer/

Catholic Answers is not telling the truth to Catholics so that their apologists can be politically correct with the Left.

 

 JULY 23, 2023

Trent Horn says that Protestants and other Christians are part of the Catholic Church because of their baptism even though they do not have Catholic faith and do not accept the Sacraments. This is a new doctrine. It is possible for him to say this since he interprets Vatican Council II (UR 3 etc) irrationally.

Trent Horn says that Protestants and other Christians are part of the Catholic Church because of their baptism even though they do not have Catholic faith and do not accept the Sacraments. This is a new doctrine. It is possible for him to say this since he interprets Vatican Council II (UR 3 etc) irrationally.

Trent Horn says that Protestants and other Christians are part of the Catholic Church because of their baptism even though they do not have Catholic faith and do not accept the Sacraments. This is a new doctrine. It is possible for him to say this since he interprets Vatican Council II (UR 3 etc) irrationally.

Vatican Council II says Protestants can be saved in ‘imperfect communion’ ( UR 3) and God has not restricted them from salvation.UR 3 states this, since outside the Church there is known salvation was the new teaching of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office. It was accepted by Pope Paul VI.

So   Rahner, Ratzinger, Bea and others at Vatican Council II, in principle, believe that outside the Catholic Church there is known salvation. They allege irrationally that  there are personally known non Catholics saved.In other words there are visible people saved without the baptism of water.The dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus was made obsolete in 1949-Boston by the Americanists.

But we know practically, there can be no known case of a Protestant being in Heaven  who is saved outside the Catholic Church. In our human reality there is no such person visible - who can contradict the dogma EENS.

So it is wrong for Trent Horn to interpret LG 15 as a visible case in 1965-2023 and an exception for the dogma EENS.We do not know any one in particular who is saved in imperfect communion with the Catholic Church ( UR 3 etc). It is wrong to assume that the Mystical Body of Christ exists in general, outside the visible boundaries of the Church .There are no objective cases. It is irrational for him to suggest that there is known salvation outside the institutional Church. We do not know of any such case in 2023.

The 1949 mistake of the Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO) was repeated by Rahner and Ratzinger in 1965.This is unacceptable.The 1949 LOHO was irrational, non traditional, heretical and schismatic.

For me LG 8,14,15 and 16 refer to hypothetical cases.So there is nothing in the text of Vatican Council II to contradict the Athanasius Creed.This Creed says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation. All need Catholic faith and the baptism of water for salvation ( AG 7, LG 14). All.So Vatican Council II ( AG 7, LG 14)  does not exclude Catholic faith.

Without the Catholic Sacraments, Protestants cannot be saved. They are outside the Church without Catholic faith.The Council is saying that only the baptism of water is not sufficient. Since over time a person can commit mortal sins of faith in ignorance or other reason. The Catholic Church is the Mystical Body of Christ and this does not include all the Christian denominations.

This is the Conciliar teaching when UR 3 etc are interpreted only rationally i.e invisible cases are invisible and not visible.

There were some or many in 1965  who were using the New Theology of the 1949 LOHO, based upon the invisible-visible confusion, to suggest that there is known salvation outside the Catholic Church.So it was wrongly inferred that there are objective exceptions for the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.

Trent Horn is interpreting Vatican Council II with this hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.I interpret the Council with the hermeneutic of continuity with the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors , the Catechism of Pope Pius X and the rest of Tradition.

For me UR 3 is not break with Tradition as  cited by Brother Peter Dimond.LG 8,14, 15 and 16 are also only hypothetical cases. So they cannot be objective exceptions for EENS in 2023.- Lionel Andrades

JULY 22, 2023

Like Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the Prefect of the CDF, Catholic Answers interprets Vatican Council II irrationally. They also reject the Church Councils and Church Fathers on EENS and the reference to Tradition by Brother Peter Dimond

In this video Trent Horn is irrational and political. He is projecting Lumen Gentium (8, 14, 15,16 etc) as being physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church in 1965-2023.So for him these are exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). So he criticizes Brother Peter Dimond.

But Peter Dimond corrects Trent Horn by quoting traditional sources, which do not mention any exceptions.

HOW CAN LUMEN GENTIUM 8,14,15 & 16 REFER TO PHYSICALLY VISIBLE CASES

How can Lumen Gentium 16 for example, refer to a physically visible non Catholic saved outside the Church? How can it be a visible exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) ?.Common sense tells us that these are  invisible cases for us human beings.They can only be  known to God. For us humans these are only hypothetical and theoretical cases. But this was not known to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith when they issued their Letter to the Archbishop of Boston with reference to Fr. Leonard Feeney. It was also not known to the CDF in 1965. The CDF did not interpret Vatican Council II rationally.

The Church Fathers interpreted the baptism of desire , baptism of blood etc rationally like me and not irrationally like Jimmy Akins and Trent Horn

So like Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the Prefect of the CDF, Catholic Answers interprets Vatican Council II irrationally They also reject the Church Councils on EENS which Brother Peter Dimond quotes.

• Since they interpret Vatican Council II irrationally they are also interpreting the Creeds irrationally.The Athanasius Creed is made obsolete by Catholic Answers. The Creeds are connected to the interpretation of Vatican Council II. This is a discovery.

Trent Horn interprets Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition but for me there is continuity with Tradition.

Catholic Answers accepts the 1949 Letter of the CDF which confuses invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.I avoid this mistake.

I AVOID THE INVISIBLE PEOPLE ARE VISIBLE CONFUSION

So for me what Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar, Murray, Kung, Ottaviani, Bea and Lefebvre said or did at Vatican Council II is irrelevant. Since I can interpret Vatican Council II rationally in harmony with Feeneyite EENS. I simply avoid the invisible people are visible confusion. The Council then supports EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) of Pope Honorius III.It  did not mention any exceptions. This was the understanding  EENS also of St. Dominic Guzman and his friends who founded the Dominican Order at that time.

The Bible supports the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus. It is Feeneyite like Brother Peter Dimond and not Cushingite, like it is for Catholic Answers.

WHEN I MEET A HINDU, BUDDHIST OR SIKH

So when I meet Hindus, Buddhists or Sikhs I know that they are oriented to Hell without faith and baptism (AG 7, LG 14, CCC 845,846, 1257). Catholic faith and the baptism of water are the ordinary means of salvation. I cannot know of any extraordinary means of salvation.Only God can know of an extraordinary means of salvation.

Since ethically, Vatican Council II can only be interpreted rationally, there can only be the past exclusivist ecclesiology at Mass, in Latin or the vernacular. We have only one interpretation of the Council and it is rational. With the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) today the same as it was for the missionaries in the 16^th century, we can only have the lex orandi of the past. Since the Council is in harmony with the ecclesiology of the 16^th century Roman Missal. The New Missal does not affirm the dogma EENS since it interprets Vatican Council II rationally.

AN APOLOGIST HERE  CHANGES THE INTERPRETATION OF THE CREEDS

How can an apologist of Catholic Answers be called Catholic, when he changes the interpretation of the Creeds etc for political - Left reasons? This is ideological and not Catholic.

Peter Dimond did not correct him on this point since the Most Holy Family Monastery also interprets the baptism of desire (BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I)  irrationally and so Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition for him too.

AT VATICAN COUNCIL II THE ATTACK WAS ON EENS

At Vatican Council II the attack was on EENS. They thought they could get rid of the salvation dogma by re-interpreting invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I as being visible examples of salvation outside the Church. So there were allegedly known people, non Catholics, saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.

So there are many statements in Vatican Council II based upon this error. Otherwise why would they have to mention LG 8, 14, 15 and 16?

The popes only have teaching authority today when they affirm the strict interpretation of  extra ecclesiam nulla salus like the Church Councils. It is not magisterial or apostolic to re-interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance irrationally to produce a rupture with the popes and saints over the centuries on the salvation dogma.There is no teaching authority when Vatican Council II is interpreted irrationally.

However, we have undone their bad work. Their bad philosophy and theology which is not Catholic can be replaced. We have made Rahner, Congar, Ratzinger, Balthazar and others obsolete now. We now have to go back to the old moral and faith theology. Since the New Theology and New Ecclesiology is based upon Vatican Council II irrational. So we are not obliged to follow them.

CATHOLIC ANSWERS WOULD ONLY BE MAGISTERIAL WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL 

Pope Francis, the cardinals, bishops and Catholic Answers  would be Magisterial on Vatican Council II only when they interpret the Council rationally. They are irrational presently.

When they interpret the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms irrationally they are not magisterial. Instead they are heretical and schismatic. This is a mortal sin of faith.

Jimmy Akins and Trent Horn and the other apologists at Catholic Answers are also unethical when they choose an irrational premise (invisible people are visible, LG 16 refers to a visible non Catholic saved outside the Church), irrational inference (LG 8, 14, 16 etc are visible examples of salvation outside the Church and so are objective exceptions for the dogma EENS) and  non-traditional conclusion (Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition, EENS, original interpretation of the Creeds etc). 

I CHOOSE THE ETHICAL OPTION

I choose the ethical option. I choose a rational premise (invisible people are invisible, LG 16 refers to an invisible non Catholic saved outside the Church), irrational inference (LG 8, 14, 16 etc are invisible examples of salvation outside the Church and so are non objective. Invisible cases cannot be practical exceptions for the dogma EENS. I choose the rational and  non-traditional conclusion (Vatican Council II is not a rupture with Tradition ( EENS, original interpretation of the Creeds etc).It has the hermeneutic of continuity with the Fourth Lateran Council II ( 1215) and the Council of Florence (1442)  which defined the dogma EENS.  

Catholic Answers is not telling the truth to Catholics so that their apologists can be politically correct with the Left.        -Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/07/message-incomplete-in-this-video-trent.html