Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Vatican Council II without the Cushing premise supports a Catholic State

The main objection to a Catholic State cited by secularists is Vatican Council ( without the  Richard Cushing premise).Without the Richard Cushing Error Vatican Council II affirms the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus  the basis for a Catholic State.
With Vatican Council II mirroring the dogma extra eccleisam nulla salus there is a moral necessity to proclaim ,there is only one true faith and all need  to enter it visibly for salvation.
So for a Catholic all areas of life must center on Jesus as known and taught in the Catholic Church.
For a Catholic this must be the focus of all social and political legislation.Since, Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church says outside the  church there is no salvation.
This is the Catholic Faith expressed in faith and morals, social and political activity.
There is no separation of one's faith and daily living in all its aspects. Jewish Left organisations(SPLC; ACLU, ADL etc.) oppose this concept. They interpret Vatican Council II mixing up in principle statements as being de facto and known to us .
So Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the past. It contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors, the  Catechism of the Catholic Church and Tradition in general.
The secularists have also politically opposed a separation of church and state, which is contrary to the Catholic ethos, according to Tradition and the text of Vatican Council without the mix up of implicit -explicit statements,.
The Jewish Left( opposed by good Jews, Orthodox Jews) are politically opposed to the Kingship of Christ the King, that Christ should be the centre over all society.
So Vatican Council II (without the premise) affirms the Social Reign of Christ the King . This would be opposed by them through leftist laws. Without the mix up of in theory and in practise(in reality) for the Left, Vatican Council II would be racist, anti Semitic , proselytism etc.
So their media, like the the news agency Reuters, always interprets the Council as ' a revolution', a break with the past etc. Reuters also wants the SSPX to accept this interpretation of the Council.
They have been supported by Catholics who choose to interpret the Council mixing up dejure and defacto statements and consider themself 'liberal' and 'progresivist'.
-Lionel Andrades
_____________________________________________


In Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II the following text marked in red are in principle statements. When they are assumed to be de facto (known in reality) statements they change the interpretation of Vatican Council II.

Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it."(17) Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him-AG 7

To assume in principle statements are defacto exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is the Richard Cushing Error.It also implies that one can physically see the dead now saved in Heaven in invincible ignorance etc for them to be exceptions to the need for all to convert visibly into the Catholic Church.

With the Richard Cushing Error Ad Gentes 7 also contradicts itself since it says 'all' need 'faith and baptism' for salvation .However  some do not ( in reality)   need faith and baptism since they are saved in invincible ignorance etc, cases physically visible and personally known to us for them to be exceptions to all needing to enter the Church.

The false premise of the visible-dead, results in the Council being a break with the dogma on salvation and Tradition. Vatican Council II also contradicts itself and The Principle of Non Contradiction. A similar  pattern is seen clearly also  in Lumen Gentium 14.

Similarly in principle statements, which are commonly confused  are, 'seeds of the Word' (AG 11), 'imperfect communion with the Church' (UR 3) etc.

____________________________________________

Photo of Pope John XXII who initiated the traditional Vatican Council II and is to be canonised.He is projected well by the leftist Times magazine, whose editors interpret Vatican Council II with the Richard Cushing Error and assume it is a break with the past and give credit also to Pope John XXIII.

Vieni dal Libano Canto Neocatecumenale


I have found it! There was a song in the Neo Cathechumenale Way which I liked. I found it finally on Youtube! There is also a rendition by Kiko Arguello, the founder of The Way.

Come from Lebanon (Vieni dal Libano Canto Neocatecumenale ) From the Canticle of Canticles.