Sandra Mazzolini, a liberal Italian professor of Ecclesiology at the Urbaniana Pontifical University, Rome is selling her book on the subject of outside the Church there is no salvation in which she is unethically using a false premise to create a rupture with the traditional strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). There is a rupture with EENS as it was interpreted by St.Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine. Her appointment has been approved by the Left

 

Sandra Mazzolini, a liberal Italian professor of Ecclesiology at the Urbaniana Pontifical University, Rome is selling her book on the subject of outside the Church there is no salvation in which she is unethically using a false premise to create a rupture with the traditional strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). There is a rupture with EENS as it was interpreted by St.Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine. Her appointment has been approved by the Left. She makes sure that no student at the Urbaniana will receive an academic degree who does not interpret  Vatican Council II by projecting unknown cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc, as being personally known examples of salvation in the present times (1965-2020) and so alleged objective exceptions to exlusive salvation in the Catholic Church. -Lionel Andrades

Maike Hickson would make no progress if she would write on the issue of Pope Benedict's false New Theology, which he still defends.Since all the German bishops and cardinals use the New Theology to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS

Maike Hickson would make no progress  if she would write on the issue of Pope Benedict's false New Theology, which he still defends. Since all the German bishops and cardinals use the New Theology to interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). The New Theology became official with the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO). It was used at Vatican Council II. So every one in general today  is following the official error in the Catholic Church. 

The German bishops have to be shown that without Pope Benedict's New Theology there is no basis for their liberalism. Since Vatican Council II interpreted without the New Theology would not be a rupture with EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.

Now the German cardinals and bishops will not affirm the Syllabus of Errors and will cite Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise, the New Theology.So when meeting the German bishops this has to be clear for Maike Hickson. -Lionel Andrades

Pope Benedict's New Philosophy ( invisible people are visible) and New Theology ( outside the Catholic Church there is known salvation so all do not need to be Catholic for salvation) creates a rupture between faith and reason. The old faith is put aside with his 'new reasoning' based upon a false premisece

 Pope Benedict's New Philosophy ( invisible people are visible) and New Theology ( outside the Catholic Church there is known salvation so all do not need to be Catholic for salvation)  creates a rupture between faith and reason. The old faith is put aside with his 'new reasoning' based upon a false premise. -Lionel Andrades

The whole Church is using Pope Benedict's false New Theology and we need to catch the bull ( the lie ) by the horns

 The whole Church is using Pope Benedict's false New Theology and we need to catch the bull ( the lie ) by the horns.. - Lionel Andrades

We've discovered how Pope Benedict's false New Theology works. This will be a crisis for the liberals. We have found the Missing Link. We have broken the code

 

We've discovered how Pope Benedict's false New Theology works. This will be a crisis for the liberals. We have found the Missing Link. We have broken the code. -Lionel Andrades

 

DECEMBER 7, 2020

When Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) without the false premise ' Rome will come back to the Faith'. There is nothing in Lumen Gentium to contradict the strict interpretation of EENS. Pope Francis needs to announce this.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/when-pope-francis-interprets-vatican.html

This New Information on how the false premise decides the hermeneutic of rupture or discontinuity with Tradition, is being given out my me. This is the job of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith

 

This New Information on how the false premise decides the hermeneutic of rupture or discontinuity with Tradition, is being given out my me. This is the job of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. -Lionel Andrades

 DECEMBER 12, 2020

We have new information and it is here only on this blog

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/we-have-new-information-and-it-is-here.html

______________________

APRIL 28, 2018

How can LG 8 be an exception to EENS Cardinal Ladaria ?

APRIL 28, 2018

No denial from the Vatican, SSPX or Paulist Fathers : they all still agree with me

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/no-denial-from-vatiacan-sspx-or-paulist.html

_________________________

 SEPTEMBER 26, 2018

Ask the CDF (Graphics)

-





Lionel Andrades

____________________

JANUARY 14, 2019

Legally Archbishop Morandi cannot claim that invisible non Catholics are visible exceptions to EENS (Graphics)

- Lionel Andrades

 

(The above graphic was made in 2o18.It applies also to  2020)

 

FEBRUARY 1, 2020

We can affirm Vatican Council II without the Ratzinger theology ( Graphics)

-Lionel Andrades

Meditation on Hell in the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius of Loyola

 

Meditation on Hell in the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius of Loyola 

FIFTH EXERCISE

IT IS A MEDITATION ON HELL

It contains in it, after the Preparatory Prayer and two Preludes, five Points and one Colloquy:

Prayer. Let the Preparatory Prayer be the usual one. 

First Prelude. The first Prelude is the composition, which is here to see with the sight of the imagination the length, breadth and depth of Hell. 

Second Prelude. The second, to ask for what I want: it will be here to ask for interior sense of the pain which the damned suffer, in order that, if, through my faults, I should forget the love of the Eternal Lord, at least the fear of the pains may help me not to come into sin. 

First Point. The first Point will be to see with the sight of the imagination the great fires, and the souls as in bodies of fire. 

Second Point. The second, to hear with the ears wailings, howlings, cries, blasphemies against Christ our Lord and against all His Saints. 

Third Point. The third, to smell with the smell smoke, sulphur, dregs and putrid things. 

Fourth Point. The fourth, to taste with the taste bitter things, like tears, sadness and the worm of conscience. 

Fifth Point. The fifth, to touch with the touch; that is to say, how the fires touch and burn the souls. 

Colloquy. Making a Colloquy to Christ our Lord, I will bring to memory the souls that are in Hell, some because they did not believe the Coming, others because, believing, they did not act according to His Commandments; making three divisions...

- The Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius of Loyola, [1914] http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/seil/seil15.html

_____________________________________________________

The entrance it seems to me was similar to a very long and narrow alleyway, like an oven, low and dark and confined; the floor seemed to me to consist of dirty, muddy water emitting foul stench and swarming with putrid vermin...The bodily pains were so unbearable that though I had suffered excruciating ones in this life and according to what doctors say, the worst that can be suffered on earth for all my nerves were shrunken when I was paralyzed, plus many other sufferings of many kinds that I endured and even some as I said, caused by the devil, these were all nothing in comparison with the ones I experienced there...-St.Teresa of Avila's description of Hell.

http://www.tldm.org/news6/hell3.html

________________________________________________

DECEMBER 5, 2020

Our Lady showed Sister Lucia a sea of fire in Hell. The same was seen by Sister Faustina Kowalska. The visionaries Vicka and Jacob at Medugorje were also shown Hell fire by Our Lady. Hell is the First Secret of Fatima

STUFF HAPPENS...GO TO CONFESSION NOW WHILE YOU CAN : There are millions of people in Hell today who thought they had one more day to repent.

There are millions of people in Hell today who thought they had one more day to repent. 
from Dympha Road
http://dymphnaroad.blogspot.it/2016/09/stuff-happensgo-to-confession-now-while.htm

DECEMBER 5, 2020

Mirjana the Medugorje visionary says that she was not shown Hell by Our Lady. She heard about Hell from the other two visionaries, Vicka and Jacob whom Our Lady took to Hell and showed them the suffering there with fire

 

I Walked in Hell Aileen Baxley

Mormon Lady Went to Hell

Seer at Medugorje : I Saw Hell

 

Seer: I Saw Hell

Seer: I Saw Hell

May 9, 2019 by sd

From La Luce di Maria:
Here is the interview that Jakov released to Father Livio of Radio Maria, talking about his trip to Hell:
JAKOV: Yes. Just thinking back to hell, I get …
PADRE LIVIO: Do you get chills?
JAKOV: I get chills and I just feel bad.
FATHER LIVIO: Do you feel bad about it? But what did you see, what did you see, so at a glance at the first moment?
JAKOV: We saw a fire. (…) The moment I looked I saw a fire and inside the fire …
FATHER LIVIO: Was the fire great?
JAKOV: Yes. And I’ve seen people, but they weren’t people. He was a kind of people who transformed, and then immediately I …
FATHER LIVIO: What turned into what?
JAKOV: In a type of animal.

https://spiritdailyblog.com/news/seer-i-saw-hell

________________________________________________

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/search/label/Hell

If a pope, cardinal, bishop or priest interprets the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance with a false premise to change the meaning of the Nicene Creed, reject the Athanasius Creed and the thrice defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus it is an impediment to offering Holy Mass. They are in mortal sins of faith and it is a scandal

 If a pope, cardinal, bishop or priest interprets the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance with a false premise to change the meaning of the Nicene Creed, reject the Athanasius Creed and the thrice defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus it is an impediment to offering Holy Mass. They are in mortal sins of faith and it is a scandal. -Lionel Andrades

Our two liberal popes, who use a false premise to interpret the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance, will offer Mass at Christmas and the New Year negating the Great Commission ( with exceptions).Invisible and unknown non Catholics saved allegedly outside the Church will be presented as exceptions to the need to proclaim Christ with the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation

 Our two liberal popes, who use a false premise to interpret the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance, will offer Mass at Christmas and the New Year negating the Great Commission ( with exceptions).Invisible and unknown non Catholics saved allegedly outside the Church will be presented as exceptions to the need to proclaim Christ with the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation. - Lionel Andrades

The two popes are interpreting Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus with a false premise and the people do not know about it. Otherwise they would have asked the pontiffs to be honest and not change Jesus' teachings to please the world

 The two popes are interpreting Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus with a false premise and the people do not know about it. Otherwise they would have asked the pontiffs to be honest and not change Jesus' teachings to please the world. - Lionel Andrades

The College of Cardinals have to be informed that there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II. One is rational and the other is irrational. The conclusion is a continuation with Tradition ( rational interpretation) or a discontinuity with Tradition ( irrational interpretation)

 The College of Cardinals have to be informed that there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II. One is rational and the other is irrational. The conclusion is a continuation with Tradition ( rational interpretation) or a discontinuity with Tradition ( irrational interpretation). - Lionel Andrades

With the New Theology all hypothetical cases mentioned in Vatican Council II are confused as known non Catholics saved outside the Church. This is irrational. We humans cannot know of any such people

 With the New Theology all hypothetical cases mentioned in Vatican Council II are confused as known non Catholics saved outside the Church. This is irrational. We humans cannot know of any such people. -Lionel Andrades

The mistake in the New Theology was to assume that there was known salvation outside the Catholic Church. This was false. There cannot be any exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). Since only God can know if someone is saved outside the Catholic Church without the Sacraments.We personally cannot know of anyone

 The mistake in the New Theology was to assume that there was known salvation outside the Catholic Church. This was false. There cannot be any exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). Since only God can know if someone is saved outside the Catholic Church without the Sacraments.We personally cannot know of anyone. -Lionel Andrades

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) Vatican, must inform the pontifical universities that before students write their final thesis they must know that there is a Vatican Council II with and without the false premise and the conclusion will be different

 

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) Vatican, must inform the pontifical universities that before students write their final thesis they must know that there is a Vatican Council II with and without the false premise and the conclusion will be different. - Lionel Andrades

Archbishop Lefebvre was correct on Vatican Council II being a rupture with Tradition. He correctly detected a New Theology. He could see the effect, the results. But he did not know it was the false premise in the New Theology which was doing the damage. He did not know this since, he was interpreting extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with the same false premise

 Archbishop Lefebvre was correct on Vatican Council II being a rupture with Tradition. He correctly detected a New Theology. He could see the effect, the results. But he did not know it was the false premise in the New Theology which was doing the damage. He did not know this since, he was interpreting extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with the same false premise.

The baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance were exceptions to EENS for him. This was false reasoning.

Yet this seems the principal reasoning at Vatican Council II.

Fifty -five years later and it is still not known to Catholic leaders. -Lionel Andrades

Archbishop Lefebvre was correct. Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise was not Catholic.Instead of agreeing with him Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger excommunicated him. Their interpretation of Vatican Council II was irrational and heretical

 Archbishop Lefebvre was correct. Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise was not Catholic.Instead of agreeing with him Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger excommunicated him. Their interpretation of Vatican Council II was irrational and heretical. -Lionel Andrades

When Catholics in Rome begin interpreting Vatican Council II without the false premise Archbishop Lefebvre's dream will come true i.e Rome will come back to the Faith

 When Catholics in Rome begin interpreting Vatican Council II without the false premise Archbishop Lefebvre's dream will come true i.e Rome will come back to the Faith. - Lionel Andrades

So many things in the Church were propped up by Vatican Council II and the edifice was built upon a false premise

 So many things in the Church were propped up by Vatican Council II and the edifice was built upon a false premise. -Lionel Andrades

Pope Benedict wanted a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. He did not want to interpret Vatican Council II like me. He still does want a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition

 Pope Benedict wanted a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. He did not want to interpret Vatican Council II like me. He still does want a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition. Now whenever someone refers to Vatican Council II point out the difference between the two interpretations of the Council-one rational and the other irrational- and then correct the error. -Lionel Andrades

Correct the premise and the mainline Catholic Church will become traditional again.

 

JULY 29, 2020

Correct the premise and the mainline Catholic Church will become traditional again.

-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2020-07-29T16:59:00%2B01:00&max-results=7

JULY 29, 2020

When the premise is wrong then the conclusion is non traditional : this is a common fault in the Catholic Church

-Lionel Andrades

Signore grazie perché mai ci abbandoni, come tua e nostra Madre Maria

Repost : Bishop Schneider interprets the Creeds with the false premise and then offers Holy Mass. He does not end the scandal.

 

JULY 30, 2020

Bishop Schneider interprets the Creeds with the false premise and then offers Holy Mass. He does not end the scandal.

-Lionel Andrades

____________________

JULY 30, 2020

Bishop Schneider could interpret Vatican Council II like me. It's rational and traditional. It's without the false premise

-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/07/bishop-schneider-could-interpret.html

_______________________

 JULY 30, 2020

If you consider LG16 explicit and I consider it implicit our interpretation of Vatican Council II will be different.

-Lionel Andrades