So really they are all affirming the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church, since morally, they must choose only the rational interpretation of the Council and not the Alberto Melloni (Bologna School), irrational version, which is political and not Catholic.

 

The entire parish of Sant Agapito, Largo Preneste, near Termini, Rome, affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, ‘the Feeneyite version’, when they interpret Vatican Council II rationally. They are not aware of this.

All the members of the choirs would agree that LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc refer to invisible and unknown people in 2024.

All the Scouts would agree that we cannot see or meet someone saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) or the baptism of desire (LG 14) etc. If anyone was saved as such it would only be known to God, they would agree.

 So for the Catechists LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are only hypothetical cases. They are not part of our human reality in 2024.

So the Parish Priest, Fr. Paolo Boumis and his assistant priests, would affirm Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation and there are no exceptions in the baptism of desire or being saved in invincible ignorance for them. There are no exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) mentioned in Vatican Council II, for them.

They would also affirm the other orthodox passages in Vatican Council II, which support the dogma EENS and there would be no exceptions for them in Vatican Council II.

So really they are all affirming the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church, since morally, they must choose only the rational interpretation of the Council and not the Alberto Melloni (Bologna School), irrational version, which is political and not Catholic.  -Lionel Andrades

FEBRUARY 1, 2024

So when the pope and the parish priest interpret Vatican Council II rationally they are Feeneyite whether they know it or not, whether they like it or not. When anyone interprets Vatican Council II rationally the Council emerges exclusivist it says outside the Church there is no salvation

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/02/pope-francis-like-fr.html

JANUARY 31, 2024

Pope Francis is forced to interpret Vatican Council II rationally, for it to be Magisterial

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/01/pope-francis-is-forced-to-interpret.html

JANUARY 31, 2024

The Parish Priest at San Agapito, Rome can no more say that he does not affirm ‘the strict interpretation ‘ of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). He cannot say that he does not accept Unam Sanctum of Pope Boniface VIII (founder of La Sapienza University, Rome). Since he is obliged to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and then the Council is Feeneyite. The orthodox passages in Vatican Council II support the past ecclesiocentrism. While the hypothetical passages are not exceptions. It is the same for Feeneyite Pope Francis.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/01/the-parish-priest-at-san-agapito-rome.html

So when the pope and the parish priest interpret Vatican Council II rationally they are Feeneyite whether they know it or not, whether they like it or not. When anyone interprets Vatican Council II rationally the Council emerges exclusivist it says outside the Church there is no salvation.

 

Pope Francis like Fr. Paolo Boumis, Parish Priest, Sant Agapito, Rome, has to interpret Vatican Council II rationally i.e. Lumen Gentium 16 refers to an invisible person in 2024, then the orthodox passages in the Council (Ad Gentes 7, Lumen Gentium 14 etc) are in harmony with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church, while LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are not exceptions for AG 7. LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc are always hypothetical.

So Pope Francis like Fr. Boumis, is saying all need faith and baptism for salvation (AG 7) and outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation (CCC 845,846, LG 14).

For both of them, the other religions are not paths to salvation (Catechism of Pope Pius X , 24 Q, 27Q, which is not contradicted by Vatican Council II).

All Catholics are expected to interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church rationally and the conclusion is ecclesiocentric, orthodox and traditional. There is continuity with the Apostles, the Church Fathers and the Jesuits of the Middle Ages.

When anyone interprets Vatican Council II rationally the Council emerges exclusivist it says outside the Church there is no salvation.

So when the pope and the parish priest interpret Vatican Council II rationally they are Feeneyite whether they know it or not, whether they like it or not. -Lionel Andrades