Archbishop Carlo Vigano and Dr. Taylor Marshall do not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and ask the political parties in Italy to have Jesus in the Catholic Church at the center of all politics

 

MAY 26, 2022

Archbishop Carlo Vigano and Dr. Taylor Marshall do not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and ask the political parties in Italy to have Jesus in the Catholic Church at the center of all politics

 

Archbishop Carlo Vigano and Dr. Taylor Marshall do not interpret Vatican Council II rationally. They also do not ask the political parties in Italy (Fratelli Italia, Lega Salvini etc) to affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).Upon EENS was based the theological proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation. The priority to save souls from going to Hell, was also the non separation of the Catholic Church and the Catholic State.

I INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY

This is what I believe today.Since I interpret Vatican Council II, rationally. So when I meet a non Catholic I know he is oriented to Hell. Since, this is the teaching of the Catholic Church only when Vatican Council II is interpreted with a Rational Premise.Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation while LG 8,14 and 16 are hypothetical and invisible cases in 2022.So they do not contradict Ad Gentes 7.

Ad Gentes 7 is in harmony with Feeneyite EENS. So we have a de fide teaching of the Church (EENS) supported by Vatican Council II (Rational). This is the Conciliar Church interpreted rationally (Creeds, Catechisms etc). This is not just a personal view, a private opinion.

Vigano and Marshall do not interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise (invisible people are invisible).So they do not ask Pope Francis, Georgia Melloni and Matteo Salvini to do the same. Instead they choose to interpret Vatican Council II with the False Premise (invisible people are visible. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 refer to visible non Catholics saved outside the Church in 2022).They remain politically correct with the Left. 

In Vatican Council II they project false exceptions for Tradition (EENS, Syllabus etc ).They also  reject Vatican Council II ( Rational) which would be in harmony with the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16^th century, Italy.

VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL IS THE SOURCE OF LIBERALISM IN THE CHURCH

 Vatican Council II (Irrational, with the False Premise) is the source of the present liberalism and modernism in Italy. It is an official break with the historical Catholic Church with it historical culture.

Georgia Melloni, Silvio Berlusconi and Matteo Salvini do not know about the False Theology. No one is telling them about it. They do not know that the False Premise is being used by the popes, cardinals and bishops to please the Left. So the whole Church, people in general, re-interpret Vatican Council II unethically and irrationally. All the members of these political parties in ignorance - are doing the same.

Italians are not told that with Vatican Council II (Rational) there is no rupture with the old theology. Since there are no practical exceptions mentioned in the Council-text for the old teaching on exclusive salvation being there, in only the Catholic Church.

PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW

The people do not know that with Vatican Council II (Rational) we return to Traditional Mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Church and then we can then proclaim Jesus at the center of all political legislation. We proclaim the Kingship of God at the center of all politics. We do not have to believe Pope Benedict when he says that there are exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II.There are exceptions only with Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise.

So that the people know, and the Church comes back to Tradition, it would be helpful if Archbishop Carlo Vigano would affirm Vatican Council II (Rational-invisible non Catholics are invisible in 2022) and admit that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre made a mistake.

He wrongly interpreted Vatican Council II with the False Premise like Pope Paul VI and the popes who followed. Now the Society of St. Pius X and the liberals are following the same mistake. There is no one to tell the people the truth.-Lionel Andrades

 MARCH 8, 2022

The Social Reign of Christ the King must be proclaimed in all politics and all walks of life since Vatican Council II supports extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/archbishop-carlo-vigano-and-dr-taylor.html

 

Virgin Mentions ‘Spirit Of Division’

May 26, 2022 by sd

Medjugorje:

May 25, 2022 “Dear children! I am looking at you and thanking God for each of you, because He permits me to still be with you, to encourage you to holiness. Little children, peace is disturbed and Satan wants peacelessness. That is why, may your prayer be even stronger so that every unclean spirit of division and war may be stilled. Be builders of peace and carriers of joy of the Risen One in you and around you, for the good to win in every man. Thank you for having responded to my call.”

[resources: Medjugorje messages]

https://spiritdaily.org/blog/news/virgin-mentions-spirit-of-division

There are two interpretations of Vatican Council II / C e due interpretazione di Concilio Vaticano II (Graphics)

 

 MAY 27, 2022

There are two interpretations of Vatican Council II / C e due interpretazione di Concilio Vaticano II (1)

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/there-are-two-interpretations-of_27.html

MAY 27, 2022

There are two interpretations of Vatican Council II / C e due interpretazione di Concilio Vaticano II ( 2)

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/there-are-two-interpretations-of_63.html

MAY 27, 2022

Now we can check that liberalism in the Catholic Church

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/blog-post.html

MAY 27, 2022

The hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition comes from the Right Hand Side Column

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/blog-post_27.html

MAY 27, 2022

Vatican Council II is dogmatic it supports Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/blog-post_62.html

MAY 27, 2022

The Four Marks of the Catholic Church with or without the False Premise ?

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/blog-post_59.html

 MAY 27, 2022

Germany can interpret Vatican Council II like Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall and throw away the books of Pope Benedict

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/blog-post_60.html

MAY 27, 2022

Once you have discovered the Specific Error in Vatican Council II and can avoid it the Council is an ally of Tradition : the popes did not know this

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/blog-post_82.html

MAY 27, 2022

Vatican Council II's Specific Error, its break with Tradition comes from the Right Hand Side Column

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/blog-post_9.html

 MAY 27, 2022

Traditionis Custode interprets Vatican Council II with visible-baptism of desire. Bsihop Athanasius Schnedier and Dr. Taylor Marshall say there are no visible cases

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/blog-post_19.html

MAY 27, 2022

Bishop Athanasius Schneider indicates that all the books on Vatican Council II, in general, are obsolete with the False Premise

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/blog-post_16.html

-Lionel Andrades

_______________ 

_______________

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE LIONEL ANDRADES INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II

1.What's so special about the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II ?

It does not use the common fake premise.It's a simple, rational and different way to read Vatican Council II.

2.What's so special about the Lionel Andrades interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)?

It does not use the common false premise to interpret the baptism of desire(BOD), invincible ignorance(I.I) and the baptism of blood(BOB).So there are no practical exceptions for EENS.EENS is traditonal and BOD, BOB and I.I are interpreted rationally.It's not EENS or BOB,BOB and I.I. Since the latter are not exceptions for the former.

3.Is the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Magisterial documents copy writed or trademarked? 

No. Any one can use it. There is no charge.It is simply going back to the traditiional interpretation of Church documents, without the false premise. The false premise came into the Church in a big way, with the Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney(1949).

4.How did the Lionel Andrades interpretation of VC 2 emerge?

He kept writing on his blog on EENS and then discovered that Vatican Council II does not really contradict EENS if the false premise is avoided.

5.Is the LA interpretation of VC2 a new theology?

No. It is going back to the old, traditional theology of the Catholic Church by avoiding the false premise.It is the false premise which has created the New Theology.Without the false premise there cannot be the New Ecumenism, New Evangelisation, New Ecclesiology etc.The New Theology is Cristocentric without the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church.Since exceptions were created to EENS, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors etc, by projecting a false premise.The error was overlooked by the popes.

6.What about traditional, 16th century Mission doctrine?

With the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II we return to traditional Mission doctrine. It is no more 'only they need to enter the Church who know about it', who are not in invincible ignorance(LG 14) Instead, it is all need to enter the Catholic Church with no known exception.Invincible ignorance is not an exception to all needing to enter the Church with faith and the baptism(LG 14).So we evangelize since all non Catholics are oriented to Hell without faith and the baptism of water( Ad Gentes 7/Lumen Gentium 14, Vatican Council II. The norm for salvation is faith and baptism and not invincible ignorance.When I meet a non Catholic, I cannot assume or pretend to know, that he or she is an exception to the norm. If there is an exception it could be known only to God.I know that the non Catholic before me, is oriented to Hell( Athanasius Creed, Vatican Council II(AG 7, LG 14),Catechism of the Catholic Church(845,846,1257),Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, etc).

7.What about the hermeneutic of continuity or rupture with Tradition ?

With the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II there is no rupture with past Magisterium documents and neither do they contradict each other.We have to re-interpret past Magisterial documents though, which mention the baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance(I.I), as being hypothetical and invisible always.Being saved with BOD and I.I are always physically invisible, when they are mentioned in the Catechisms( Trent, Pius X etc) and encyclicals and documents of the popes(Mystici Corporis etc).They always refer to hypothetical cases only and are not objectively known non Catholics.If someone is saved outside the Church he or she could only be known to God.This has to be clear when reading also the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston.There is also no confusion when reading the text of Vatican Council II.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3,NA 2,GS 22 etc, refer always to only hypothetical cases and so they do not contradict the Athanasius Creed.

8.Should the popes use the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II ?

YES! Since presently the two popes are schismatic, heretical, non Magisterial and non traditional on Vatican Council II.It has to be this way since they use the false premise.It is only with the false premise, inference and conclusion that they interpret Magisterial documents. This can be avoided with a rational premise, inference and traditional conclusion.The result is a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.

9.What other advantage is there in knowing the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II ?

We read the text of Vatican Council II in general differently with the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.

’The red is not an exception to the blue’.The hypothetical passages( marked in red on the blog Eucharist and Mission, are not practical exceptions to the orthodox passages in Vatican Council II which support EENS, and are marked in blue.

For the present two popes and the traditionalists the red is an exception to the blue. This is irrational.

10.What bearing does it have on the liturgy ?

Without the false premise the Council is traditional. Vatican Council II is in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the missionaries in the 16th century.So we are back to the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. When the Council is traditional there is no 'development of doctrine' or 'sprit of Vatican Council II'. Collegiality, Religious Freedom and ecumenism are no more an issue. So receiving Holy Communion on the hand can no more be justified with Vatican Council II.Neither can the Eucharist be given to the divorced and re-married, in the name of the Council.

Neither can the German Synod be justified by citing Vatican Council II.There is no theological basis in the Council, any more, for given the Eucharist to Protestants during Holy Mass.

11.What is the essence of this interpretation?

It is the listing of the rational and irrational premise, inference and conclusion. It identifies  two different premises with two different conclusions. So the rational premise produces a traditional conclusion and the Vatican Council II is in harmony with Tradition. It has a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition even though Rahner, Congar, Rarzinger and Cushing were present at the Council in 1965.

Collegiality, ecumenism and religious liberty are no more an issue for the conservatives , when Vatican Council II is traditional.  

 Lumen Gentium 8, Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 ecc. oin Vatican Council II refer to only physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.

12.Vatican Council II is dogmatic ?

Yes. Pope Paul VI and the liberals call Vatican Council II "pastoral" and not dogmatic. Since they do not want to affirm the rigorous interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). 

 Ad Gentes 7 (all need faith and baptism for salvation) supports the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) while the hypothetical cases mentioned in LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NS 2, GS 22 etc.  cannot be objective exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 in 1965-2021. So there is nothing in the text of the Council that contradicts 16th century EENS or the Athanasius Creed or the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX on there being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.

The Second Vatican Council affirms the dogma EENS with Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 .While the Council does not contradict EENS or Ad Gentes  7 and Lumen Gentium 14, with LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 etc. Since if someone was saved outside the Church, he would be known only to God. They are not part of our reality. They are invisible in 1965-2021.

When Pope Francis says that the Second Vatican Council is the Magisterium of the Church he must refer to a pro-EENS dogmatic Council with the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.

Without their false premise the Council is dogmatic. It supports the rigorous interpretation of EENS.This was EENS according to the missionaries and the Magisterium of the sixteenth century. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NS 2, GS 22 etc., in the Second Vatican Council, if interpreted rationally, cannot be practical exceptions to EENS. Invisible cases in our reality cannot be objective exceptions to EENS. For example, to get on the bus you have to be present at the bus station. If you are not physically at the bus stop it is not possible to get on the bus.

Another example is, if there is an apple in a box of oranges, the apple is an exception since it is there in the box. If it was not there in that box it would not be an exception. Similarly LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3 etc.,refer only to hypothetical cases. We cannot meet or see anyone saved outside the Church, without faith and the baptism of water. So the Council is not referring to real people, known people in the present times.

Unknown and invisible cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14) and of being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) cannot be objective exceptions for EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.There is no conflict.

So when Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally it is dogmatic. -Lionel Andrades

Fake premise

Lumen Gentium 8,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.

Fake inference

They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.

Fake conclusion

Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.

Here is my interpretation of Vatican Council II in blue.

Rational Premise

LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.

Rational Inference

They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.

Rational Conclusion

Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.

The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/there-is-no-denial-from-congregation.html   

JUNE 14, 2021

Catholic Faith

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 25, 2018

If you interpret Lumen Gentium 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth in other religions) as referring to known or unknown people in the present times you have two interpretations of Vatican Council II : If you interpret the baptism of desire as referring to invisible or visible people saved outside the Church in the present times you have two interpretations of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

Comment on the blog Catholic in Brooklyn

We can always count on the infallibility of Church doctrine.

Lionel:

If you interpret Lumen Gentium 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth in other religions) as referring to known or unknown people in the present times you have two interpretations of Vatican Council II.

If you interpret the baptism of desire as referring to invisible or visible people saved outside the Church in the present times you have two interpretations of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

You are presently interpreting LG 8 as a rupture with EENS and this is your irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS.One of two interpretations.

You are also interpreting the baptism of desire (BOD) as an example of salvation outside the Church and an exception to EENS, this is your irrational interpretation of EENS and BOD.

You are denying the infallibility of the popes ex cathedra who defined EENS in three Church Councils.

Like the present liberal Magisterium you are saying that what was once an 'infalllible teaching' is no more infallible and you have the support of the Left and the Vatican.-Lionel Andrades

APRIL 24, 2018

Vatican Council II is not how Christopher Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei interpret it (Graphics)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/vatican-council-ii-is-not-how_24.html

 APRIL 24, 2018

There are no physically visible cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I in 2018 or LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc so Vatican Council II is not a rupture with Tradition(Graphics)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/there-are-no-physically-visible-cases.html

APRIL 24, 2018

"There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I in 2018" nor " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases " so Vatican Council II does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors (Graphics)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/there-are-no-physically-visible-cases_41.html

APRIL 24, 2018

"There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I in 2018" and " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases ", Vatican Council II is not a rupture with an ecumenism of return (Graphics)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/there-are-no-physically-visible-cases_24.html

BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE

Rational Premise

The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically invisible cases in 1949-2021

They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.

Rational Inference

They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.They are not examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.

Rational Conclusion

They do not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.They do not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.

The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.

__________

VATICAN COUNCIL II

Fake premise

Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 14(Baptism of Desire), Lumen Gentium 16 (Invincible ignorance) etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.

Fake inference

They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.

Fake conclusion

Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.

Pope Paul VI and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, made an objective error.

VATICAN COUNCIL II

Rational Premise

 Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium  14 and Lumen Gentium 16  in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.

Rational Inference

They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.

Rational Conclusion

Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.

The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-L.A

______________________________________

__________________  

MAY 19, 2022

It was not known to them that Vatican Council II could be interpreted with a Rational Premise and the Conclusion would change and that they were using a False Premise

 

                                                                                      -Lionel Andrades

MAY 19, 2022

Social Reign of Christ the King and Vatican Council II (Rational)

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/social-reign-of-christ-king-and-vatican.html

__________________________________ 

MAY 19, 2022

The past moral theology is not contradicted by Vatican Council II, Rational.

 

                                                                                                                                                                     -Lionel Andrades

MAY 19, 2022

With Vatican Council II Rational we are back to the old theology and so also the old faith theology and also the old moral theology.The Council affirms the past ecclesiocentrism

 

                                                                                                                                                                               -Lionel Andrades

Francis talks feminism with global moral theologian network

Mar 22, 2017

by Joshua J. McElwee

 

Vatican

VATICAN CITY — Pope Francis met for nearly an hour last week with seven representatives of a global network of about 1,000 moral theologians, speaking with them on the role their work plays in helping people understand the deeper roots of Catholic teachings.

Among the topics discussed in the first such meeting between a pontiff and the leaders of Catholic Theological Ethics in the World Church: how different countries are receiving Francis' apostolic exhortation Amoris Laetitia, the moral teachings behind his encyclical Laudato Si', and differing Catholic perspectives on feminism. 

https://www.ncronline.org/news/vatican/francis-talks-feminism-global-moral-theologian-network

MAY 19, 2022

(Repost) Cardinal Luiz Ladaria could begin a dialogue with the sedevacantists CMRI and MHFM and invite them into the Church, as he did for the SSPX. Since with Vatican Council II (rational) there is no more reason to remain in sedevacantism because of the Council.  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/repost-cardinal-luiz-ladaria-could.html

__________________  

MAY 19, 2022

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria is expected as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and not the common False Premise.He is presently dishonest. With the Rational Premise there is no rupture with the pre-1949 Magisterium of the Catholic Church  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-is-expected.html

 MAY 19, 2022

THE DECREE OF PRECEPTS AND PROHIBITIONS ISSUED BY THE CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH(CDF), VATICAN AGAINST BROTHER ANDRE MARIE MICM AND THE ST. BENEDICT CENTER, RICHMOND, NEW HAMPSHIRE, USA WAS FALSE.WAS IT ALSO ILLEGAL ?  HTTPS://EUCHARISTANDMISSION.BLOGSPOT.COM/2022/05/THE-DECREE-OF-PRECEPTS-AND-PROHIBITIONS.HTML

_______________________  

MAY 18, 2022 THE CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH (CDF), VATICAN AND CARDINAL PIETRO PAROLIN, SECRETARY OF STATE, VATICAN, WOULD PLACE SANCTIONS ON THE POLISH, AMERICAN AND OTHER BISHOPS CONFERENCES, IF THEY INTERPRETED VATICAN COUNCIL II AND EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS (EENS) WITH THE RATIONAL PREMISE, LIKE BROTHER ANDRE MARIE AND THE ST. BENEDICT CENTER, NH.  HTTPS://EUCHARISTANDMISSION.BLOGSPOT.COM/2022/05/THE-CONGREGATION-FOR-DOCTRINE-OF-FAITH.HTML

MAY 17, 2022

Orban can unite theology in the whole of Europe  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/05/orban-can-unite-theology-in-whole-of.html

MAY 9, 2022

We now see before us the whole Catholic Church coming back to Tradition at all rites and liturgies.

 

When now see before us the whole Catholic  Church coming back to Tradition at all rites and liturgies.

Since with the rational premise, Vatican Council II has what Pope Benedict called, the hermeneutic of continuity, with Tradition.-Lionel Andrades

WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF 

VATICAN COUNCIL II : YOURS AND MINE

Lionel Andrades

Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.

 Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?

Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Twitter : @LionelAndrades1

___________________