Vatican
Council II can only interpreted rationally whether one like it or not. So the
conclusion has to be traditional, whether we like it or not.
One
may not like it and call it ‘this’ or ‘that’ but the Council can only be
interpreted rationally and so there is a continuation with Tradition.
One may call the traditional conclusion rigid, extremist,
narrow, triumphalistic, etc but Vatican
Council II interpreted rationally produces this result.There is no other
ratinal choice.
Whether you go for the Novus Ordo, Latin, Greek Byzantine, Syro Malabar or Ambrosial Rite Mass… , Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise, has a continuity with Tradition.
We can no more interpret Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise, False Inference and non-traditional, heretical and schismatic conclusion. We can no more do it since people now know about it. They expect us to be honest.
In England Gavin D’Costa, a professor of theology at
the University of Bristol is a liberal and is allowed to attend Holy Mass in English.
Since he uses a False Premise to interpret Magisterial Documents and so creates
heresy and schism, like the cardinals and bishops in England and this is approved
by the Masons. They create division in the Church with the False Premise.
The old concept of being liberal or conservative based
upon the Mass in Latin or the vernacular (English/ Italian) is now obsolete.The
division does not come with the Latin Mass. The division really depends upon
the Fake or Rational Premise in theology. With the Fake Premise there is a New
Theology and with the Rational Premise we return to the old theology.
With the False Premise we create exceptions for the
Syllabus of Errors which really has
no exceptions in real life.
With the False Premise at the Latin Mass there is a theological
liberalism and with the Rational Premise
there is no liberalism at Holy Mass at all Mass.
With the Rational Premise we become traditionalists like
Jesus, in John 3:5 and Mark 16:16. Was Jesus a ‘triumphalist’ in Mark 16:16 when
he said those who do not believe will be condemned?
Was Jesus an extremist in John 3:5 when he said all need
the baptism of water for salvation? Of course not. He was telling us about
objective reality as it will be after we die. There is a Heaven and a Hell and
most people are outside the Catholic Church.
–Lionel
Andrades
APRIL 9, 2022
We have returned to the old lex orandi, lex credendi. Even Andrea Grillo in Rome has to go for the Novus Ordo Mass with the old theology. There is no other rational choice. Massimo Faggioli knows there is no way out
Posts
