Thursday, May 3, 2012

Solo la Chiesa Cattolica possiede e mezzi della pienezza di salvezza per andare subito in Paradiso dice Fra Volantino , Piccoli Frati Poveri e Suore Povere a Roma


Solo la Chiesa Cattolica possiede e mezzi della pienezza di salvezza per andare subito in Paradiso dice Fra Volantino a Roma (Aprile 30,2012). La Chiesa Cattolica e la via più sicura.
-Lionel







http://nuke.fratipoveri.net/HomeEnglish/tabid/376/Default.aspx

Father Leonard Feeney reportedly called the Archbishop and the Holy Office heretics: even today the CDF indicates there is a visible baptism of desire which contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II


The pope and the CDF are teaching factual errors

Fr. Leonard Feeney learnt about his excommunication through the newspapers. It is reported that when he met the Archbishop of Boston Cardinal Cushing he told the Archbishop that he was a heretic. He made the same charge against the Holy Office (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) and it’s Prefect.

We now realize, after so many years that the same heresy of the Archbishop is being held by Pope Benedict XVI (perhaps unknowingly) and the Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J. It has been expressed in Light of the World (Ignatius.p.107) and Christianity and the World Religions 1997 published by the International Theological Commission, Vatican.It's the heresy of their being explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7) with alleged visible- to- us cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. This was a rejection of the traditional literal interpretation of the thrice defined dogma.

While the dogma says everyone needs to convert the CDF says no, some do not. Even though the cardinals at the CDF do not personally know any exceptions they claim that invincible ignorance etc are explicit exceptions to the dogma.

Vatican Council II (AG 7) says all need Catholic Faith and the baptism of water for salvation. The CDF says it is not true. It believes there could be those saved with a good conscience or invincible ignorance (LG 16 is misquoted).

Dominus Iesus 20 says salvation is open to all but to receive it all need to enter the Church. The pope and the CDF assume that not all non Catholics in 2012 need to enter the Church. The pope goes a step forward in this irrationality and liberalism and says non Catholics do not have to convert into the Church in the present times. (Light of the World p.107).

So one cannot imagine the confusion that exists throughout the whole church. The present Teaching Authority of the Church is making an objective factual error.It is known in public.

This same error was made by the Archbishop of Boston when Fr. Leonard Feeney was alive. There was no apology made to Fr. Leonard Feeney. In fact he was penalized for speaking the truth about the Faith.

The pope and the CDF are teaching the same factual errors. It’s a fact that we don't know people saved in 2012 in invincible ignorance etc. So there is no contradiction to the literal interpretation of the dogma and the interpretation of Fr. Leonard Feeney. It's an objective fact that we cannot meet non Catholics saved with the baptism of desire. So the baptism of desire can never be an exception. It can only be a possibilty known to God. It can never be an explicit exception.

We do not reject the baptism of desire. We reject the claim of it being an exception. No magisterial document makes this claim but the CDF makes this wrong assumption.

We do not deny the possibility of someone being saved in invincible ignorance etc we just don't claim that they are exceptions the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and to Vatican Council II (AG 7)

Mortal sin, heresy and sacrilege are relevant also for popes, cardinals and bishops. Even they can go to Hell.

How can someone in the Profession of Faith recite the Nicene Creed and say "I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sin" and really mean three baptisms.

I respect the pope and Cardinals William Levada and Luiz Ladaria. I am just pointing out to a common sense error that can be identified by all and immediately corrected.

The CDF could announce that we do not know any particular case in the present times saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire and so there cannot be defacto, explicit exceptions to the dogma and Vatican Council II.

This issue has been known for a long time to many Catholics. Many priests to whom I have spoken to on this issue do not want to be quoted. Out of respect for the Holy Father they probably keep silent, or to protect their privileges and position. Many of them for speaking the truth in the interest of the Church are pejoratively called 'Feeneyites' by the secular media and the liberals. They have been explaining what I am saying in different ways.

The issue is also the Eucharst. How can someone in public heresy; a first class heresy with the rejection of the Nicene Creed, offer Holy Mass or receive the Eucharist?

-Lionel Andrades

_________________________________________