The relevant Italian Ministries must clarify that the President and Prime Minister do not interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents with a Fake Premise, to create a false and ideological break with Catholic Tradition.

 

The President and Prime Minister of Italy’s Oath of Office supports false pretensions and is dishonest. President Sergio Mattarella and Prime Minister Mario Dragi are posing as Catholics when they are not .This is an ethical issue. They use a False Premise to reject Catholic teachings. If they used the Rational Premise to interpret Magisterial Documents, they would have to affirm the past ecclesiocenterism of the Catholic Church. This would become a political and ideological issue and the lobby which supports them today would disown them. The Left would demand that they resign. Since they both would then be affirming the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church and would really be Catholics.

It is important to note that political leaders have been dismissed because of moral or criminal reasons. They were seen as dishonest or unethical.

The center right politician in France who was ahead of Macron in the polls before the elections, had to step aside when the administration found a fault in him. It is as unethical for Mattarella and Draghi to remain in office as alleged Catholics when they employ the False Premise, in public. The re-interpret Catholic de fide teachings and change their original meaning and are eligible to remain in office with this deception. This is not Catholic and neither is this honest. This is deception for political and anti-Catholic ideological reasons.

Also irrespective if Sergio Mattarella is a Catholic or not, he cannot use a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and reject the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church and pretend that this is the norm for a President of Italy. This is a public scandal.

So many center right politicians in Italy have been disqualified by the Italian judiciary from holding political office, including Mayors of Rome. They did not support the Masonic and Satanic ideology. Now why does the judiciary allow President Mattarella and Prime Minister, educated at Catholic institutions, to re-interpret Church Documents with a False Premise, change their meaning for ideological reasons and then take an Oath of Office as President and Prime Minister respectively ?

The relevant Italian Ministries must clarify that the President and Prime Minister do not interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents with a Fake Premise, to create a false and ideological break with Catholic Tradition.

-Lionel Andrades

Signore ci dispiace per tutti i nostri peccati, commessi opponendoci alla tua volontà: perdonaci

Medjugorje è la mia vita!!

Archbishop Arthur Roche, Andrea Grillo, Dr. Peter Kwasniewski and Dr.Joseph Shaw use the same False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II as a false break with Tradition, supporting the common liberalism

 

Archbishop Arthur Roche, Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments speaks at Sant’Anselmo’s Academic Inauguration

  

Archbishop Arthur Roche, Andrea Grillo, Dr. Peter Kwasniewski and Dr.Joseph Shaw use the same False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II as a false break with Tradition, supporting the common liberalism, and the Jewish Left. It is the False Premise which creates heresy and schism and a rupture between faith and reason. So Kwasniewski and Shaw cannot ask Roche and Grillo to interpret Vatican Council II with only the Rational Premise when they teach the liturgy and theology at the Benedictine University of St. Anselm, Rome.

If Kwasniewski and Shaw were rational in the interpretation of Magisterial Documents they could also ask Bishop Roland Minnerath at Dijone, France, to interpret Vatican Council II only with the Rational Premise at Mass in French.

This should be the norm for all rites in France. It should also be the norm for the diocesan priests who offer the Latin Mass there.

They could have asked Bishop Gian Carlo Perego to do the same in diocese of Commacchio-Ferrara, Italy where young traditionalist priests were transferred.

Similarly they could expect Bishop Stephen Lopes 

at the Anglican Ordinariate, who excommunicated 

Fr. Vaughn Treco, and Fr. Michael Nazir Ali, to do the same i.e. interpret Vatican Council II as having no exceptions for extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

They could affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with the baptism of desire not being an exception.They could affirm the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX with there being no known exceptions for an ecumenism of return.

They could affirm the Athanasius Creed with there being no exceptions for all to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.

They could affirm the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q,27Q-Outside the Church) with invincible ignorance ( 29Q) not being an exception and the Catechism of the Catholic Church with 847-848( invincible ignorance) not contradicting Ad Gentes 7 in CCC 846.It (AG 7) says all need faith and baptism for salvation and does not mention any known exceptions.   -Lionel Andrades

https://www.osb.org/2021/10/11/roche-speaks-at-santanselmos-academic-inauguration/

https://onepeterfive.com/mind-behind-motu-proprio/

Signore In questi momenti di vicinanza con Te,entra nei nostri cuori e donaci la Gioia e la Speranza

Gesù accresci la nostra Fede affinché possiamo essere coraggiosi dinnanzi alle difficolta della vita

Whether President Sergio Mattarella is a Catholic or not a Catholic, he is still using a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and there is no denial from his office.

 

There are two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational. The conclusion of the rational interpretation is traditional and that of the irrational non-traditional, heretical and schismatic. Pope Francis chooses the irrational interpretation and then justifies Amoris Laetitia and giving the Eucharist to the divorced and re-married, like Silvio Berlusconi. So with the theology and ecclesiology changed and the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II being cited as the cause of the change, it is asked by the liberals and Masons, why cannot moral theology also be changed ?

But the interpretation of Vatican Council II with the False Premise is unethical, it is immoral too. Yet this is the false interpretation of President Sergio Mattarella who the other day took an Oath of Office as the President of Italy, still suggesting that he is a Catholic.

Whether he is a Catholic or not a Catholic, he is still using a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and there is no denial from his office.

Based on Vatican Council II (Irrational) Matteralla and the liberals and Masons support LGBT mortal sins and pro abortion policies.

With the Fake Premise he rejects Magisterial Documents including the Athanasius Creed and this disqualifies him from claiming he is a Catholic. It also disqualifies Pope Francis from claiming he is the pope and a Catholic. They both need to correct the error and end the scandal.

Once they choose the Rational Premise, they return to the old theology and there are no practical exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II for the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc cannot be cited as practical exceptions any more for the Syllabus of Errors, by Pope Francis and President Sergio Mattarella.

To be a Catholic they need to accept Magisterial 

Documents and interpret them rationally.-Lionel Andrades

FEBRUARY 3, 2022

How can President Sergio Mattarella make an Oath of Office as a Catholic when he interprets Vatican Council II with a False and not Rational Premise ?

 

-Lionel Andrades

FEBRUARY 3, 2022

Is the Oath of Office of President Matterella valid? His office needs to issue a clarification saying that the interpretation of Vatican Council II with the False Premise is unethical even if the popes do the same.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/02/is-oath-of-office-of-president.html

"Cari figli, vegliate nella preghiera e siate decisi nel bene" - MEDJUGORJE