Monday, October 6, 2014

Synod on the Family teaches a New Gospel which St.Paul calls anathema

In today's First Reading at Holy Mass St.Paul tells the Galatians:

I am amazed that you are so quickly forsaking

the one who called you by the grace of Christ
for a different gospel (not that there is another).
But there are some who are disturbing you
and wish to pervert the Gospel of Christ.
But even if we or an angel from heaven
should preach to you a gospel 
other than the one that we preached to you,
let that one be accursed!
As we have said before, and now I say again,
if anyone preaches to you a gospel
other than the one that you received,
let that one be accursed!

Am I now currying favor with human beings or God?
Or am I seeking to please people?
If I were still trying to please people,
I would not be a slave of Christ.

Now I want you to know, brothers and sisters,
that the Gospel preached by me is not of human origin.
For I did not receive it from a human being, nor was I taught it,
but it came through a revelation of Jesus Christ.


There is a new Gospel being taught at the Synod of the Family 

The Apostle Paul appeals to this duty when he warns: “Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup” (1 Cor 11:28). Saint John Chrysostom, with his stirring eloquence, exhorted the faithful: “I too raise my voice, I beseech, beg and implore that no one draw near to this sacred table with a sullied and corrupt conscience. Such an act, in fact, can never be called 'communion', not even were we to touch the Lord's body a thousand times over, but 'condemnation', 'torment' and 'increase of punishment'”.
Along these same lines, the Catechism of the Catholic Church rightly stipulates that “anyone conscious of a grave sin must receive the sacrament of Reconciliation before coming to communion”.74 I therefore desire to reaffirm that in the Church there remains in force, now and in the future, the rule by which the Council of Trent gave concrete expression to the Apostle Paul's stern warning when it affirmed that, in order to receive the Eucharist in a worthy manner, “one must first confess one's sins, when one is aware of mortal sin”.
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/special_features/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_20030417_ecclesia_eucharistia_en.html

The Synod will recommend that Catholics in  mortal sin be given the Eucharist at Holy Mass. This is a new Gospel.
Pope Francis presides over an Oct. 4, 2014 prayer vigil for the Extraordinary Assembly for the Synod of Bishops on the Family. Credit: Daniel Ibáñez/CNA.
For centuries the Catholic Church taught that all need to be formal members of the Church for salvation.There were no exceptions.
Pope Francis and the cardinals at the Synod on the contrary believe all do not need to enter the Church the Catholic Church in October 2014 for salvation. Since for them there are known exceptions. There are people known to them who are saved this year without the baptism of water.There is known salvation outside the Church and they can name cases this year!
This is a new Gospel.
The Good News is that Jesus died for all people and all who accept Him in the Catholic Church and live the Gospel as interpreted by the Catholic Church, and so die without mortal sin, on their soul will be saved. They will not go to Hell.
This is no more taught. The Good News now is that Jesus is love and loves all people and every one must believe in Jesus and this is sufficient for salvation.
This is a new Gospel.
-Lionel Andrades

http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/pope-francis-ahead-of-synod-listen-to-the-beat-of-the-times-49942/

King's College,London uses an irrational premise in the interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

Kings College, London and the University of Bristol have a Department of Theology and Religious Studies, in which they reject the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with the irrationality of being able to see the dead now saved and who are alleged examples of salvation outside the Church.
Students Graduating

King's is home to one of the top 10 departments in the UK for Theology & Religious Studies (The Complete University Guide 2013). Located centrally in the heart of London, the College is ideally placed for sharing in, and playing an active role in, the academic and cultural life of the nation's capital.http://www.kcl.ac.uk/artshums/depts/trs/study/whykings.aspx

Annie Paish at Kings College, England in Dispelling the Myths about extra ecclesiam nulla salus 1  explains how up to the fourth century and the time of St.Augustine the Catholic Church taught that there was no salvation for those who had rejected the gospel AND for those who had not heard it .The reason was : Original Sin .
Then she makes a detour when she comes to St.Thomas Aquinas and refers to his 'changing views on those who had never been preached the gospel'.
Here we see the entrance of the irrational premise.
The man in the forest who is in invincible ignorance and who has not had the Gospel preached to him,for her, is a known exception in the present times, to all needing to convert into the Church for salvation.
This was a theoretical case which St.Thomas Aquinas mentioned and he also said that this person in ignorance would be saved because God would  send a preacher to him before he dies.

UNAM SANCTUM 

She then interprets Pope Boniface VIII' Unam Sanctum with this mistake.She writes ' the bull Unam sanctum (1302) declared that the only way to salvation was through being a subject of the Pope .' Correct. One had to be a formal member of the Church with 'faith and baptism'. Then comes her interpretation-' those who know that the Church is the true way to salvation, and still choose to deny and reject this, will not be granted salvation '. Pope Boniface does not say those who know but all need to enter the Church. This was also the position of St.Thomas Aquinas and St.Augustine.Those who know or do not know are known only to God. They are not known to us, for example, in 2014.So every one  in 2014 needs the baptism of water in the Catholic Church ( as the dogma teaches) and there are no known cases of someone who knew but did not enter and is damned. , or some one saved this year in invincible ignorance.
Annie Paish influenced by the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 assumes that those saved in invincible ignorance are known to us in the present times and so would be an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This would be the normal teaching at the Kings College, London.
Theology & Religious Studies graduate class
http://www.kcl.ac.uk/prospectus/graduate/index/name/theology-and-religious-studies/alpha/t/header_search/

Annie Paish continues to assume that those who are in invincible ignorance ( and not culpable) are persons whom we can know personally and so they are exceptions to the understanding of St.Augustine.

POPE PIUS XII
She writes Pope Pius IX  stated 'well known is the Catholic teaching that no one can be saved outside the Catholic Church” . So Pius XII supports the dogma and Fr.Leonard Feeney.But then she infers extra ecclesiam nulla salus applies 'only to those who are culpably outside of the Church' i.e those who know about the Church but do not enter.
She is not aware. She repeats the irrationality in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. (See the analyses of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 below)
Again she writes under the title Pope Pius XII and Mystici Corporis “to gain eternal salvation it is not always required that a person be incorporated in reality as a member of the Church, but it is required that he belong to it at least in desire and longing".She has picked up the text from the Letter of the Holy Office which denies the dogma as interpreted by the Church Councils.
The Letter of the Holy Office infers that the baptism of desire/implicit desire is known to us in personal cases. This is false . Since those who are saved with the baptism of desire are in Heaven. They cannot be  explicit exceptions, on earth, to all needing the baptism of water for salvation.

VATICAN COUNCIL II
She then comes to Vatican Council II with the same error.Lumen Gentium 8 refers to 'subsist it' and 'elements of sanctification and of truth [which] are found outside of its visible structure' neither of which are exceptions to all needing to enter the Catholic Church with faith and baptism for salvation.
LG 8 refers to theoretical,hypothetical cases which cannot be defacto exceptions to the dogma in the present times.Annie Parish cannot name any one this year who is an exception.

She says “since Christ died for all men, and since the ultimate vocation of man is in fact one, and divine, we ought to believe that the Holy Spirit in a manner known only to God offers to every man the possibility of being associated with this paschal mystery” (GS 22)  Yes in potential salvation is offered to all.However  one has to respond to receive it.Every one is not automatically saved. To be saved a person needs 'faith and baptism'(Ad Gentes 7) in the Catholic Church.Ad Gentes 7 supports the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Annie Paish has not mentioned AG 7.Not even once has she mentioned it!

ANONYMOUS CHRISTIAN
She refers to  Karl Rahner's Anonymous Christian and mentions  'the universality of God’s salvific will '. This is there in potential but according to Vatican Council II one needs faith and baptism for actual salvation.
Rahner ' holds that non-Christians who live good lives that compose (unknowingly to them) of God’s grace, may be called anonymous Christians '.This is  a possibility for Rahner. However we do not know any such case in 2014.So for someone to be saved as such we would have to know a particular case.This is not possible.Humans cannot see or know someone in Heaven this year saved as an Anonymous Christian and who did not need Catholic Faith and the Baptism of Desire..Rahner's Anonymous Christian is not an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Here is the mechanics of her error.

LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE 1949

In His infinite mercy God has willed that the effects, necessary for one to be saved, of those helps to salvation which are directed toward man's final end, not by intrinsic necessity, but only by divine institution, can also be obtained in certain circumstances when those helps are used only in desire and longing. This we see clearly stated in the Sacred Council of Trent, both in reference to the sacrament of regeneration and in reference to the sacrament of penance (, nn. 797, 807).

Lionel:
Correct. The Council of Trent mentions implicit desire and so do the popes and saints.
It must be noted though that the Council of Trent does not state that these cases are visible to us in the present times or that they are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.It does not state that we 'know' who are these persons.
Obviously, how can we know who has been saved as such, how can we seen them in Heaven for example in 2014?
Now, comes the false conclusion in this passage.
The same in its own degree must be asserted of the Church, in as far as she is the general help to salvation. Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member, but it is necessary that at least he be united to her by desire and longing.-Letter of the Holy Office 1949
 Lionel:
Since there are cases visible to them of persons saved with implicit desire, there is known salvation oustide the Church.This is the subtle false premise. So the conclusion is 'that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member'. The dogma says every one needs to enter the Church for salvation here it is denied.
The traditional teaching is that all the members of other religions and Christian communities need to formally enter the Church ( with faith and baptism).Here the Letter infers that there are known exceptions outside the Church.So the dogma has been rejected.
It is implied that those saved with implicit desire are known or knowable and those who are in invincible ignorance can also be saved and they are known to us.
The conclusion is that not every one needs to enter the Catholic Church for salvation as was traditionally taught but only those who 'know'.
False reasoning leads to a false conclusion. Here it is:-
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 says:
Therefore, no one will be saved who, knowing the Church to have been divinely established by Christ, nevertheless refuses to submit to the Church or withholds obedience from the Roman Pontiff, the Vicar of Christ on earth.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/10/false-conclusion-from-letter-of-holy.html

The Letter of the Holy Office is also analysed here 2.

The same wrong inference has been made  made by Prof. Gavin D'Costa , a professor of theology at the University of Bristol,England.
1.At both universities in England  they assume that the dead now saved in Heaven are visible and known on earth to be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
2.They have picked up this error from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which inferred that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are explicit exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma according to Fr.Leonard Feeney.
3.Kings College, London and the University of Bristol have a Department of Theology and Religious Studies, in which they reject the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with this irrationality of being able to see the dead now saved and who are allegedly examples of salvation outside the Church.
4.They mix up hypothetical cases as being defacto known in the present times and then allege that this is the official teaching of the Catholic Church after Vatican Council.-Lionel Andrades


1.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:86VwiL0-408J:www.kingscollege.net/gbrodie/Paish%2520%2520Dispelling%2520the%2520Myths%2520Behind.pptx+&cd=51&hl=it&ct=clnk&client=gmail

2.
LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE 1949
Therefore, no one will be saved who, knowing the Church to have been divinely established by Christ, nevertheless refuses to submit to the Church or withholds obedience from the Roman Pontiff, the Vicar of Christ on earth.-Letter of the Holy Office 1949
Lionel:
‘knowing the Church to have been divinely established by Christ’, those who ‘know’ or those who do not know and who are are saved with the baptism of desire are not known to us.Why mention this with reference to the dogma?.

In His infinite mercy God has willed that the effects, necessary for one to be saved, of those helps to salvation which are directed toward man’s final end, not by intrinsic necessity, but only by divine institution, can also be obtained in certain circumstances when those helps are used only in desire and longing. This we see clearly stated in the Sacred Council of Trent, both in reference to the sacrament of regeneration and in reference to the sacrament of penance (, nn. 797, 807).Lionel:
Why mention all this theology when you do not know a single such case in reality ? Did the Holy Office assume that these cases are visible and personally known exceptions?

The same in its own degree must be asserted of the Church, in as far as she is the general help to salvation. Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member, but it is necessary that at least he be united to her by desire and longing.-Letter of the Holy Office 1949Lionel:
‘Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member.Why? Do you know of some exception in the area where you live?

However, this desire need not always be explicit, as it is in catechumens; but when a person is involved in invincible ignorance God accepts also an implicit desire, so called because it is included in that good disposition of soul whereby a person wishes his will to be conformed to the will of God.-Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
Lionel:
So a person with implicit desire (which is not explicit and one who is ‘involved in invincible ignorance’ are visible ? And so they are explicit exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus ? And ‘ that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member’?

These things are clearly taught in that dogmatic letter which was issued by the Sovereign Pontiff, Pope Pius XII, on June 29, 1943, (AAS, Vol. 35, an. 1943, p. 193 ff.). For in this letter the Sovereign Pontiff clearly distinguishes between those who are actually incorporated into the Church as members, and those who are united to the Church only by desire.-Letter of the Holy Office 1949Lionel:
So the Letter is saying that Pope Pius XII assumed implicit for us cases are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and so ‘one may obtain eternal salvation’ under these conditions,and ‘ it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member’.Not always required that he be a member of the Church ?. Defacto, this would be heresy.

Discussing the members of which the Mystical Body is-composed here on earth, the same august Pontiff says: “Actually only those are to be included as members of the Church who have been baptized and profess the true faith, and who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or been excluded by legitimate authority for grave faults committed.”
Lionel:
This is the traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus. It is Feeneyism. It will soon be contradicted.

Toward the end of this same encyclical letter, when most affectionately inviting to unity those who do not belong to the body of the Catholic Church, he mentions those who “are related to the Mystical Body of the Redeemer by a certain unconscious yearning and desire,” and these he by no means excludes from eternal salvation, but on the other hand states that they are in a condition “in which they cannot be sure of their salvation” since “they still remain deprived of those many heavenly gifts and helps which can only be enjoyed in the Catholic Church” (AAS, 1. c., p. 243).-Letter of the Holy Office 1949
Lionel:
He is referring to a hypothetical case and assumes that it is relevant to the dogma.

With these wise words he reproves both those who exclude from eternal salvation all united to the Church only by implicit desire, and those who falsely assert that men can be saved equally well in every religion (cf. Pope Pius IX, Allocution, , in , n. 1641 ff.; also Pope Pius IX in the encyclical letter, , in , n. 1677).-Letter of the Holy Office 1949Lionel:
‘With these wise words he reproves both those who exclude from eternal salvation all united to the Church only by implicit desire’ .In other words ‘ all united to the Church only by implicit desire’ are physically visible to us and so are explicit exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Centers were wrong.

From what has been said it is evident that those things which are proposed in the periodical , fascicle 3, as the genuine teaching of the Catholic Church are far from being such and are very harmful both to those within the Church and those without.-Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
Lionel:
They (From the Housetops) did not consider implicit desire as explicit for us and so an exception to the traditional interpretation of the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.They were saying that all need to be formal members of the Catholic Church with no exception.

Furthermore, it is beyond understanding how a member of a religious Institute, namely Father Feeney, presents himself as a “Defender of the Faith,” and at the same time does not hesitate to attack the catechetical instruction proposed by lawful authorities,Lionel:
The lawful authorities in the Archdiocese of Boston were saying that there were known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

and has not even feared to incur grave sanctions threatened by the sacred canons because of his serious violations of his duties as a religious, a priest, and an ordinary member of the Church.-Letter of the Holy Office 1949
Lionel:
Fr.Leonard Feeney would be excommunicated in a few years after this, for holding the traditional interpretation of the dogma and the Archbishop would not deny reports in the secular media saying that the Church has changed its teaching on outside the Church there is no salvation. The Holy Office never objected.

Finally, it is in no wise to be tolerated that certain Catholics shall claim for themselves the right to publish a periodical, for the purpose of spreading theological doctrines, without the permission of competent Church authority, called the “” which is prescribed by the sacred canons.-Letter of the Holy Office 1949
Lionel:
For Cardinal Cushing to say that there are known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus is heresy. It is also irrational.He was to give the imprimatur ?!

Therefore, let them who in grave peril are ranged against the Church seriously bear in mind that after “Rome has spoken” they cannot be excused even by reasons of good faith. Certainly, their bond and duty of obedience toward the Church is much graver than that of those who as yet are related to the Church “only by an unconscious desire.” Let them realize that they are children of the Church, lovingly nourished by her with the milk of doctrine and the sacraments, and hence, having heard the clear voice of their Mother, they cannot be excused from culpable ignorance, and therefore to them apply without any restriction that principle: submission to the Catholic Church and to the Sovereign Pontiff is required as necessary for salvation.-Letter of the Holy Office 1949Lionel:
‘submission to the Catholic Church and to the Sovereign Pontiff is required as necessary for salvation’, when an irrationality is being taught.

http://www.harvestingthefruit.com/this-just-in/#comments
________________________________________________

Synod of the Sacrilege?

 
 
 

Maria Simma could see souls in Purgatory and also speak to them.This was her charism.A priest who was in Purgatory appeared to her.He told her that he suffered for making Catholics receive the Eucharist in their hand.He thought Vatican Council II had introduced this manner of receiving the Eucharist. Maria Simma said Vatican Council did not ask that the Eucharist at Mass should be received in the hand.Neither did Vatican Council II recommend receiving the Eucharist standing. She said this was done by Freemason cardinals.
Maria Simma says those who can receive the Eucharist kneeling should do so. Also we should not receive the Eucharist in the palm of the hand.
At today's Synod, Ecclesiastical Masonry will welcome  those persons living in adultery and mortal sin to be given the Eucharist sacrilegously.
 
Pope Francis greets a cardinal as he leaves at the end of a mass to mark the opening of the Synod on the Family in St Peter’s Square at the Vatican today. Photograph: Tony Gentile/Reuters.
 
This will bring more pain for Jesus who feels and suffers like a human being in the Eucharist.This will please Satan who hates Our Lord.
Ecclesiastical Masonry in little ways targets the Eucharist. Have you noticed that at the Novus Ordo Mass, at the time of the Consecration, people are asked to stand and not kneel. This is a little way that Ecclesiastical Masonry taunts and hurts Jesus.
Think of all the cardinals, bishops, priests... who have to give the Eucharist to people in manifest mortal sin.They are cooperating in the sacrilege.Is it a mortal sin for them?
Pope Francis who does not genuflect at the Consecration is ready to give the Eucharist to persons in mortal sin.
When the new Archbishop of Chicago for example is comfortable with giving the Eucharist to those who support abortion or are in a homosexual relationship, one can ask what does he believe in?
When Cardinal Wuerl, Sean o Malley, Dolan and others have values that are pro Satan (giving the Eucharist to Catholic politicians in manifest mortal sin)  one could ask what do they really believe in? Are they part of ecclesiastical Masonry or just following instructions from the pope or someone else?
 We can judge some people by 'the fruits'. If they are willing to go so far, then how far is far enough ? When they worship, is, it God whom they worship?
We can never really know. We can just be positive and judge them positively and hope for the best.-Lionel Andrades
 
 

Priest in Purgatory appears to Maria Simma: RECEIVE THE EUCHARIST KNEELING AND ON THE TONGUE ONLY

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/02/priest-in-purgatory-appears-to-maria.html#links
 

 
 
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/10/more-and-more-is-maria-divine-mercy.html#links

Extra ecclesiam nulla salus defined three times is denied by Pope Francis, the Vatican Curia and Jesuits among others.This is first class heresy and a mortal sin

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/10/extra-ecclesiam-nulla-salus-defined.html

False conclusion from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 incorporated in Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church now used by Cardinal Kaspar at the Synod of the Family