Monday, February 13, 2023
When the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith punishes Catholics for affirming the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, it is not Magisterial but political.
When the Congregation for the Doctrine
of the Faith punishes Catholics for affirming the traditional strict
interpretation of the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus, it is not Magisterial but political. It is supporting
heresy and schism for political-left reasons. It is pleasing the Jewish Left
rabbis and not Jesus Christ. The CDF is placing the cabbalist and Talmudic and
rejecting the popes and saints of the past.- Lionel Andrades
, FEBRUARY 13, 2023
The Vatican is interpreting Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise to produce a Fake Conclusion. They now control all the property of the religious communities, who are to do the same.
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
Bishop Athanasius Schneider avoids being cancelled
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
The norm for salvation is Catholic faith and the baptism of water (AG 7, LG 14) and we do not know of any objective cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church. This is the teaching of the Catholic Church today. This was not the teaching of Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr. John Hardon, Fr. William Most and Ludwig Ott who interpreted Magisterial Documents with the False Premise.
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
If Bishop Athanasius Schneider uses the Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II he would be saying there are no exceptions in the Council-text for Feeneyite EENS
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
French bishops and Religious Superiors Oath of Office and Renewal of Vows and Profession of Faith are presently false.
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
The Ecclesia Dei communities in France must ask Bishop Dominique Rey, Archbishop Antoine Herouard and Bishop Joel Mercier to uphold the teachings of Vatican Council II, interpreted only rationally. : Investigation begins today : Dom Alcuin Reid cannont be considered schismatic because he does not accept the Council irrationally
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
The Dean of Theology at St. Anselm, Rome avoids being expelled.
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
The SSPX bishops and Superior General, in conscience, must oppose the expected ban on the Latin Mass before the Easter Triduum, since Vatican Council II interpreted rationally only supports the past ecclesiology of the Roman Missal and not the liberalism of the popes.
FEBRUARY 12, 2023
The Vatican and the Left will excommunicate/laicize/suspend any priest who affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So they do not allow Vatican Council II to be interpreted rationally. They want the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus to be rejected even though it is Biblical.
FEBRUARY 12, 2023
When the Council is interpreted rationally it supports Tradition. It is in harmony with the past ecclesiocentricism of the Catholic Church. It supports the ecclesiology of only the old Roman Missal. It is in harmony with the past Magisterium
FEBRUARY 12, 2023
Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus and the other encyclicals and Apostolic Letters of the popes from Paul VI to Francis were issued with the irrational and not rational interpretation of Vatican Council II
FEBRUARY 11, 2023
At the ongoing Holy Communion and Confirmation preparation classes in the parish San Giuseppe all’ Aurelio, Rome, near the Cornelia Metro Station, the children are not being taught to interpret Vatican Council II rationally, and so affirm that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation (CCC 845,846).
FEBRUARY 10, 2023
Rorate Caeili (web blog) is still misleading Catholics.
FEBRUARY 10, 2023
This distinction between radical-traditionalist Catholic and the rank and file Catholic in the main line Church, with Mass in the vernacular, has ended.
FEBRUARY 10, 2023
The sedevacantists are correct about Vatican Council II. The Council was interpreted irrationally and not rationally. A false premise and inference was chosen instead of the rational option : Vatican Council II interpreted with a Fake Premise is unethical and political and Michael Voris has to choose it
FEBRUARY 10, 2023
Minim priests and religious sisters at the basilica of San Andrea delle Fratte Rome agree with me
FEBRUARY 9, 2023
The Ecclesia Dei communities which met at Courtlain, France are still not telling Pope Francis that if he interprets LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II rationally, then he would be a traditionalist like them. He would have returned to Catholic Tradition overnight.
FEBRUARY 9, 2023
No Statement from SSPX Albano.
FEBRUARY 9, 2023
There is no denial from Michael Voris. His interpretation of Vatican Council II (irrational) is political
FEBRUARY 9, 2023
FSSP church in Rome
FEBRUARY 9, 2023
So the SSPX priest to protect himself and the SSPX he will tell the congregation a lie about Vatican Council II. He will call this being prudent.
The Vatican is interpreting Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise to produce a Fake Conclusion. They now control all the property of the religious communities, who are to do the same.
The Vatican is interpreting Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise to produce a Fake Conclusion. They now control all the property of the religious communities, who are to do the same.
Pope Francis is interpreting Vatican Council II with a False Premise and Inference.Al religious communities who want to stay in their community, would have to do the same. -Lionel AndradesBishop Athanasius Schneider avoids being cancelled
It is about
two years since Bishop Athanasius Schneider said that there are no literal
cases of the baptism of desire. He was interviewed by Dr. Taylor Marshal.
Marshall. Marshall confirmed that there are no explicit cases of St. Thomas Aquinas’ implicit
desire.
They both
were saying that Lumen Gentium 14 ( baptism of desire) refers to only
hypothetical cases. There are no objective cases.
They
indicated that LG 8, 14 and 16 were not objective examples of salvation outside
the Church. There are no literal cases.
So they indicated
that LG 8, 14 and 16, .UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 are not practical exceptions for the
Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. The Council is not a break with
Tradition.
Yet Bishop
Schneider did not say this in his interview with Eric Sammons for Crisis
magazine. Also in the interview with Steve Bannon he continued to interpret
Vatican Council II with LG 8, 14 and 16 etc being visible exceptions for the
dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So the Council was still a break with
Tradition for him.
He avoided
being suspended.- Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 12, 2023
The Vatican and the Left will excommunicate/laicize/suspend any priest who affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So they do not allow Vatican Council II to be interpreted rationally. They want the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus to be rejected even though it is Biblical.
The norm for salvation is Catholic faith and the baptism of water (AG 7, LG 14) and we do not know of any objective cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church. This is the teaching of the Catholic Church today. This was not the teaching of Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr. John Hardon, Fr. William Most and Ludwig Ott who interpreted Magisterial Documents with the False Premise.
MAY 12, 2022
The norm for salvation is Catholic faith and the baptism of water (AG 7, LG 14) and we do not know of any objective cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church. This is the teaching of the Catholic Church today. This was not the teaching of Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr. John Hardon, Fr. William Most and Ludwig Ott who interpreted Magisterial Documents with the False Premise.
When I meet a non Catholic I know he is oriented to Hell since the Catholic Church teaches this in Vatican Council II (Rational). The norm for salvation is Catholic faith and the baptism of water (AG 7, LG 14) and we do not know of any objective cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to only hypothetical cases, invisible people in 2022. So there are no practical exceptions, mentioned in Vatican Council II, for the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed and the rest of Tradition.
This is the Magisterial teaching of the Catholic Church in harmony with the past Magisterium which was inspired by the Holy Spirit. This is continuity with the de fide teachings of the past in harmony with Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents interpreted with the Rational Premise.
This was not the teaching of Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr. John Hardon, Fr. William Most and Ludwig Ott who interpreted Magisterial Documents with the False Premise.
This is not the teaching of the present popes, cardinals and bishops who use the same False Premise and then project Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors. The blame the Council and not their False Premise, of which they are unaware.
There are not literal cases of the baptism of desire said Bishop Athanasius Schneider, while using the Rational Premise. There are no explicit cases of St. Thomas Aquinas’ implicit baptism of desire, said Dr. Taylor Marshall, while also using the Rational Premise.
The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are zero cases in our reality said the apologist John Martignoni, while also choosing the Rational Premise.Many priests in Rome have said that the baptism of desire was not an exception for Feeneyite EENS.
So we are back to the traditional exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, with Mission based upon exclusive salvation. There is no New Ecumenism when Unitatis Redintigratio, the Decree on Ecumenism,in Vatican Council II, is interpreted with the Rational Premise.
So we proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the
King in all politics, since there are no exceptions for the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church on salvation, which is supported by Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.-Lionel Andrades
If Bishop Athanasius Schneider uses the Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II he would be saying there are no exceptions in the Council-text for Feeneyite EENS
MARCH 4, 2022
If Bishop Athanasius Schneider uses the Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II he would be saying there are no exceptions in the Council-text for Feeneyite EENS
DECEMBER 20, 2021
Bishop Athanasius Schneider said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire. This makes the New Theology obsolete. It confused what is invisble as being visible
NOVEMBER 30, 2021
Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria choose the New Theology. Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall choose the Old Theology
OCTOBER 4, 2021
Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr.Taylor Marshall have found the Specific Error in Vatican Council II. It is the Fake Premise. They have used the Rational Premise. This was not known to Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops.
Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr.Taylor Marshall have found the Specific Error in Vatican Council II. It is the Fake Premise. They have used the Rational Premise. This was not known to Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops.
When interviewed recently by Dr. Taylor Marshall, Bishop Athanasius Schneider said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire.This is something obvious but still unknown among sections of the SSPX and the Church at large.It is at the centre of the New Theology and the interpretation of Vatican Council II.Dr. Taylor Marshall agreed. He said that there are no explicit cases of St. Thomas Aquinas’ implicit baptism of desire. He avoided the False Premise and the New Theology which attaches itself to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and Vatican Council II when the False Premise is used.
This was not known to Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre who blamed the Council.Since the Council Fathers had used the False Premise of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) and Pope Paul VI did not correct them.There are no baptism of desire cases.This is a fact of life.This was not stated by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith or the popes who followed Paul VI.
Now in Traditionis Custode Pope Francis used the False Premise and not Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and the SSPX Superior General Fr. Davide Pagliarani did not correct the mistake.Since he also interprets the Council like the popes and Archbishop Lefebvre. So as expected there was no comment also from Una Voce International,FSSP,Latin Mass Societies, Coetus International, Novus Ordo Watch,CMRI, Most Holy Family Monastery,Most Holy Trinity seminary of Bishop Donald Sanborn. They have not discovered the Specific Error in the Council-text and so put the blame on the Council in general.
All these years they have criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney and remained politically correct with the Left and the liberals, who also use the same False Premise.
There are no physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church. This is a fact of life.So now there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II. It is with the Fake Premise or with the Rational Premise. This is a fact we have to acknowledge.-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 29, 2021
Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall say there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire but the German Synodal path is based upon there being literal cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14) in the present times
Bishop Athanasius Schneider in an interview with Dr. Taylor Marshall has said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire in the present times(2021). So LG 14 ( Case of the Catechumen) would be a hypothetical and speculative case only. But for Cardinal Marx this is not his interpretation of Vatican Council II upon which is based the German Synodal Way.For him LG 14 and also LG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22, LG 16,LG 8 would refer to literal cases of non Catholics in the present times (1965-2021) saved without ‘faith and baptism’(AG 7), outside the Church. It is only in this way that he can avoid affirming Catholic Tradition (EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).
If the Germans interpreted LG 14 like Bishop Athanasius Schneider there would be no theological bases for the German Synodal Breakaway.
In France, Bishop Roland Mitterand in Dijon, wrote his books on the Concordats and the theology of religious pluralism by interpreting LG 14 irrationally.The French Bishops’ Conference must be asked to clarify that the baptism of desire is always hypothetical, theoretical and invisible for us human beings.In principle, hypothetical cases of LG 14, LG 16 etc cannot be practical exceptions in 2021 to Tradition ( Catechism of Pope Pius X, Council of Trent etc).
Like the French, Cardinal Peter Erdo in Hungary and the Hungarian Bishops’ Conference, could also be confusing the “implicit baptism of desire” of St. Thomas Aquinas as being explicit in the present times.
In Poland, the National Catechetical Center is in schism with the past Magisterium, since with visible cases of the baptism of desire, a hermeneutic of rupture is created with the Athanasius Creed, the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q,27Q).They need to issue a statement on this issue.
Their Episcopal Conference, like those all over the world, interpret the baptism of desire with a fake and not rational premise . So there is a fake break with Catholic Tradition.
The Schneider-Marshall video is really asking the U.S bishops to be ethical and honest.They are saying that the cardinals and bishops in Britain are also dishonest, when they project the baptism of desire as an exception to EENS according to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
The bishops in Switzerland had also been asking the Society of St. Pius X to interpret the baptism of desire with the irrationality mentioned by Bishop Schneider, and then to accept the non traditional conclusion.This is not Catholic.
Pope Benedict did not grant canonical recognition to the SSPX and said it was a doctrinal issue.Bishop Charles Morerod in Switzerland would not allow the SSPX to use the churches there, and said it was a doctrinal issue. They had to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and accept the non traditional conclusion, like the liberals.
Pope Benedict needs to be honest.He needs to apologize to the SSPX.-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 30, 2021
Don Pietro Leone and Rorate Caeili interpret Vatican Council II like Fr. John Courtney Murray sj : Lumen Gentium 14 ( Baptism of desire) is an exception to Tradition for them
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/don-pietro-leone-and-rorate-caeili.html
AUGUST 29, 2021
Bishop Kevin Rhoades, the Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinnal Committee, interprets Lumen Gentium 14 ( baptism of desire) with a false premise. Bishop Athanasius Schnedier and Dr. Taylor Marshall avoid it
NOVEMBER 9, 2020
Bishop Kevin Rhoades, the Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee, interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise. His error is there on line as proof.No one questions him about it
Bishop Kevin Rhoades, the Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee, interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise. His error is there on line as proof.No one questions him about it. -Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 28, 2021
So we proclaim the Faith and return to traditional mission as at the time of St. Ignatius of Loyola, St. Robert Bellarmine and St. Francis Xavier
So we proclaim the Faith and return to traditional mission as at the time of St. Ignatius of Loyola, St. Robert Bellarmine and St. Francis Xavier. All non Catholics are oriented to Hell according to Bishop Athanasius Schneider and not only those ‘who know’ about Jesus and the Church(LG 14) – since invincible ignorance is no more a practical exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).All in general need faith and baptism for salvation(AG 7) and if there are any exceptions of those 'who know' or 'do not know' it could only be known to God.So there are no known practical exceptions for the Great Commission.
The Council Fathers (1965) made an objective error when they projected the baptism of desire(LG 14) as an exception to EENS according to Loyola, Bellarmine and Xavier.This mistake was there in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston(LOHO).Pope Benedict needs to issue a correction and apologise. Since his New Theology is based upon the false premise of the LOHO.
The false premise of Pope Benedict is now a theological virus that has spread in the Catholic Church, like an epidemic. He has to end it.He must correct Pope Francis’ mistake, which is also that of the College of Cardinals.
Pope Benedict needs to tell Pope Francis that all the books on Vatican Council II have got the ‘virus’ and so are useless.They were made irrelevant with the error. Also Pope Benedict’s books on Ecclesiology published by Ignatius Press, and in the many German editions, have to be phased out. The pontifical universities must note the error in the books on Ecclesiology, written also by Semeraro, Kasper and Forte.
Pope Benedict wanted the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) to keep interpreting the baptism of desire(LG 14) as referring to to literal cases, presently known to us. So they would have to interpret Vatican Council II (LG 14 etc) in principle, by confusing invisible cases as being physically visible. Then with this irrationality they would have to accept the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition, which would follow with the use of the false premise. It was only with this doctrinal and theological error, was he prepared to grant the SSPX canonical recognition.Pope Francis needs to apologise.
Pope Benedict wanted the SSPX to interpret Vatican Council II with LG 14 being a literal example of salvation outside the Church in the present times and Bishop Schneider and Dr.Taylor Marshall are saying there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire in 1965-2021.
Bishop Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall are avoiding the fake premise ( invisible people are visible in the present times) and Pope Benedict and Pope Francis have to use it to create a break with Tradition (EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).
If the popes choose the rational premise ( invisible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church in 2021 are invisible) then they would be saying that in Vatican Council II, LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc do not contradict the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church, opposed by the Left.-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 28, 2021
Bishop Athanasius Schneider has said that there are no known literal cases of the baptism of desire in our human reality but Cardinal Ratzinger wrote Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus with there being literally known cases of being saved with the baptism of desire
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-has-said_28.html
AUGUST 27, 2021
Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall are telling Pope Francis that all the books on Vatican Council II are written with a false premise and in general they are obsolete
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-and-dr.html
Posts
