Monday, January 2, 2023

Peter and Michael Dimond are still interpreting Vatican Council II irrrationally



Fr.Frank Pavone is in the main line Catholic Church which Brother Peter Dimond criticizes.With the Rational Premise there is no reason for the Most Holy Family Monastery  to reject Vatican Council II.
There is no reason for sedevacantism any more based upon Vatican COuncil II( irrational). Since with the Rational Premise Vatican Council II is in harmony with Tradition. So it is important that Peter and Michael Dimond correct their mistake. The Council supports Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
I have mentioned this many times but there is no response from Peter and Michael Dimond. Their ' traditional Catholic faith' is based upon the irrational interpretation of Magisterial Documents. -Lionel Andrades

Vatican Council II cannot be used any more to justify a break with traditional teachings on homosexuality,abortion, adultery, fornication, no salvation outside the Church,polygamy etc. So the cardinals must oppose the appointment of Bishop Heiner Wilmer scj, as the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.

 


Vatican Council II is traditionalist, exclusivist and not conservative when it is interpreted rationally with the Rational Premise. So Vatican Council II cannot be used any more to justify a break with traditional teachings on homosexuality,abortion, adultery, fornication, no salvation outside the Church,polygamy etc. So the cardinals must oppose the appointment of Bishop Heiner Wilmer scj, as the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. He must affirm the Catholic faith in public. He could answer the points mentioned in these blog posts.

Both Cardinal Marx and Sister Nathalie Bequart have said that the Synods are based upon the new ecclesiology of Vatican Council II. They refer to the Council interpreted irrationally. So the cardinal must also correct this statement. The cardinals musts also inform Pope Francis that the Abu Dhabi Declaration can no more be justified in the name of Vatican Council II. The Council has to be only interpreted rationally. This is the only moral choice. They must also ask Al Azhar University to interpret Vatican Council II rationally only. This is the moral thing to do.

A bishop in public mortal sin is a scandal.He must acknowledge his sins in public and go for Confession.

The Council interpreted rationally supports the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors which the German bishop does not approve.

According to Vatican Council, the other Abrahimic religions are not paths to salvation. Ad Gentes 7 says all need Catholic faith and the baptism of water for salvation. All.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church says outside the Church there is no salvation (846), God the Father wants all to be united in the Catholic Church (845) and the Catholic Church is like the Ark of Noah that saves in the flood (CCC 845). Cardinal Ratzinger in the CDF Notification against the Jesuit priest Jacques Dupuis said other religions are not paths to salvation and their members are oriented to the Catholic Church.

These are de fide teachings of the Church.these are values which are not held by Bishop Hilmer. Canonically it is important for a bishop and priest to have the Catholic faith. This means interpreting the Nicene Creed rationally and traditionally and accepting the Athanasius Creed etc. He does not do this.

Here is the rational approach to Vatican Council II.

LG 8, 14, 16, NA 2, GS 22 refer to only speculative cases. They exist only in our mind. They are not known people in the present times, saved outside the Church. So they are not practical exceptions for the dogma EENS. They do not contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.

So Mystici Corporis, Quanta Cura, Quanto Conficemur Moerore, Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus and other Church Documents, which mention the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance, do not contradict Ad Gentes 7 (all need faith and baptism for salvation).BOD, BOB and I.I do not contradict the Athanasius Creed (all need Catholic faith for salvation).They do not contradict the Syllabus of Errors (ecumenism of return/no salvation outside the Church).

It may be mentioned that Fr. Luiz Ladaria sj and Fr. Charles Morerod op, as officials of the International Theological Commission, made an error in two theological papers. They projected the BOD, BOB and I.I as being practical exceptions for traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus. They made a mistake and must acknowledge it.

How can invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I be visible exceptions for St. Thomas Aquinas’ interpretation of the dogma EENS ? -Lionel Andrades



JANUARY 1, 2023




Bishop Heiner Wilmer scj, bishop of Hildeshieim, Germany is not eligible to be the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican until he affirms Vatican Council II in public. Catholics now know that they can interpret the Council rationally. So they are not obliged to interpret the Council like Pope Francis and the German bishops.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/01/bishop-heiner-wilmer-scj-bishop-of.html


DECEMBER 31, 2022

So why should we accept the new German Prefect of the CDF? He is in public heresy. Vatican Council II is not a break with Tradition. He needs to end the scandal before offering Holy Mass in the vernacular. There is an impediment.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/12/so-why-should-we-accept-new-german.html

Untold Stories of Medjugorje

Testimony by Fr. Francis Xavier from India about the Marian Apparitions ...

Rosary Prayer before Public Apparition of Our Lady with Visionary Maria in Medjugorje | Jan 01, 2023

Public Apparition of Our Lady with Visionary Maria in Medjugorje | January 01, 2023