Friday, May 11, 2018

Water Fast for God. (120 days)

Parts of Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus of Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger cannot be magisterial since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake : the false theology is also there in the new book Liberating Freedom: Faith and Politics in the Third Millennium / Joseph Ratzinger-Benedict XVI, “Liberare la libertà. Fede e politica nel terzo millennio” ( Cantagalli)

Presentazione del volume: "Liberare la libertà. Fede e politica nel terzo millennio"
Parts of Redemptoris Missio(RM) of Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger cannot be magisterial since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake.The theology of RM is based on a false premise, a misunderstanding, which was also overlooked at Vatican Council II and the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO).The same bad theology will be expressed in the new book of Pope Benedict to be launched today in Rome.

FALSE THEOLOGY PLACES LIMITATIONS ON REDEMPTORIS MISSIO AND DOMINUS IESUS
It is because of the false theology of Vatican Council II, which was not corrected, by Cardinal Ratzinger as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), that Redemptorist Missio and also Dominus Iesus(DI) do not outright say that all need to be formal members of the Catholic Church for salvation and there can be no known exceptions for us humans.
But since there could be known salvation outside the Church for the Council Fathers(1965) and Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits(1949), which was a mistake they made,   RM and DI indicate there are known to us, non Catholics, saved outside the Catholic Church.So the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are mentioned as if they are relevant or are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).

REDEMPTORIS MISSIO AND DOMINUS IESUS INDICATE THERE ARE KNOWN CATHOLICS SAVED OUTSIDE THE  CHURCH
In other words RM and DI are saying that there are known non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church.This is a factual error.
If someone is saved with the BOD, BOB or in I.I , with or without the baptism of water,it would only be known to God and they would be in Heaven.
They are invisible people on earth. So how can they be relevant or exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus? They are not.

FALSE THEOLOGY ALSO IN CATECHISM, BALAMAND DECLARATION,ITC PAPERS
Yet upon this false theology Cardinal Ratzinger put together RM and DI  and has also expressed the error in other documents of the Church, which cannot be magisterial e.g Balamand Declaration, Christianity and the World Religions, ITC(1997) and 'The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized '(ITC). 1

58. In the face of new problems and situations and of an exclusive interpretation of the adage: (it was a dogma and not an adage)salus extra ecclesiam non est”, (it was always extra ecclesiam nulla salus) the magisterium, in recent times, has articulated a more nuanced understanding as to the manner in which a saving relationship with the Church can be realized.(nuanced version is not exclusivist) The Allocution of Pope Pius IX, Singulari Quadam (1854) clearly states the issues involved: “It must, of course, be held as a matter of faith that outside the apostolic Roman Church no one can be saved, that the Church is the only ark of salvation, and that whoever does not enter it, will perish in the flood. On the other hand, it must likewise be held as certain that those who live in ignorance of the true religion, if such ignorance be invincible, are not subject to any guilt in this matter before the eyes of the Lord” (In other words they are exceptions to EENS  for the ITC and so there is no more an exclusive interpretation)
THE HOPE OF SALVATION FOR INFANTS  WHO DIE WITHOUT BEING BAPTISED http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20070419_un-baptised-infants_en.html

This was also the Vatican's false theology in the doctrinal talks with the SSPX led by Fr.Charles Morerod op(for Pope Benedict) and Fr. Jean Marie Gleize(for the SSPX).They both were using the same irrational theology.

VATICAN COUNCIL II IS READ WITH A FALSE PREMISE
Since RM and DI do not affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS, the Church no more says all those who are outside the Church are on the way to Hell but only those who know and who are not in invincible ignorance. Since there is allegedly known salvation outside the Church.So only those who 'know' and do not enter are on the way to Hell (LG 14).So this a new doctrine.It rejects the dogma EENS.Yet it is often said that Vatican Council II has not taught any new doctrine.This is false.Since with the false premise Vatican Council II can be read as changing theology and doctrine.

WITHOUT THE FALSE PREMISE VATICAN COUNCIL II  DOES NO CONTRADICT EENS
But without the false premise when Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally, it does not contradict EENS e.g Lumen Gentium 14 would refer  to invisible cases in 2018.

Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved.-Lumen Gentium 14,Vatican Council II.

Catechumens who, moved by the Holy Spirit, seek with explicit intention to be incorporated into the Church are by that very intention joined with her. With love and solicitude Mother Church already embraces them as her own.-Lumen Gentium 14,Vatican Council II

The reference above in the two quotations from Lumen Gentium 14 are to unknown non Catholics.It can only be a reference to hypothetical cases.So Lumen Gentium 14 does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvation.Neither does it not contradict the dogma EENS which tells us all non Catholics are on the way to Hell, unless they convert into the Catholic Church as members( Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441).So Lumen Gentium 14 does not contradict for me, the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.

CARDINAL RATZINGER WRONGLY ASSUMED INVISIBLE NON CATHOLICS WERE VISIBLE
But this was not Cardinal Ratzinger's approach when he wrote/approved Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus  and the Catechism(1994).He wrongly assumed invisible non Catholics were visible. Then he built  his theology from this error.
He assumed unknown non Catholics saved in I.I were known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.Then he supported a new theology  which says outside the Church there is known salvation.

THERE CANNOT BE PHYSICALLY VISIBLE CATHOLICS SAVED OUTSIDE THE CHURCH
This is false. He made a big mistake.Outside the Church there cannot be known Catholics saved for human beings.
This is a major error in the Catholic Church which was there in a big way in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, which definitely was not magisterial, because of the mistake in philosophy and theology within it.

HERETICAL THEOLOGY CREATES A SCHISM WITH THE PAST POPES AND DOCTRINAL CONFUSION
So in the new theology approved by the Left  there is no more EENS and  the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation, since allegedly there is known salvation outside the Church.There is no need for Mission as Pope Benedict indicated in March 2016(Avvenire).So the new book being launched today, before the Leftist Senate in Rome, denies the traditional teachings of the Catholic faith.It has a heretical theology which creates a schism with the past popes on EENS etc.It is politically motivated.
But it is nothing new.It was all there in Redemptoris Missio and other 'magisterial documents' of Cardinal Ratzinger/Pope Benedict.-Lionel Andrades






1.

JUNE 26, 2012


ITC documents 'Christianity and the World Religions' and 'The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized ' need to be retracted or corrected: Richard Cushing flaw runs through
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/06/itc-documents-christianity-and-world.html

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Bishop Charles Morerod O.P Oath of Fidelity: to dissent Profession of Faith allows for dissent on ecclesiology and baptism


INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION USES PREMISE THAT IS FACTUALLY INCORRECT : LIMBO

The International Theological Commission's position paper Christianity and the World Religions 1997 has an objective factual error and is approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger : invincible ignorance is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION ASSUMES ‘SEEDS OF THE WORD’ (VATICAN COUNCIL II ) IN OTHER RELIGIONS ARE KNOWN TO US AND THIS IS AN EXPLICIT EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS



VATICAN'S INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION MAKES AN ERROR IN ITS POSITION PAPER CHRISTIANITY AND THE WORLD RELIGIONS


VATICAN COUNCIL II REJECTS THE THEOLOGY OF RELIGIONS


Former Secretary of the International Theological Commission holds that those saved with the baptism of desire and in invincible ignorance are known to us and so an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus


SSPX WEBSITE: ' I believe in three baptisms for the forgiveness of sins’ ?


WILL BISHOP BERNARD FELLAY IN THE PROFESSION OF FAITH SAY: 'I BELIEVE IN ONE BAPTISM FOR THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS?


Bishop Fellay, Fr.Schmidberger,FSSP,Joseph Fenton seem unaware the baptism of desire is not an explicit exception to the dogma

Monday, June 25, 2012
CARDINAL LEVADA WRITES PREFACE FOR ITC BOOK : IT SAYS THE HOLY OFFICE CORRECTED FR.LEONARD FEENEY FOR DENYING THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE, WHICH IT IS ASSUMED (WRONGLY) CONTRADICTS THE DOGMA
In what way does the baptism of desire contradict the literal interpretation of the dogma, CDF?

MAY 10, 2018

Matteo Salvini, leader of Eurosceptic party League and Silvio Berlusconi, leader of the Forza Italia party: “We will evaluate the government that is created, supporting any measures that are useful for Italians,” tweeted Mr Berlusconi. Photograph: Giulio Napolitano/Bloomberg

Pope Benedict's book which does not support the non separation of Church and State and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation has theology based upon a lie http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/pope-benedicts-book-which-does-not.html



MAY 10, 2018

Image result for Photo of Italian senate

Joseph Ratzinger’s "Liberating freedom. Faith and politics in the third millennium" published by Cantagalli, will be launched at the Italian Senate tomorrow : more theology for the Left from Pope Emeritus http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/oseph-ratzingers-liberating-freedom.html

MAY 10, 2018




Archbishop Lefebvre was misled and now Pope Benedict continues to produce theology for the Left : Liberating Freedom: Faith and Politics in the Third Millennium / Joseph Ratzinger-Benedict XVI, “Liberare la libertà. Fede e politica nel terzo millennio” ( Cantagalli) http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/archbishop-lefebvre-was-misled-and-now.html



 MAY 9, 2018




Pope Benedict produces theology for the Left : new book Liberating Freedom: Faith and Politics in the Third Millennium / Joseph Ratzinger-Benedict XVI, “Liberare la libertà. Fede e politica nel terzo millennio” ( Cantagalli)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/pope-benedict-continues-to-produce.html


NOVEMBER 26, 2017



The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/the-social-reign-of-christ-king-can-be.html

Repost :Pope Benedict produces theology for the Left : new book Liberating Freedom: Faith and Politics in the Third Millennium / Joseph Ratzinger-Benedict XVI, “Liberare la libertà. Fede e politica nel terzo millennio” ( Cantagalli)

MAY 9, 2018

Pope Benedict produces theology for the Left : new book Liberating Freedom: Faith and Politics in the Third Millennium / Joseph Ratzinger-Benedict XVI, “Liberare la libertà. Fede e politica nel terzo millennio” ( Cantagalli)

Pope Benedict continues to write theology  for the Left. He proclaims the necessity of believing in God without the necessity of being a member of the Catholic Church.His new book to be released in Italy tomorrow would be useful for the Jewish Left, the Anti-Christ and a future one world religion.Pope Francis wrote the preface.
In his new book  Liberating Freedom: Faith and Politics in the Third Millennium he has not criticized the present human rights' priority being in Satan with abortion, homosexuality etc. Now he presents the Logos for all.This is a development. In the past it would be a vague Christology without the exclusivist ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church's traditional theology.So a false base was created for a new ecumenism. Would human rights being centered on God, without membership in the Catholic Church, be an outreach for unity with non Christians too?
NEW ECUMENISM SUPPORTED IN 2016
In March 2016(Avvenire) he did not choose to affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.While at his lecture on faith and reason at Ratisbonne he did not cite Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II, which says all need faith and baptism  for salvation. Vatican Council II would be saying that  Muslims and other non Christians would need to convert into the Church for salvation.
Pope Benedict continues to support a new theology for the globalists.

LOHO CANNOT BE INSPIRED BY THE HOLY SPIRIT
As Cardinal Ratzinger he cited the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994).The LOHO is not a magisterial document since the Holy Spirit cannot make a mistake.Yet he referenced in the Catechism(1994) and the theological papers of the International Theological Commision. LOHO assumes unknown cases of the baptism of desire, invincible ignorance etc are known exceptions to EENS.It is a fact of life that we cannot see or meet BOD cases in real life.So they cannot be exceptions.

NEW THEOLOGY OF POPE BENEDICT BASED ON LOHO
For LOHO invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.This is an objective mistake and cannot be inspired by the Holy Spirit.
Yet the liberal theologian Joseph Ratzinger based his new theology on LOHO . This was a mistake.

OBSOLETE EENS USEFUL FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
His friend Fr.Karl Rahner s.j placed LOHO in the Denzinger.For him too the dogma EENS was obsolete.The way was open for salvation outside the Church and the new  ecumenism. It rejected the Social Reign of Christ the King and the non separation of Church and State, since there was alleged salvation outside the Church for the liberals.This is a theme continued in the new book
Benedetto

The influence of Marcello Pera is there.The pope-emeritus' friend wrote Human Rights and Christianity.
'The book undoubtedly represents a great challenge for contemporary thought, and also, in particular, for the Church and theology. The discontinuity between the statements of the popes of the nineteenth century and the new vision that begins with “Pacem in Terris” is evident and on it there has been much discussion. It is also at the heart of the opposition of Lefèbvre and his followers against the Council. I do not feel able to give a clear answer to the issues of your book; I can only make a few notes which, in my view, could be important for further discussion.' 1
Lionel: He admits there is a break with the popes. He does not admit that this was  possible onlybecause he assumed invisible cases of the baptism of desire etc were visible exceptions to EENS.So EENS according to the Church Councils which defined it was rejected by him in heresy.It was schism with the past popes.The deception continues.
__________________________

CATHOLIC THEOLOGY MADE CHRISTIAN AND OPENED TO THE LEFT
1. Only thanks to your book has it become clear to me to what extent a new course begins with “Pacem in Terris.” I was aware of how powerful the effect of that encyclical on Italian politics had been: it gave the decisive impulse for the opening up of Christian Democracy to the left. I was not aware, however, of what a new beginning this represented also in relation to the conceptual foundations of that party. And yet, as far as I remember, the issue of human rights actually acquired a place of great significance in the Magisterium and in postconciliar theology only with John Paul II.
Lionel: The Christian Democratic party in Italy has been closed down by the Left. But since the time of Pope Pius XII Italian politics excludes the teaching on the Catholic Church having the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation.
This was accomplised in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case with the Magisterium using a false premise. It was continued with Cardinal Ratzinger as Prefect of the CDF. He maintained the heresy and the false narrative for the liberals and the Masons.

The book refers to the Christian faith and not the Catholic Faith and so does Pope Francis. It praises the separation of Church and State.This is consistent with the  New Theology based on a new understanding of EENS, which makes the dogmatic teaching as it was known for centuries, obsolete, for the liberals and the Left.-Lionel Andrades
1.
https://abyssum.org/2018/05/08/33879/
http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2018/05/08/glory-to-god-that-there-may-

MAY 10, 2018

Matteo Salvini, leader of Eurosceptic party League and Silvio Berlusconi, leader of the Forza Italia party: “We will evaluate the government that is created, supporting any measures that are useful for Italians,” tweeted Mr Berlusconi. Photograph: Giulio Napolitano/Bloomberg

Pope Benedict's book which does not support the non separation of Church and State and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation has theology based upon a lie

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/pope-benedicts-book-which-does-not.html