Recita del Santo Rosario sulla Collina delle Apparizioni - Medjugorje 23 luglio 2022

The professors of theology and religious studies and other departments at Villanova University, Pennsylvania, USA are academically unethical like Massimo Faggioli, when they choose a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so reject Catholic Tradition.

 

The professors of theology and religious studies  and other departments at Villanova University, Pennsylvania, USA are academically unethical like Massimo Faggioli, when they choose a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so reject Catholic Tradition. 

Also the popes, cardinals and bishops are unethical when they use an Irrational Premise to interpret the Council. It is also dishonest at the pontifical and secular universities and the Catholic seminaries, when they use the same False Premise to interpret Magisterial Documents, including the Creeds and Catechisms.

Massimo Faggioli changes the Creed when he interprets Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus irrationally. He must only choose the Rational Premise.

All the popes before the 1930’s taught that there was no salvation outside the Catholic Church. For them hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were not practical exceptions for the dogma EENS (Rational-Feeneyite).

The sedevacantist Bishop Charles McGuire does not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite-Rational) but projects Vatican Council II (Irrational-Cushingite) as contradicting it. He also does not affirm Vatican Council II (Rational-Feeneyite).

The excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney was lifted after he recited the Athanasius Creed which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation. His funeral was held in a Catholic Church with a bishop present.

Vatican Council II (Cushingite-Irrational) is a rejection of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite-Irrational). Vatican Council II (Feeneyite-Rational) is not a rejection of EENS (Feeneyite-Rational). It is not a rejection of the Council of Trent (Feeneyite-Rational) and the past Councils (Feeneyite-Rational).

Now with the Irrational Premise the religious formation of adults and children at First Communion and Confirmation classes, at the sedevacantist communities in Mexico, is the same as the Novus Ordo Church in Rome, or the SSPX chapels, in Italy.

The Sacrament of Confirmation is being conferred only on those who interpret Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise with the approval of the Cushingite bishop.

So the sedevacantists, the liberals and the present two popes are Cushingite when they use the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II. In this way they create a Fake Break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite-Rational).

The Synods are Cushingite and so also are the conferences of the CMRI and the SSPX.

-Lionel Andrades

The false premise is:-

1. Invisible people are visible.

2.Unknown case of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are personally known.

3.The unknown case of the catechumen who desired the baptism of water but dies before he received it and is saved, is a personally known person.

4.There is known salvation outside the Catholic Church for us human beings.

5.We can see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water.

6.We can physically see non Catholics in Heaven and on earth who are saved without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).

7.There are non Catholics who are dead- men visible and walking  who are saved outside the Church.

8.There are known people in invincible ignorance through no fault of their own, who are saved.

9.There are some Anglicans and Protestants whom we know who are going to Heaven even though they are outside the Catholic Church.

10.There are some non Catholics whom we know, who are dead, and now are in Heaven, even though they were not Catholic.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/bradley-eli-at-church-militant-tv-uses.html

 With the false premise there are 'objective exceptions' to EENS. There are visible exceptions to the Athanasius Creed, the Nicene Creed is changed, there is a new understanding of the Nicene Creed etc :-

1. The Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation is contradicted.

2. The Nicene Creed in which we say, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' over the centuries referred  to only one known baptism, the baptism of water.The baptism of desire etc cannot be given to someone like the baptism of water.But now the understanding is ' I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins ( desire,blood and ignorance) and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church'.

3. The Apostles Creed says ' we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church'. Over the centuries it was understood that the Holy Spirit guided the Catholic Church and taught that there was no salvation outside the Church.Now  unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, and LG 8, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are assumd to be objective examples of salvation outside the Church.

4.In the past three Church Councils defined the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) in the extraordinary Magisterium .It was an 'infallible teaching' for Pope Pius X( Letter of the Holy Offie 1949).Now it is obsolete with their being alleged known salvation outside the Church.
5.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are interpreted with the false premise so they become a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.

6.With the false premise the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradict itself. It affirms the strict interpretation of EENS while invincible invincible ignorance is intepreted as referring to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Chuch.Invincible ignorance is not seen as a hypothetical case only.

7.Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus, Ecclesia in Asia, Balamand Declaration  etc were all written upholding the false premise. They did not support exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. So in a subtle way they contradicted EENS(Feeneyite), the Athanasius Creed etc. They did not support the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.They are Christological without the traditional ecclesiocentric ecclesiology. It's Christ without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation.
8. Traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is rejected. Since with the false premise, there is salvation outside the Church.
9.Inter faith marriages which are not Sacraments are common held.It is no more adultery. Since the non Catholic spouse could be saved outside the Church it is assumed. A posibility which could only be known to God is assumed to be a practical exception to EENS and a literally known case of salvation outside the Church in a personal case.
10. There is a new heretical ecclesiology at Holy Mass in all the rites and liturgies. The Latin Mass today does not have the same exclusivist ecclesiology of the Tridentine Rite Mass of the missionaries in the 16th century.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/cardinal-reinhold-marx-of-munich.html

______________________________ 

 

Signore il Tuo Sangue versato dalla Croce apre i nostri cuori al Tuo Amore ed è Vita per noi