Canon Law should apply to those who interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism and so are theologically and doctrinally a break with Tradition,Scripture and the past Magisterium.
Canon Law should apply to Msgr. Stuart Swetland since he interprets Vatican Council II irrationally. He assumes hypothetical references are actual, known persons in the present times.1
So Lumen Gentium 16 would refer to a person saved in invincible ignorance in 2016, or in the past,without the baptism of water.Msgr. Stuart Swetland would then conclude that this person is a known exception to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
He has changed and so rejected Feeneyite EENS and he has changed and rejected the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite).The Nicene Creed's 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' is changed to 'I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins they are the baptism of water, desire, blood, invincible ignorance, seeds of the Word etc.' Most of them are without the baptism of water.
He has also rejected Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and offers Holy Mass with this first class heresy.
Canon Law should apply to Msgr. Stuart Swetland and popes and ecclesiastics in first class heresy according to the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II.
When Msgr. Stuart Swetland changes the Nicene Creed and the defined dogma EENS,it is automatic excommunication.
Now he is unable to proclaim the Catholic Faith. He is not faithful to the teachings of the Catholic Church. He cannot say that that all Jews,Muslims and other non Catholics in 2016 are oriented to the fires of Hell with no known exceptions ( Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1441, Vatican Council II AG 7, LG 14, Dominus Iesus 20 etc, Catechism of the Catholic Church 845,846,1257 etc).They do not have 'faith and baptism'(AG 7, LG 14) , they did not convert into the Catholic Church.