SSPX NEEDS PEGS ON WHICH TO SHOW THE MEDIA THAT VATICAN COUNCIL II IS A TRADITIONAL DOCUMENT AND THEY ACCEPT IT

Here are some pegs.

FR.FRANCOIS LAISNEY'S BOOK
1. Fr. Francois Laisney’s book critical of Fr.Leonard Feeney should be pulled down by the SSPX. It contradicts the SSPX communique (July 19). The ‘uninterrupted magisterium’ (1)  did not consider those saved in invincible ignorance and with implicit desire as explicit possibilities. With LG 16, LG 8 always implicit Vatican Council II (AG 7) affirms the dogma on exclusive salvation. So we have a traditional interpretation of Vatican Council II with the dogma on exclusive salvation supporting  traditional values on other religions, ecclesiology, ecumenism, etc.

The SSPX endorses this interpretation of Vatican Council II according to its communique. Vatican Council II is accepted here.

RESPONDING TO ARCHBSIHOP AUSGUSTINE DI NOIA IN FUTURE

 2. When Archbishop Augustine Di Noia in his next media interview says the SSPX has to accept Vatican Council II and that Jews do not have to convert, cite texts from Vatican Council II which say they do  have to convert (AG 7, NA 4).This interpretation is in line with Tradition and without ‘novelties’.(2)

 It is different from the Vatican Curia‘s interpretation which is a break from tradition. They considered LG 16, LG 8 as implicit. So there  are known dogmatic exceptions for teh Curia.

RESPONDING TO BISHOP MULLER IN FUTURE

3. Recently the CDF Prefect gave an interview to the L'Osservatore Romano and the SSPX just let it pass without responding . The impression people have is that the SSPX rejects Vatican Council II and there is only one interpretation of the Council.

People do not know that the SSPX rejects only the liberal  interpretation of Vatican Council II with ‘novelties’ and which is a break from the ‘uninterrupted magisterium’. It can accept a Vatican Council  II which has the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.

The Vatican Curia wants the SSPX to come out clearly and say they accept the liberal interpretation (with the visible-dead theory). If they do not compromise there will be an ‘ecclesial rupture’.

The SSPX should counter this propaganda of the Curia and state that they accept Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of continuity with the ‘uninterrupted magisteriam’. This is in accord with 'the Roman Catholic Church, the only Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation and no possibility of finding the means that lead to it‘(3)

So the SSPX communique is not a negation of Vatican Council II  according to tradition and it is not an affirmation of Vatican Council II with novelties and irrationality (visible -dead).

Communication must bring out the point: ‘We have said yes to Vatican Council II in line with Tradition and we will continue to criticize the non traditional version which has no rational reference texts from the Council (LG 16, LG 8 are ‘visible dead’ ,irrational non applicable citations).

So when Bishop Gerhard Muller keeps saying that the SSPX must accept Vatican Council II asks for a clarification.Is Bishop Muller saying the SSPX must accept Vatican Council with AG 7 in accord with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Lumen Gentium 16 and Lumen Gentium 8 not being exceptions? This is a Vatican Council II to which the SSPX is open to.

Does Bishop Muller accept Vatican Council II (traditional interpretation)?

The SSPX must find a system to respond to media reports. Vatican Council II and traditional doctrine is on their side.

-Lionel Andrades

 

1.

The Society continues to uphold the declarations and the teachings of the constant Magisterium of the Church in regard to all the novelties of the Second Vatican Council which remain tainted with errors, and also in regard to the reforms issued from it. We find our sure guide in this uninterrupted Magisterium which, by its teaching authority, transmits the revealed Deposit of Faith in perfect harmony with the truths that the entire Church has professed, always and everywhere.

2.
The Society continues to uphold the declarations and the teachings of the constant Magisterium of the Church in regard to all the novelties of the Second Vatican Council which remain tainted with errors


3.
 This is why its seems to us opportune to reaffirm our faith in the Roman Catholic Church, the only Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation and no possibility of finding the means that lead to it; in its monarchical constitution, willed by Our Lord, which means that the supreme power of governance over the whole Church belongs to the pope alone, the Vicar of Christ on earth; in the universal kingship of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the creator of the natural and supernatural order, to whom every human being and all society must submit. - SSPX Communique July 19, 2012(emphasis added).