PHIL LAWLER WANTS THE SSPX TO ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH HERESY-JUST LIKE JEFF MIRUS

Vatican Council II with the false premise of the visible-dead leads to heretical conclusions.Vatican Council II without the false premise of the visible dead is in agreement with the Syllabus of Errors and extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

The interpretation of Vatican council Ii of Jeff Mirus rejects the Nicene Creed (one baptism for the forgiveness of sin-not three baptisms), a dogma Cantate Domino, Council of Florence1441 (extra ecclesiam nulla salus) and the Syllabus of Errors.

Writing for Catholic Culture Phil Lawler who peronally affirms the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and yet , in a contradiction assumes Lumen Gentium 16 ( invincible ignorance) etc are exceptions to the dogma, wants the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) to say Yes to Vatican Council II i.e the heretical version with the visible dead theory.

He does not realize that if the SSPX accepts the Muller-Ladaria version of Vatican Council II it would be  heresy. Since this version because of the Richard Cushing Error , assumes there is salvation outside the Catholic Church. If the SSPX accepts this version of the Council they will be in a first class heresy, and in public mortal sin. They will be denying a defined dogma on salvation and also Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II, with alleged exceptions known to no one on earth.This is heresy even after being informed.

The SSPX Chapter communique (July 19,2012) has made it it possible for the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II as part of 'the uninterrupted magisterium' of the Church.The communique says there are no exceptions to the dogma.Lumen Gentium 16 etc are not exceptions to anything. We have a traditional Council in Vatican Council II with an ecclesiology which is traditional.

So Vatican Council II (AG 7) affirms the SSPX position on other religions and ecumenism ( 'all need Catholic Faith for salvation ) and religious liberty ( which is a consequence of accepting the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus)

So this is not a break with Tradition but a continuity.The Vatican Curia version is without the hermeneutic of continuity and is also public heresy.This version is also being used by Catholic Culture.

-Lionel Andrades