There will be the Rebuilding Cristendom Conference (1) and Catholic Identity Conference (2) in which many of the speakers will criticize Vatican Council II because they are not familiar of the Ruchard Cushing Error which they share.
They will assume that those saved in invincible ignorance though dead are known to us and so are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesaim nula salus. In other words, there is salvation outside the church.
Since there is salvation outside the church according to Vatican Council II for them, the Council is considered a modernist Council.
So the fault is not with the Council. They wrongly assume the dead are visible and so there is salvation outside the church.If there was no salvation outside the church then Vatican Council II would be a traditionalist Council with traditionalist values on religious liberty, other religions and ecumenism.
-Lionel Andrades
1.
2.
http://www.catholicidentity2012.com/
NOVUS ORDO PRIESTS WITH CANONICAL STATUS HAVE AFFIRMED THE DOGMA AND VATICAN COUNCIL II - THEIR VALUES ARE THOSE OF THE SSPX
IF THE SISTERS CAN GET CANONICAL STATUS THEN WHY NOT THE SSPX: THE REAL ISSUE IS THE LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF THE DOGMA AND NOT VATICAN COUNCIL II
Vatican Council II indicates there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church so it makes the old Muller-Ladaria way of understanding Vatican Council II obsolete.
The Cushing problem has been identified and corrected. We cannot know the dead who are saved
SSPX IF THE SISTERS HAVE CANONICAL STATUS SO CAN YOU
SSPX COULD CHOOSE THE SISTERS OF ST.BENEDICT CENTER MODEL FOR AFFIRMING VATICAN COUNCIL II IN ACCORD WITH TRADITION
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment