In silence he concedes that the baptism of desire is not an exception to the dogma and that it is always just a possibility, known to God and unknown to us.It does not contradict the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney so Fr.William Most was wrong.
Now Jeff Mirus knows that the baptism of desire is irrelevant to the literal interpretation of the dogma. So the report Tragic Errors of Fr.Leonard Feeney is obsolete.
Jeff Mirus now holds the same position on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as the SSPX Chapter statement (July 19,2012). He is saying that there is no salvation outside the church like the SSPX. Since there are no known exceptions, as he previously thought there were.
He will also have to review the position of Catholic Culture on Vatican Council II itself.
Lumen Gentium 16 is no more for him an exception to the literal interpretation of the dogma. Since there are no known exceptions in Vatican Council II to extra ecclesiam nulla salus, it means the Council supports the Syllabus of Errors for him.
Vatican Council II is a traditional Council with Ad Gentes 7 saying non Catholics, Protestants included, need Catholic Faith for salvation ( to avoid Hell).-Lionel Andrades
JEFF MIRUS AND PHIL LAWLER DON’T HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/09/jeff-mirus-and-phil-lawler-dont-have.html#links
Posts
2 comments:
We must profess the Truth , on our lips , in our heart, in our mind and soul or otherwise....Revelation 3:16: "But because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold, not hot, I will begin to vomit thee out of my mouth."
Something for those of good will to think and pray about
I see that Mirus' "cash counter" isn't ticking away too fast anymore. Guess people are getting wise to his brand of Katholyc. Of course, there are plenty of "replacement church", EWTN'er-types who can't get enough misinformation.
Post a Comment