Vatican Council II also does not clash with the CDF Notification on Fr.Jacques Dupuis S.J.
How long more before the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) priests and theologians point out to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican that their position on other religions , at least, is in agreement with Vatican Council II ?
We just have to wait until someone figures out that :
1) The baptism of desire is not an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
2) Vatican Council II does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus – and they were all mistaken over so many years.
The SSPX Chapter communiqué (July 19,2012) shows that they understand the baptism of desire is not an exception to anything.
But someone from the SSPX has to say it aloud so that Archbishop Muller can hear it.
Something like, “ Archbishop Muller there is no explicit invincible ignorance and being saved with a good conscience (LG 16). So Vatican Council II agrees with the SSPX position on other religions!”
The Emperor has no clothes!!!!
“Do you accept a Vatican Council II which says Jews have to convert with Catholic Faith and the baptism of water (AG 7) for salvation? LG 16 is not a known exception? Will you accept this interpretation of Vatican Council II ?
“Please stop saying that the SSPX does not accept Vatican Council II . It is you Archbishop Di Noia and Cardinals Ladaria and Koch who do not accept Vatican Council II when you all say that Jews do not have to convert in the present times!!”
-Lionel Andrades
THE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL II IN NO WAY AFFFECTS THE DOGMA OF NO SALVATION OUTSIDE THE CHURCH- Brian Hughes
What has been declared at the second Vatican Council is no new dogma, but merely the reassertion of an ancient truth, and it in no way affects the dogma of "no salvation outside the Church".- Brian Hughes
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/09/the-second-vatican-council-ii-in-no-way.html#links
What has been declared at the second Vatican Council is no new dogma, but merely the reassertion of an ancient truth, and it in no way affects the dogma of "no salvation outside the Church".- Brian Hughes
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/09/the-second-vatican-council-ii-in-no-way.html#links
ROME HAS TO CONVERT WHEN THE SSPX ANNOUNCES RICHARD CUSHING WAS IN HERESY
HERETICAL BAITS PLACED BEFORE THE SSPX FOR CANONICAL STATUS
Traditionalists still can't accept that we do not know any case of the baptism of desire
Fr. Francois Laisney indicates that for the SSPX the Church is no more ecclesiocentric since there are explicit exceptions to the dogma on salvation
RELIGIOUS SUPERIORS IN WORCESTER CANONICALLY HAVE NO RIGHT TO OFFICE: THEY VIOLATE THE NORMS OF THE EUCHARIST TOO JUST LIKE THE LCWR
DID THE LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE 1949 CONTRADICT THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS? NO
CANON 915 ALSO APPLIES TO CARDINAL RAYMOND BURKE
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment