Monday, October 22, 2012

NO SSPX RESPONSE TO TWO QUESTIONS ON RORATE CAELI

The website Rorate Caeli is viewed by the Society of St.Pius X ( SSPX) leaders and supporters. Rorate Caeli posted two questions. No one wants to answer them

Here are the two questions unanswered:

Questions for the SSPX speakers:
1. Do we know in the year 2012 any one saved in invincible ignorance, the baptism of desire, a good conscience, seeds of the word (AG 7), imperfect communion with the Church ?
2. If we do not know any of these cases in 2012 can they be considered exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors?

If they answer 'No we do not know anyone' to Question 1 and 'No they are not exceptions' to Question 2 then would it mean that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre made a mistake about Vatican Council II ? Is this the reason why there is no answer ?

Would it mean that Vatican Council II is saying outside the church there is no salvation? So all non Catholics need to convert into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell?

Does it mean Bishop Bernard Fellay and the SSPX bishops were wrong about Vatican Council II? The Council is traditionalist and not modernist with respect to other religions? The Council is saying that non Catholics need to convert for salvation (AG 7) and invincible ignorance etc (LG 16) are not exceptions to AG 7 ?

Recently a Redemptorist priest in Rome who offers the Novus Ordo Mass said Vatican Council II does not contradict itself (AG 7 does not contradict LG 16 etc) and Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.-Lionel Andrades


RORATE CAELI BLOCKS THE REPORT ‘RAMPANT HERESY IN THE SSPX’
 
SSPX DISTRICT ITALY CONFERENCE ON VATICAN COUNCIL II TO USE THE FALSE PREMISE

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/sspc-district-italy-conference-on.html#links

CLARIFICATION FROM THE SSPX NEEDED
 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/clarification-from-sspx-needed.html#links

SSPX IS CONTRADICTING THE NICENE CREED : THEY BELIEVE IN TWO OR MORE 'KNOWN' BAPTISMS FOR THE FORGIVENESS OF SIN

FATHER NIKLAUS PFLUGER IN FIRST CLASS HERESY ?

Liberals because of the use of the false premise want the Council to be accepted in its present form


REDEMPTORIST PRIEST SAYS VATICAN COUNCIL II DOES NOT CONTRADICT ITSELF NOR THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS


CARDINAL JOSEPH RATZINGER AND ARCHBISHOP MARCEL LEFEBVRE COULD HAVE PREVENTED THE SSPX PROBLEM BY IDENTIFYING THE WRONG PREMISE
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)