The SSPX must bring it to the attention of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Prefect that the baptism of desire is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney.
This changes the entire interpretation of Vatican Council II. For example when we assume that those saved in invincible ignorance are visible and known to us then Lumen Gentium 14 will be interpreted as saying only those who know need to convert for salvation. Those who do not know ( ignorant) and who are on earth and known to us , do not have to convert. They can be saved in invincible ignorance.
Similarly it was said that Fr.Leonard Feeney was wrong since there is a baptism of desire and invincible ignorance , which,being known to us, are exceptions to his literal interpretation.
In other words because these cases with the baptism of desire etc are known to us they are exceptions. If they were not known to us they could bot be exceptions.
So Archbishop Gerhard Muller in the interview with the National Catholic Register this month assumed that those saved in invincible ignorance are exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus. He cited Lumen Gentium 14 as an exception. In other words the dead who are saved are visible and they contradict the traditional understanding of this dogma on exclusive salvation.
The Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) could bring it to the attention of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) that for 19 years the excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feeney was not lifted even though the baptism of desire was not relevant to the dogma.
So the Archbishop of Boston was in heresy for alleging that there were exceptions (known to him) to the defined dogma.
Similarly Archbishop Muller's interpretation of Lumen Gentium 14 is heresy. He is implying that Vatican Council II (LG 14) contradicts extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors.So every one does not have to convert in the present times for him. This also contradicts Vatican Council II (AG 7). Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism.
Now he expects the SSPX to use his heretical interpretation of Vatican Council II,which is also irrational,since we cannot see the deceased saved in 2012. This interpretation also does not have the hermeneutic of continuity that Pope Benedict XVI mentioned.
The SSPX referred to extra ecclesiam nulla salus in the last Chapter statement (July 19,2012) it also affirmed its support for the 'uninterrupted magisterium' which always endorsed extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Pope Pius XII referred to it as 'the dogma', the 'ìnfallible teaching' so it was not just something of the past.The dogma of the Trinity is even older than extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
-Lionel Andrades
ARCHBISHOP GERHARD MULLER CHOOSES A HERETICAL INTERPRETATION OF LUMEN GENTIUM 14 WHICH IS A BREAK FROM TRADITION
For nearly 20 years the Holy Office(CDF) and the Archbishop of Boston did not lift the excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feeney when the baptism of desire was never ever an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
ARCHBISHOPS IN HERESY EXCOMMUNICATING THE INNOCENT
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment