SSPX repeats heresy of rejecting Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with allegedly visible cases of persons saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire.
The SSPX U.S website has reposted an article by Fr.Francois Laisney which indicates that the baptism of desire is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) is still struck with the dead man walking on earth virus. Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops have also assumed that the baptism of desire is relevant to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney.
The SSPX U.S website has reposted an article by Fr.Francois Laisney which indicates that the baptism of desire is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) is still struck with the dead man walking on earth virus. Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops have also assumed that the baptism of desire is relevant to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney.
This means the SSPX still interprets the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 as a break with Tradition. So they would also be interpreted Vatican Council II, Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance etc) as a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors.Then they blame Vatican Council II !
Without the premise of the dead man walking saved with the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance, the interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Vatican Council II changes.
So much of analysis and verbiage and yet Fr. Laisney and Fr.Peter Scott on this website will not answer two simple questions.
Fr.Francois Laisney and the SSPX are making the same error of the progressives. The assume the dead saved can be seen and then presume that these cases are exceptions or relevant to the literal interpretaion of Fr.Leonard Feeney.
The SSPX General Chapter has stated that there are no exceptions- Fr.Laisney says there are exceptions to the dogma!
Whether the baptism of desire results in justification or salvation is irrelevant to the dogma since we do not know and cannot know any of these cases.
-Lionel Andrades
http://sspx.org/miscellaneous/feeneyism/three_errors_of_feeneyites.htm
http://www.sspx.org/miscellaneous/various_churches_fr_laisney_12-21-2012.htm
Tuesday, December 25, 2012
SSPX CORRECT YOUR DOCTRINAL ERROR AND APPEAL TO THE CDF TO DO THE SAME
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/12/sspx-correct-your-doctrinal-error-and.html#links
Tuesday, December 25, 2012
SSPX CORRECT YOUR DOCTRINAL ERROR AND APPEAL TO THE CDF TO DO THE SAME
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/12/sspx-correct-your-doctrinal-error-and.html#links
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment