The Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae (CMRI) also has many religious just like the SSPX.There website indicates that they also wrongly assume implicit salvation referred in Vatican Council II is explicit.
After Archbishop Gerhard Muller's statement on Vatican Council II not being a break with the past and those who consider it as such is heretical,traditional and progressives, this is the time to dialogue with the CMRI.
CMRI’s Theological PositionThe Roman Catholic priests of the Religious Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen profess and adhere to the Catholic Faith as it has been consistently taught throughout the centuries since the time of Christ. With the death of Pope Pius XII and with the convocation of the Second Vatican Council, an unprecedented situation has befallen the Church, which threatens her very doctrines and worship. In order to provide for the preservation of the Catholic Faith and the traditional Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and Sacraments, the following statement has been drawn up for the purpose of clearly defining the actual position that these priests have taken.I. VATICAN COUNCIL II: Convoked by John XXIII for the purpose of “updating” the Church, this council (held from 1962-65) decreed and implemented teachings which had been previously condemned by the Infallible Teaching Magisterium of the Church. The Second Vatican Council’s heretical teachings were primarily in the areas of religious liberty and false ecumenism. These were previously condemned by:Pope Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos (1832)Pope Pius IX in Quanta Cura and Syllabus of Errors (1864)Pope Leo XIII in Immortale Dei (1865) and Libertas Humana (1888)Pope Pius XI in Quas Primas (1925) and Mortalium Animos (1928)Pope Pius XII in Mystici Corporis (1943)THEREFORE, the Second Vatican Council is to be rejected as a false council because it has erred in its teachings on faith and morals.For example Vatican Council II does not contradict Mystici Corporis since Pope Pius XII does not state that those saved in invincible ignorance are known to us. SInce they are not known they do not contradict the dogma on salvation.
The CMRI assumes there are known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors and there is no one from Ecclesia Dei speaking to them about this.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
1 comment:
It would be wise to learn the lesson as it occurred in the case of Saint Dismas. No one could have predicted or told Dismas ahead of time that Salvation as granted to him by Jesus was a known option or path to be taught for eternal happiness in Paradise. Only Jesus could and did grant this supernatural reward to Dismas. Just as we acknowledge today that we can hope and pray for God's unknown mercies, it is nonetheless expected of us to teach that which is specifically KNOWN to us on earth as paths of Salvation and leave the unknown mercies to God. Baptism of Desire and Invincible Ignorance belong solely in principle to God alone. We would do a grave disservice and probable eternal harm to teach these possibilities as explicit exceptions known to us on Earth.
As incredibly hard it is to be worthy of entering Heaven by the benefits of Baptism of water, confession, the Eucharist and Sacraments , how nearly impossible might it be to reach Heaven without these aids from Heaven.
Yes it is possible to seek God with a sincere heart but we must also recognize the possibility that many may be sincerely wrong and that is far more likely. Not getting Baptism of Desire and Invincible Ignorance correct has ruptured our mission to teach the Faith.
Post a Comment