The only real doctrinal issue between Fr.Arnaud Rostand and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is that of the false premise in Vatican Council II.

 Fr. Arnaud Rostand is interviewed by Gloria TV and  The Remnant newspaper.Neither does Gloria TV, The Remnant or the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) Superior in the USA, realize that they are using a false premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and this is the only doctrinal issue or error.

If it is said that Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors then it is implied that the false premise is being used by the person interpreting the Council.The false premise is assuming that the dead saved in invincible ignorance etc are visible exceptions to the dogma on salvation.Irrational? Yes but this is the false premise being used.

This is the basis for the Jewish Left saying often that Vatican Council II has ushered in a 'revolution' in the Catholic Church.

When Wikipedia for instance says Lumen Gentium 16 ( invincible ignorance and a good conscience) is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, they mean, one can see cases on earth saved in invincible ignorance etc.If we did not know these cases obviously they would not be 'exceptions'.

This is the key doctrinal issue omitted in the Vatican-SSPX talks.The actual doctrinal issue which makes the Council traditional or modernist was not discussed.-Lionel Andrades

http://www.sspx.org/district_superiors_letters.htm

http://www.sspx.org/District_Superiors_Ltrs/against_the_rumors_fr_rostand_interview_6-11-2012.htm

The 'enemies of the Church' are using the false premise: Fr.Arnaud Rostand misses this point

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/01/the-enemies-of-church-are-using-false.html#links