Liberal dioceses and communities interpret the Catechism on morals and faith(salvation) with an irrationality

Usually a diocese or religious community is liberal/progressivist because they have changed  the teachings of the Catholic Church on morals and faith by interpreting the Catechism of the Catholic Church with an irrationality.Once the irrationality is identified and the change made the community or diocese has a traditional interpretation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

I am thinking of communities  who interpret the Catechism on salvation (846)  by assuming we can judge those saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire. The catechism does not state that these cases are physically visible to us and so are exceptions.However it is wrongly assumed as such.There is a new doctrine created there is a change in doctrine.

When there is dissent on a faith doctrine it is possible that there will follow dissent on morals.

It is assumed that we can judge in the case of morals, known exceptions to the traditional teaching on mortal sin.Deliberate consent and full knowledge mentioned in the catechism as conditions for mortal sin are assumed to be known exceptions to be able to say clearly that a mortal sin is a mortal as mentioned in Veritatis Splendor. So there are liberal Catholics who say that we can no more judge if immodesty in clothes is a mortal sin. Since for them the objective reality does not indicate the subjective thinking. This is  contrary to Veritatis Splendor. Neither does the Catechism of the Catholic Church mention this way of thinking.

The liberals assume that the subjective thinking of a Catholic in mortal sin , is assumed to be objective and innocent.As if they can read minds and  visibly see thoughts and motivation. In other words they can judge.They will judge the way they want to.They  assume that full knowledge and deliberate consent are objective even though the Catechism does not say this.

 

If they are not objective how can they be new exceptions to the traditional thinking on mortal sin?

This is irrational. We cannoy  judge or see or know the subjective thinking of a person who is in obvious mortal sin. We cannot say that he has a fundamental option for good or that we can read thoughts of the lack of full knowledge, deliberate consent or freedom in action.

In the dioceses of England, Australia i have noticed  these two errors are made regarding mortal sin and the issue of outside the church there is no salvation.Mortal Sins of faith and morals are condoned because of an irrational interpretation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church  and persons in obvious mortal sin are allowed to receive the Eucharist.

-Lionel Andrades