...some of their members (SSPX) have a radical almost Feenyite interpretation of EENS which is in complete contradiction to Lefebvre himself...
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre can be interpreted with or without the Richard Cushing Error. In this comment above it is obvious the Richard Cushing Error is being used.
Archbishop Lefebvre has stated:
"Consider a Hindu in Tibet who has no knowledge of the Catholic Church. He lives according to his conscience and to the laws which God has put into his heart. He can be in the state of grace, and if he dies in this state of grace, he will go to heaven.” (The Angelus, “A Talk Heard Round the World,” April, 2006, p. 5.)
With the Richard Cushing Error this would be interpreted as consider a Hindu in Tibet who has no knowledge of the Catholic Church, lives according to his conscience and to the laws which God has put into his heart and who dies in a state of grace and will go to Heaven - and who is personally known to us , and who is physically visible to us and so is a known exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla saus.He is an exception to the literal interpretation of the dogma by Fr.Leonard Feeney.
Without the Richard Cushing Error this would be interpreted as consider a Hindu in Tibet who has no knowledge of the Catholic Church and lives according to his conscience and to the laws which God has put into his heart and who dies in a state of grace and will go to Heaven and who is NOT personally known to us , and who is NOT physically visible to us and so is an UNKNOWN person and so is NOT an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla saus.He is NOT an exception to the literal interpretation of the dogma by Fr.Leonard Feeney.
It's the same Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre but interpreted with or without the Richard Cushing Error.
Without the Richard Cushing Error Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the members of the Society of St.Pius X are in agreement with the communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in 2013.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment