The SSPX's position that the Second Vatican Council has errors has once again been vindicated - and this time by a bishop in good standing.-SSPX USA
Even a young boy in school will know Vatican Council II will contain errors, and be a break with Tradition, if the visible dead theory is being used.If an irrational premise is used in any Church document it will emerge ambigous and confusing.
The Society of St.Pius X (USA) website assumes there are known exceptions in 2013 to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. They are using this irrationality in the interpretation of the Lettter of the Holy Office 1949 relative to Fr.Leonard Feeney.
The Letter of the Holy Office mentions the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus 'the infallible teaching' and also mentions the possibility of being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire.
The Letter does state that Fr.Leonard Feeney was excommunicated for heresy (SSPX assumes it does), it does not state the baptism of desire is visible to us on earth(SSPX assumes it does) it does not state that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are defacto, known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(SSPX assumes it is). So with all this irrationality the SSPX has interpreted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and then has extended it to Vatican Council II.
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre mentioned that a Hindu in Tibet could be saved in his religion and the SSPX bishops and priests assume that this Hindu in Tibet was a known exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The Hindu in Tibet, if he is saved, is only a possibility for , it can only be a possibility for us, since it is known to God only.The SSPX bishops and priests interpreted the Hindu in Tibet as being a known reality.
So with this heresy of allegedly knowing exceptions to the dogma on salvation the SSPX USA has also contradictd the SSPX General Chapter Statement last July which stated there are no exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
It is unfortunate that the SSPX error is widespread in the Catholic Church and is shared by the liberals and also Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Michael Voris.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment