I have sent the post on this blog Bishop Michael Olson has faculties to offer Holy Mass while denying the Catholic Faith in public to the bishops office at Fort Worth,Texas and have not received any response. The bishop has not also answered the questions about the Traditional Latin Mass being stopped at the Fischer More College, asked of him by priests and bloggers.Neither is he willing to say that all Muslims are oriented to Hell according to Vatican Council II unless they convert into the Catholic Church. Nor is he willing to say that the Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that all Jews, Muslims, Protestants and other non Catholics need to enter the Church 'as through a door 'for salvation (CCC846).
Instead at Fort Worth and the rest of the Dallas it is being taught that being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) refers to known cases in the present times who are exceptions to Ad Gentes 7. In other words these cases of the deceased are visible to the bishop at Fort Worth.
According to Vatican Council II all need 'faith and baptism' for salvation. Mohammad did not have faith and baptism. According to Vatican Council II he was oriented to Hell. The ordinary means of salvation is faith and baptism. It is not invincible ignorance.
Also the Quran shows that Mohammad knew about the Catholic Church and yet he did not enter. So he was not in invincible ignorance. According to Vatican Council II (Lumen Gentium 14), he knew and did not enter so he could not be saved.
This is the teaching being denied in public by Bishop Michael Olson.
On a televisied talk (1) he has not affirmed Vatican Council II (AG 7), the Catechism of the Catholic Church (846), the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Nicene Creed. Neither has he proclaimed these magisterial documents with accompanying teaching, at any public forum. Yet he retains faculties to offer Holy Mass and has used his office to ban the Traditional Latin Mass at the Fischer More College .
This is contrary to Canon Law. Since the bishop, a juridical person, according to Canon Law denies teachings of the Catholic Church. It is obligatory for him to affirm these teachings to stay in office. Yet he has faculties to offer Holy Mass and to remove these faculties from others in the diocese.
He denied aspects of Vatican II in the video distributed by a former board member of the Fisher More College. He denied Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II which says all need to enter the Church for salvation. All would include the members sitting at the Town Hall meeting with the bishop. He also did not affirm the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846 which states all need to enter the Church as through a door. There are no exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II or the Catechism of the Catholic Church to AG 7 and CCC 846 or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
In the Nicene Creed we pray, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sin'. This was not told to the Jewish professor . Neither did he tell the Christians there that they need Catholic Faith (AG 7), the Sacraments and the moral and faith teachings of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell .
Canon 1225 states “All sacred celebrations can be performed in legitimately established oratories except those which the law or a prescript of the local ordinary excludes or the liturgical norms prohibit.”
How can a sacred celebration be performed by a bishop who in public denies the Catholic faith and has never affirmed it in the media ?
Video : Bishop Michael Olson does not affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church according to Vatican Council II