http://www.raoulwallenberg.net/news/israeli-parliament-will-hold-special-meeting-to-pay-tribute-to-pope-john-xxiii/
The inference is not theology or a doctrine I mentioned in a previous post. To infer that the dead-saved with ' a ray of the Truth' is visible to us is an intellectual observation. It is an inference.
Upon this intellectual observation is built the Jewish Left theology for Catholics, which says all do not need to enter the Catholic Church for salvation. In other words Jews do not need to convert. This is how the Jewish ADL understands Vatican Council II, according to its website. So the Vatican Council II initiated by Pope John XXIII is to receive a special tribute from the Zionists.They use an irrational inference.
The political Left, infer in Ad Gentes 7, that all do not need to enter the Church but only 'those who know' about Jesus and the Church and they are visible on earth. They are visible on earth, thats the catch!
If they were not visible on earth, it would mean that all need faith and baptism for salvation (AG 7).There would be no exceptions.
Remember, we do not know who 'knows' about the Church (AG 11,LG 14) and is damned and who was in invincible ignorance(LG 16) and was saved.When they are invisible for us they refer to implicit cases and not explicit cases. They are not exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.For the liberal Jewish rabbis these cases are not invisible for us but visible in the flesh. So they become exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Remember, we do not know who 'knows' about the Church (AG 11,LG 14) and is damned and who was in invincible ignorance(LG 16) and was saved.When they are invisible for us they refer to implicit cases and not explicit cases. They are not exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.For the liberal Jewish rabbis these cases are not invisible for us but visible in the flesh. So they become exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
When Cardinal Gerhard Muller was asked about the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus , he said 'The Second Vatican Council also said this: Lumen Gentium 14 says: “Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved.” 1 He is inferring here that 'whosoever knowing' refers to cases visible to us on earth. So they become explicit exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This inference is irrational.It is the familiar visible-dead premise.
Once it is understood that the inference is false and irrational the canonical-status position of the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) changes dramatically. This is the Vatican Council II of Pope John XXIII.
1. We can affirm all texts and documents in Vatican Council II in accord with the traditional and literal interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus. We can affirm the dogma on exclusive salvation according to the Church Councils, the popes, saints,Fr. Leonard Feeney and the SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012.2 The Zionists cannot do so.
2.Nostra Aetate 2 (saved with a ray of the Truth) does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Nostra Aetate is in agreement with the SSPX traditional position on other religions and salvation.
3.Unitatitis Redintigratio 3 ( imperfect communion with the Church) does not contradict the dogma on exclusive salvation.We do not know anyone in 2014 saved in imperfect communion with the Church.We cannot name anyone.
4.Ad Gentes 11 ( seeds of the Word) does not contradict the dogma on exclusive salvation, the Catechism of Pope Pius X or the Syllabus of Errors.
5.Lumen Gentium 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth) does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus .This is the Vatican Council II of Pope John XXIII.
6.Dignitatis Humanae says a Catholic has a right to proclaim his Faith. This would be done with the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Church.
DH says in a state with a secular Constitution a non Catholic is legally free to profess his religion.This is a defacto situation in which Catholics can still at all levels ( political etc) affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus i.e non Catholics are oriented to Hell unless they convert into the Catholic Church.
7.Gaudium et Specs does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which says 'all' need 'faith and baptism' for salvation.AG 7 is in agreement with the dogma on salvation and there are no exceptions mentioned in any text of Vatican Council II to AG 7.
The key to this interpretation of Pope John XXIII's Vatican Council II is of course the inference.
Once it is understood that we cannot infer that the deceased-saved are visible to us, Vatican Council II changes radically.The Jewish Left interpretation of Vatican Council II then becomes irrational.
It would also mean that Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits in Boston, a Jewish Left stronghold, were in heresy for implying (inferring) that there were explicit exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
The Vatican Council II being tributed by the Jewish Left uses a false inference which results in an irrational theology. Without the false premise Pope John XXIII and Pope Paul VI's Vatican Council II is in agreement with Catholic Tradition. The teachings of the Catholic Church are the same before and after Vatican Council II.
-Lionel Andrades
1
NCR:
Do you, nevertheless, accept there’s been a weakening of the Church’s teaching because of this underlying confusion of terminology? One example sometimes cited is that the teaching of “no salvation outside the Church” seems to have become less prominent.
Archbishop Gerhard Muller:
That has been discussed, but here, too, there has been a development of all that was said in the Church, beginning with St. Cyprian, one of the Fathers of the Church, in the third century. Again, the perspective is different between then and now. In the third century, some Christian groups wanted to be outside the Church, and what St. Cyprian said is that without the Church a Christian cannot be saved. The Second Vatican Council also said this: Lumen Gentium 14 says: “Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved.” He who is aware of the presence of Revelation is obliged by his conscience to belong publicly — and not only in his conscience, in his heart — to this Catholic Church by remaining in communion with the Pope and those bishops in communion with him.
2
it seems opportune that we reaffirm our faith in the Roman Catholic Church, the unique Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation nor possibility to find the means leading to salvation;...
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment