Saturday, July 26, 2014

Fr. Benedict Hughes, Rector of sedevacantist CMRI seminary will not answer two questions

Fr. Benedict Hughes,  is the Rector of the St. Joseph Minory Seminary, USA of the sedevacantist Catholic community CMRI (Congregatio Mariae Regina Immaculatae). He will not answer two questions, related to the Catholic Faith,  which I have sent him.
The TWO QUESTIONS are also not answered by Cardinal George Pell.It is also being avoided by Mons.Leuzzi,an auxiliary bishop in Rome.
Here are the two questions I sent the CMRI rector.
1) Do we personally know the dead now saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16) etc,can we see them, are they physically visible to us in 2014 ?
2) Since we do not know any of these cases, in real life, they are not visible to us, there are no known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, or Ad Gentes 7 which state 'all' need 'faith and baptism' for salvation ?
photo of Bishop Mark Pivarunas
Their Superior General ,Bishop Mark Pivarunas will also not answer the two questions.Over the years he has assumed that the baptism of desire refers to objectively visible cases.He uses the irrational right hand side column in the interpretation of magisterial documents.1
Cardinal George Pell and Mons. Leuzzi 2 may have discovered that they are using an irrationality in the interpretation of magisterial documents including Vatican Council II. They use this irrational reason in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.Then they accept Vatican Council II. Bishop Pivarunas and Fr.Benedict Hughes use the same irrational reasoning and reject Vatican Council II.
For me Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.All salvation mentioned in Vatican Council II is invisible for me. So there are no explict exceptions to the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
-Lionel Andrades
 
1
There are Catholic religious and lay persons who use the the left hand side column in the interpretation of magisterial text 
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/there-are-catholic-religious-and-lay.html#links

Ecclesiastical blackmail?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/ecclesiastical-blackmail.html#links

Franciscans of the Immaculate being forced to choose the right hand side column in the interpretation of Vatican Council II : conscience issue, injustice being done

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/franciscans-of-immaculate-being-forced.html#links 

In Catechesis in Catholic families the right hand column is used in the intepretation of magisterial documents, including Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/in-catechesis-in-catholic-families.html#links 

SSPX considers Nostra Aetate an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Catechism of Pope Pius X-this is heresy and irrationality

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/sspx-consider-nostra-aetate-exception.html#links 

Even if a non Catholic was saved in his religion or by his religion the case is implicit for us: Bishop Fellay uses the right hand column

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/even-if-non-catholic-was-saved-in-his.html#links
 
2.

Posted by at
Labels: ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)