Franciscan Capuccin Curia In Rome also use the false premise and do not deny it.
It is now clear. There has been no denial from the Apostolic Commissioner of the Franciscans of the Immaculate, Fr.Fidenzio Volpi OFM Cap.He has been assuming that that all salvation mentioned in Vatican Council II is visible in the flesh for us in 2014. So he wrongly infers that these deceased-visible are exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation.
This is how he interprets Vatican Council II. He uses a false premise and so the Council emerges irrational and a break with Tradition.
He wants the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, the main body of the community founded by Fr.Stefano Manelli, to also use the false premise and interpret the Council as a break with traditional dogmas and doctrine.
These blog posts have been sent to them. No one has objected to what I have said.There have been no corrections on doctrine since I am not denying Vatican Council II. I am only calling attention to an objective error.It is common knowledge that we cannot see the dead in Heaven.
The same error is being made by the Franciscan Capuchin Curia in Rome. They are not correcting me and neither are they affirming Vatican Council II without the false premise and in harmony with Catholic Tradition.
Similarly Fr.Angelo Geiger on the new website of the Franciscans of the Immaculate claims he affirms the hermeneutic of continuity.However he will not green light Vatican Council II with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So it is really a hermeneutic of discontinuity.
This is an error they have overlooked and I don't think the mistake is being made with bad faith.
Fr.Serafino M.Lanzetta and Fr.Paolo M.Siano priests of the Franciscans of the Immaculate known for their excellent research on the Freemasons have criticized Vatican Council II as a break with the past.They are referring to Vatican Council II with the false premise. Without the irrational premise, Vatican Council is not a break with the dogma on exlcusive salvation in the Chruch, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechsim of Pope Pius X.
Similarly the Vatican Council II criticized by Bruno Gherardini and Roberto de Mattei is not Vatican Council II as I understand and interpret it.For me LG 16,LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc do not refer to visible exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Let us hope that they all will discuss this issue and put things in order once again, as in pre 1949-times.This will help the Franciscans of the Immaculate to affirm Vatican Council II and also the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the rest of Sacred Tradition.
-Lionel Andrades
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment