The Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) must point out to the Vatican the Marchetti error carried over into Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus and other magisterial documents.1 I am not an SSPX spokesman. I suggest that they (SSPX) who are in contact with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) officials clarify this issue.
The SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012(GCS) has affirmed extra ecclesiam nullas salus (EENS) with there being no exceptions, while the Marchetti error infers there are explicit exceptions to EENS.
Cardinal Marchetti did not know any one saved outside the Church in 1949 i.e without faith and baptism - and no magisterial document before 1949 implied this. So there was no basis for his 'new revelation'.
The SSPX should not be asked to accomodate Marchetti's inference in the interpretation of Church-documents, including Vatican Council II. This is not fair.
When Vatican Council II refers to 'those who know and yet do not enter' the Church (LG 14) it is a reference to people known only to God.
So this cannot be an explicit exception in 2015 to the General Chapter Statement. The GCS affirmed EENS according to Feeneyism.Those 'who know and do not enter' and 'those in invincible ignorance' are invisible for us in real life, they are irrelevant to EENS.All need to be formal members of the Catholic Church for salvation ( with faith and baptism).We do not know any one saved in invincible ignorance or someone 'who knows' and does not enter the Church and so will be damned.
Why does the CDF want the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II presuming hypothetical cases are objectively known in the present times? Not real!
There is no rational basis for the CDF rejecting the GCS doctrinally.The SSPX must not have to approve the visible-dead theory.How can persons in Heaven be explicit exceptions on earth to the de fide teaching expressed in the GCS?
This is new information for the SSPX too. It was not known in the SSPX-Vatican talks initiated by Pope Benedict XVI.The Marchetti visible-dead theory was not discussed.Both sides were using theology based on the false premise.
It is in harmony with the SSPX position on an ecumenism of return and the need for non Christians to formally convert into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell.
Ask the CDF to make the first move towards reconciliation and endorse a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II.This would be one without the dead-man walking theory.Vatican Council II in a sense would then be different.
So the rules for granting the SSPX full canonical status would also have changed.The Anglican and Opus Dei Ordinariate and the whole Church would affirm a traditional Vatican Council II in line with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
The SSPX must ask the CDF to clarify that Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the irrational Marchetti inference.
-Lionel Andrades
1
Dominus Iesus, Redemptoris Missio carry the Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani mistake http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/dominus-iesus-redemptoris-missio-carry.html
Archbishop Gerhard Muller was using the false premise : here is the proof!
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/06/archbishop-gerhard-muller-was-using.html
Remnant newspaper and Fr.Francois Laisney (SSPX) contradict the General Chapter Statement 2012 which said there are no exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/09/remnant-newspaper-and-frfrancois.html
Meeting needed between Ecclesia Dei/CDF, SSPX,CMRI and others: all agree that the baptism of desire is not an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment