SSPX, MICM and traditionalists are interpreting Vatican Council II according to the Left

What would be the reaction of the Jewish Left if the traditionalists said that Vatican Council II says all Jews and other non Catholics need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell and there is no ambiguity in the Council ?

Possibly they would declare Vatican Council II as being anti-Semitic and criminal !

Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) does say all need faith and baptism and Vatican Council II does not say that LG 16,LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to known exceptions to AG 7 and LG 14 in the present times.No where does the Council say that LG 16 etc refers to known exceptions in the present times to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. For there to be an exception it would have to be known in the present times.

Yet this is not how the SSPX and  MICM interpret Vatican Council II. They infer that LG 16 is an exception.The text does not say it. It has to be implied.The Left implies it. So do the traditionalists.Check the sedevacantists websites. It is the same mistake there too.

They interpret Vatican Council II similar to the Jewish Left.They are liberals on Vatican Council II.

Since for them LG 16 etc refers to known exceptions in the present times to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is the theology used by the liberals and it is approved by the ADL etc.

The SSPX and the MICM are using the same Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani theology as the Vatican.It is approved by liberal rabbis.

If they did not assume LG 16 etc referred to known cases in the present times, they would be accused of various crimes under  laws placed all over the world by the Jewish Left.This includes Italy.

The SSPX and MICM are not saying that every one needs to be a card carrying member of the Catholic Church according to Vatican Council II. Nor will they say that the Council affirms the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no ambiguity and all in 2015 need to have their names on the parish baptism register to go to Heaven and avoid Hell.

They are avoiding tension with the Vatican and the Jewish Left which misuses the anti Semitic and other laws.

-Lionel Andrades

 

VATICAN COUNCIL II SAYS

http://www.eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/vatican-council-ii-says.html

 

Every one needs to be a card carrying member of the Catholic Church today for salvation

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/every-one-needs-to-be-card-carrying.html

Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary liberalism: same as Cardinal Walter Kaspar

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/slaves-of-immaculate-heart-of-mary.html

 

Compartmentalise your thinking on the baptism of desire and blood with the dogma http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/compartmentalise-your-thinking-on.html

Can you look at this issue without the models used by the SSPX and the MICM ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/can-you-look-at-this-issue-without.html

CM,SSPX,MICM deny the Faith to please superiors

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/cmsspxmicm-deny-faith-to-please.html

 

Prof. Roberto de Mattei also uses apparition theology

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/prof-roberto-de-mattei-also-uses.html

 

 

Any one who says that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are linked to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is a liberal
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/any-one-who-says-that-baptism-of-desire.html

Questions and Answers : Vatican Council II affirms the Social Kingship of Christ the King
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-vatican-council_7.html

Questions and Answers : Evangelizing with Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-evangelising-with.html

Questions and Answers : Vatican Council II is Feeneyite. It has an exclusivist ecclesiology
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-vatican-council.html