@AndradesLionel V.gr., U.R. and D.H. contradict "Mortalium Animos" and "Quanta Cura-Syllabus"; they oppose and deny each other per diametrum
Vatican Council II (UR and DH) would contradict Mortalium Animos, Quanta Cura and the Syllabus of Errors only if B is an exception to A.1
For me B is not an exception to A. There can be no text in Unitatis Redintegratio or Dignitatis Humanae to contradict the Syllabus of Errors, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or other traditional teachings.2
This mistake is made by the sedevacantist and traditionalist websites.Since they assume B is an exception to A. So Vatican Council II would contradict Tradition and in particular the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. There would be explicit, known exceptions to the dogma in the present times due to the irrational reasoning.The fault is not with the Council but with the irrational premise and inference used.Instead of defending Feeneyism, which is traditional, they are supporting irrational and heretical Marchettiism.-Lionel Andrades
Vatican Council II says outside the Church there is no salvation and is in agreement with the Syllabus of Errors, Mystici Corporis,Quanto Conficiamus etc.
No text in Quanto Conficiamur Moerore or the Council of Trent says there are exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
The Council of Trent does not state that these cases are physically or personally known to us to be exceptions to the dogma.This has to be wrongly inferred.