Sunday, April 24, 2016

Bishop Sanborn uses situation ethics, subjectivism and known exceptions to EENS, as a reasoning, to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition.The liberals do the same

Related imageThe same people who are now saying there are known exceptions in real life to manifest mortal sin once said there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)  and Bishop Donald Sanborn and the sedevacantists accepted this hook, line and sinker.
The website 1 of Bishop Sanborn's Most Holy Family Seminary, Florida is similar to that of the liberals.He uses situation ethics, subjectivism and known exceptions to EENS, as a reasoning, to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with EENS and Tradition.The liberals do the same.He is affirming the Jewish Left policy for the Catholic Church, which the Vatican has already rubber stamped.
Instead with Feeneyism, I reject situation ethics, subjective-things-are- objective reasoning  and 'known exceptions' to EENS. So Vatican Council II is not a break with Tradition for me.I am not a Mason.
Bishop Sanborn's sedevacantism is based on accepting Vatican Council II with situation ethics, subjectivism seen as being objective, and so there are physically known exceptions to EENs, people seen in the flesh in 2016.People in Heaven saved outside the Church who are seen on earth!
His interpretation of Vatican Council II would be different with Feeneyism which says there are no known exceptions to EENS, we cannot see baptism of desire cases on earth, there are no situations when we can meet someone saved without faith and baptism  and there are no objective exceptions of persons saved with a good conscience but without the baptism of water.For the bishop there are such cases.His interpretation of Vatican Council II is based on such irrationality.Since this was the error of his religious formators when he was young.
Now it is difficult for him to break away from all this conditioning.He thinks it is magisterial.The irrational reasoning and new theology which he uses, is for him, part of the Deposit of the Faith.
His website does not state that Vatican Council II indicates Judaism and Islamism are not paths to salvation and their members are oriented to Hell without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7, LG 14). He's a liberal. So for him LG 16 ( invincible ignorance and good conscience) refers to known exceptions in the present times,to AG 7 and LG 14 and the dogma EENS.His seminary has a politically correct and non controversial website.
-Lionel Andrades


The sedevacantist Bishop Sanborn uses Cushingism to interpret Vatican Council II and seems unaware of the Feeneyite choice
Ave Maria University like the sedevacantist seminary in Florida uses irrational Cushingism instead of traditional Feeneyism to interpret Vatican Council II

Florida seminaries and universities unaware: Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the theology of Feeneyism or Cushingism


Vatican Council II and Islam : two interpretations

At the 'New Traditional College' will the faculty interpret magisterial documents with Feeneyism or Cushingism ?

The new theology of the sedevacantists and traditionalists like that of the liberals says all Muslims do not need to convert into the Catholic Church

Sedevacantists after months of discussions cannot answer if Lumen Gentium 16 is explicit or implicit and if it is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus 

Immagine correlata
Sedevacantists are teaching irrationality

Related image
Bishop Donald Sanborn like Bishop Fellay has made the same mistake : so have Reuters and AP correspondents

Immagine correlata

Sedevacantist seminary repeats the error of the Baltimore Catechism

Immagine correlata
Holy Trinity Seminary does not clarify if they refer to Vatican Council II in which LG 16, LG 8 is visible or invisible

Immagine correlata

Sedevacantist article on ecclesiology has the same connfusion as the Pontifical universities and seminaries which they call 'modernist'.

Immagine correlata
Sedevacantist and Roman bishops and clergy want to remain politically correct

Bishop Sanborn and Fr.Anthony Cekada do not have a single source to support their position. Not a single reference!

Four months and the sedevacantists will not answer if LG 16 is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

Wikipedia and Most Holy Trinity,Florida sedevacantist seminary make the same error

Does BOD and I.I refer to visible or invisible cases in 2015 where you live? is a difficult question for a sedevacantist priest
 Sedevacantist seminary is not aware of superflous passages in Vatican Council II originating from the 1949 Marchetti error

Most Rev. Donald Sanborn, Fr. Cekada, Fr. Joseph Selway, Fr. Nicolas Désposito, Rev. Julian Larrabee.- ALL SILENT


There is a mistake on the webpage of the sedevacantist Most Holy Trinity seminary. No one issues a correction/clarification

No comments: