There is a factual mistake in Vatican Council II. It is a subtle error but it is obvious now. This should be brought to the attention of the Vatican Curia. Ask the Congregationm for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) and Ecclesia Dei to acknowledge it.Then most important, ask the CDF to re-interpret Vatican Council II without this error.
Since Vatican Council II was always an issue and recently Pope Francis said that the SSPX would have to accept Vatican Council II ask the CDF/Ecclesia Dei to confirm that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Feeneyism.
1.Hypothetical cases are assumed to be only hypothetical.
2.There are no explicit and personally known cases of people saved in invincible ignorance( LG 16) and the baptism of desire( LG 14) in 2016( with or without the baptism of water).
3. LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to invisible- for- us cases in 2016.They do not contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.
4.Pope Benedict XVI was wrong. There is no 'development' of the dogma EENS. There is no development with Vatican Council II.The pope was assuming that LG 16 etc refer to visible cases in the present times.He wrongly assumed that there were seen cases of persons saved with the baptism of desire or blood and in invincible ignorance, and without the baptism of water.So he concluded that the dogma EENS( Feeneyite) was no more relevant for our times.
5.Vatican Council II is Feeneyite. Similarly the Letter of the Holy Office ( first part), the Nicene Creed, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, can all be interpreted with the Feeneyite principle i.e there are no visible; no physically seen exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in the present times. De facto there cannot be exceptions to EENS as it was interpreted by Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston, the Church Fathers and Church Councils.This is the doctrinal scenario that the Vatican must accept before an agreement with the SSPX.
The SSPX must refuse to enter the Church with canonical status if Vatican Council II is interpreted with Cushingism.
They must agree to enter the Church with canonical status if Vatican Council II is interpreted by the magisterium with Feenyism.
The Vatican Curia must be reconciled with Catholic doctrine before the SSPX can be reconciled with them.