There is no denial from Michael Voris and the Download program.They criticized the Alpha program.It did not have a Catholic ecclesiology with Catholic doctrines they said.While they will not affirm Catholic doctrine on salvation theology and Vatican Council II.
I had mentioned in a blog post on EucharistandMission :-
1.The Dowload panel do not profess the Faith by saying there are no known cases of the baptism of desire in our reality for it to be an exception or relevant to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is something obvious.It is common sense. We cannot see or meet people on earth saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.CMTV agrees with me. They do not profess the Catholic Faith here.2.So CMTV does not state that there are no exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus and so the Holy Office 1949 and Pope Pius XII were wrong and Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center,traditionalists, were correct.For them there are exceptions. They agree with me. There is no denial here.
3.The Secretary to the Archbishop of Detroit will still demand on social media that Michael Voris publically affirm that there are known cases of the baptism of desire in 2016.He has to say that the Emperor is wearing clothes.He compromises.Michael Voris does not deny this.
4.The Archdiocese Secretary in Detroit who approves of the Alpha program, will say that there are known and explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted by St.Francis Xavier and the 16th century missionaries.Michael Voris agrees to remain in good standing with the liberal Archdiocese.This is a denial of Catholic doctrine with traditional theology.He does not deny this.
5.Dr.Robert Fastiggi and Dr.Mark Latkovic among others at the Theology Faculty of the Sacred Heart Seminary in Detroit are saying just this. They agree with the Archdiocese Curia.Michael Voris and the Download panel has to agree with this nonsense that is, there are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 2016.He agrees with all this. No denial from the Download panel.
5.Michael Voris has to repeat what is ridiculous.He does not deny this. How can he claim like the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 that hypothetical cases are not hypothetical but objective ? But he is suggesting this.
How can he claim that these allegedly objective cases are exceptions to all needing to be incorporated into the Catholic Church as members? Irrational but he will not deny it. He remains politically correct with the Left.
How could he as an adult and Catholic say something so ridiculous? Yet he does do so to protect his interests.
6.Michael Voris finds himself in the same position as those U.S bishops who do not want to deny the Faith,but now they are 'afraid of professing the Faith in all its glory.'The U.S bishops whom he criticizes are just like Michael Voris.They are following him.No denial here from CMTV.