Thursday, December 15, 2016


Image result for photos of Vatican Council II

It's unprecedented.Philosophical mistakes have been discovered in Vatican Council II which was unknown or unreported over the last 50 years.It has completely changed the understanding of the Council which was always traditional.
Image result for Logo of Crux
For the liberals this will be a big blow. So media like CRUX is not reporting on it.
It means Vatican Council II had a continuity all along with the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), which the main steam media calls the 'rigorist interpretation'.
The liberal interpretation of Vatican Council II could only be made with the philosophical error.This intepretation was made by assuming what is hypothetical is not hypothetical.Invisible cases were considered visible.The liberals' famous case of the catechumen who allegedly was known is really unknown.With this false premise(visible cases of the baptism of desire etc) a non traditional conclusion (there is known salvation outside the Church so the dogma has exceptions)was  created.
This non traditional and heretical conclusion in the interpretation of Vatican Council II was rejected by the traditionalists.However it was accepted by the magisterium, the liberals and the Left.
Now when religious are asked basic philosophical questions, they can see where it is leading to and they refuse to answer, or be quoted.Similarly at the pontifical universities and seminaries in Rome there are priest -professors who continue to teach a lie.Their interpretation of Vatican Council II, is based on the philosophical error.They maintain the error even after being informed.-Lionel Andrades

DECEMBER 15, 2016

Sedevacantist Bishop Donald Sanborn unaware of many philosophical errors in Vatican Council

DECEMBER 14, 2016

Catholic professors in Rome now tell lies : pontifical universities don't want to be quoted on a philosophical subject

DECEMBER 13, 2016


DECEMBER 13, 2016

Traditionalists too unaware of major philosophical mistake : many errors in Vatican Council II

DECEMBER 13, 2016

Too many mistakes in Vatican Council II

DECEMBER 12, 2016

Vatican Council II riddled with philosphical error : two popes in principle support objective error in text

 DECEMBER 11, 2016

The source of the present Arian-like heresy throughout the Church today is due to the following points

DECEMBER 10, 2016

The present magisterium has made a major philosophical mistake

DECEMBER 11, 2016

Priest confirms philosophical error : Lefebvre excommunication a mistake

 DECEMBER 10, 2016

Scholars supporting four cardinals in major philosophical mistake

DECEMBER 1, 2016

There is a mistake in Vatican Council II and once the error is identified and avoided, the interpretation of the Council radically changes.There is no 'spirit of Vatican Council II ' excuse anymore

NOVEMBER 29, 2016

So it is only by using an irrationality that the present magisterium can re-interpret magisterial documents and say Vatican Council II indicates all Jews and Muslims in Italy do not need to convert into the Catholic Church in 2016

 NOVEMBER 28, 2016

Yet it is with this reasoning that cardinals Ratzinger,Kasper and other liberals interpret Vatican Council II. They use an irrational premise to create a non traditional and heretical conclusion.They with their executive power in the Vatican, they call it magisterial

Inline image 1

NOVEMBER 23, 2016

The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate have set a precedent for all religious communities.They have announced that they accept Vatican Council II without Rahnerian theology.This is extra ordinary. Since they are not denying the Council and neither are they denying Tradition

NOVEMBER 21, 2016

Can the SSPX accept Vatican Council II like the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate to get canonical status ? : No one tells the pope that he is interpreting Vatican Council II with bad philosophy and bad theology which has now been exposed

Inline image 1

NOVEMBER 20, 2016

When we get rid of the Rahnerian theology to interpret Vatican Council II then Catholics in general can know the importance of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation : Feast of Christ the King

NOVEMBER 14, 2016

Don Francesco Riscossa has made an objective error. Lumen Gentium 8 refers to a hypothetical case and so it is not relevant or an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which he has cited in part one of the conference.

NOVEMBER 13, 2016

Don Allessandro Minutella does not deny it : there is no theology in Vatican Council II to contradict the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and an ecumenism of return, Vatican Council II is in accord with the Lefbrists and 'integralists' whom he criticizes in the video

NOVEMBER 8, 2016

Today the magisterium wants the SSPX to affirm Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases being objective in the present times and they are not doing so.Neither would I.

NOVEMBER 8, 2016

Once we avoid the new theology, with the irrational premise then the conclusion is traditional. We have the old ecclesiology and upon it we base the teaching on religious liberty, ecumenism and inter-religious dialogue

NOVEMBER 8, 2016

Once you have identified the new theology and avoided it,it is possible to view Vatican Council II in the light of Tradition. We would be back to the old ecclesiology at any Mass

NOVEMBER 7, 2016

Pope Benedict XVI was promoting the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition

No comments: