It's unprecedented.Philosophical mistakes have been discovered in Vatican Council II which was unknown or unreported over the last 50 years.It has completely changed the understanding of the Council which was always traditional.
For the liberals this will be a big blow. So media like CRUX is not reporting on it.
It means Vatican Council II had a continuity all along with the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), which the main steam media calls the 'rigorist interpretation'.
The liberal interpretation of Vatican Council II could only be made with the philosophical error.This intepretation was made by assuming what is hypothetical is not hypothetical.Invisible cases were considered visible.The liberals' famous case of the catechumen who allegedly was known is really unknown.With this false premise(visible cases of the baptism of desire etc) a non traditional conclusion (there is known salvation outside the Church so the dogma has exceptions)was created.
This non traditional and heretical conclusion in the interpretation of Vatican Council II was rejected by the traditionalists.However it was accepted by the magisterium, the liberals and the Left.
Now when religious are asked basic philosophical questions, they can see where it is leading to and they refuse to answer, or be quoted.Similarly at the pontifical universities and seminaries in Rome there are priest -professors who continue to teach a lie.Their interpretation of Vatican Council II, is based on the philosophical error.They maintain the error even after being informed.-Lionel Andrades