The present magisterium is teaching relativism and has an air of indifferentism when informed.Even Cardinal Burke is keeping quiet about this.1The two popes could suspend Cardinal Burke's faculties if he objects.As they can do so for any priest-pofessor at the now Masonic-pontifical universities in Rome. who speaks the truth.
Here is some of the relativism being taught by the Vatican Curia of liberals.
1.They assume that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to known cases instead of just being hypothetical and invisible. So this gives them an opportunity to eliminate the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is a doctrinal change.
It is pastorally enforced.If a Catholic Religious Superior affirms the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS, this means he or she is not assuming the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance refer, to only hypothetical cases.The religious will be suspended or penalised. A priest can be denied incardination.
This could be the reason why the blogger Fr.John Zuhlsdorf does not affirm the dogma EENS.He does not criticize inter-marriage with Jews.
It is not adultery for him.Nor does he say that all Jews and Orthodox Christians are on the way to Hell according to the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II.
Since this is expected of him by the present magisterium.
If a priest says he accepts the baptism of desire as it was taught by the past popes and saints it is not enough.It has to be a visible- for- us- baptism of desire.This is the ruse of the liberal theologians.
This could be the reason why the blogger Fr.John Zuhlsdorf does not affirm the dogma EENS.He does not criticize inter-marriage with Jews.
It is not adultery for him.Nor does he say that all Jews and Orthodox Christians are on the way to Hell according to the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II.
Since this is expected of him by the present magisterium.
If a priest says he accepts the baptism of desire as it was taught by the past popes and saints it is not enough.It has to be a visible- for- us- baptism of desire.This is the ruse of the liberal theologians.
2.Since there is known salvation outside the Church for the two popes Vatican Council II has to be interpreted as a rupture with Tradition.This is accepted in principle by the Vatican Curia.
It is also enforced in the Church.If a cardinal or parish priest would say truthfully that in Vatican Council II there are no exceptions mentioned to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS, he will be penalised. If he would say that LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases he would get a cautionary phone call from one of the auxiliary bishops in Rome, who is following the Jewish Left guidelines for the Catholic Church.
I interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with 'the rigorist interpretation' of the dogma EENS.For me there is no hermeneutic of rupture with Feeneyite EENS.
The cardinals and priests however have to maintain the official deception on Vatican Council II.
3.Since there is no known salvation outside the Church there is no objective basis for the New Theology of Rahner, Kung,Ratzinger and Kasper. Yet priests at the pontifical universities have to teach Rahnerian new theology on salvation.It is made obligatory.Also catechists and religion teachers have to accept the new theology,based on an irrational premise, which is there in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1995).It is there in CCC 1257 and 846 etc.It is also with this irrational new theology, the Catechism of the Catholic Church interprets Vatican Council II.So there is the hermeutic of rupture and it is official and 'magisterial'.
During the pontificate of Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict catechism teachers all over the world were ordered to teach the new theology.Any one not doing so would have to be reported to the local bishop.
Also seminarians were forbiddent to mention Hell in their homilies. This is all official. These were directives from the magisterium.
This is human error and it cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.How can a new theology be created on a false philosophy ? The false reasoning can even be detected by a non Catholic.
4.There is no scientific proof for Teilhardin theology.Yet it is being allowed by the pro-Masonic popes, to encourage New Age concepts including re-incarnation.It is a general rejection of Catholic dogma and doctrines.
5.There is a Department of the Theology Religions set up at the Gregorian Pontifical University, Rome. This is in contradiction of the teachings of Pope John Paul II. Pope John Paul II had asked Cardinal Ratzinger to issue a CDF Notification to Fr.Jacques Dupuis S.J on his book Towards a Christian Theology of Religious Pluralism.This is allowed by the 'magisterium' in 2016.It is a rupture with the past magisterium.
Again this cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.How can the Holy Spirit contradict the past magisterium, re-interpret Vatican Council II with an irrationality and discard a dogma on salvation? How can the Holy Spirit suggest that we can physically see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water but with the baptism of desire etc?
6.Now Mission is being conducted along with Orthodox Christians and Protestants.It is Jesus without the necessity of being a member of the Catholic Church for salvation.The other Christians are not told that they are outside the Church and need to be members for salvation.This is the new magisterium.It is deceit and we know from whom it comes.
7.In Amoris Laetitia they are changing traditional moral theology with the subjectivism used in salvation theology.
7.In Amoris Laetitia they are changing traditional moral theology with the subjectivism used in salvation theology.
This is the work of the Masons who support all things evil like homosexuality, abortion etc.This is the work of Satan with the cooperation of ecclesiastical masonry.
These are only some examples of the present magisterium teaching heresy and relativism. For political reasons there is also an air of indifferentism.It is being condoned by cardinals.
Catholics use the term magisterium loosely to signify that there is a continuity with the past.This is not true.
A few weeks back there was a talk by Fr.Garcia L.C at the Regina Apostolorum University,Rome. He mentioned the magisterium of Pope Francis and the magisterium of Pope Benedict.I think he too realizes that there is no more a continous magisterium with the 16th century missionaries.
Pope Benedict confirmed it a few months back. He said the dogma EENS was no more like it was in the 16th century. So it is official.There is a rupture with the past magisterium.The present magisterium officially supports this rupture with the teachings of the Holy Spirit.-Lionel Andrades
Pope Benedict confirmed it a few months back. He said the dogma EENS was no more like it was in the 16th century. So it is official.There is a rupture with the past magisterium.The present magisterium officially supports this rupture with the teachings of the Holy Spirit.-Lionel Andrades
1
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment