Saturday, February 18, 2017

Major news overlooked by Catholic media :Feeneyite-Cushingite model to interpret Vatican Council II, Catechism,EENS etc

Image result for Photo Hey this is big news
Coherence has now come into the Church. Order and harmony is there with Church-doctrine.Vatican Council II is in step with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).No rupture any more.No violation of the Principle of Non Contraduction.There is no jarr between the baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance(I.I) and the centuries old interpretation of EENS( Feeneyite).They are in step.The Syllabus of Errors, an ecumenism of return, the 16th century on the same band length as Vatican Council II with a new name : Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).This is good news. Headline News.This is Vatican Council II with a new look.There is a new end-result.It is rational ,as it was in the past.But I am the only one who writes or speaks about it, or seems to know about it.
Image result for Photo Hey this is big news
The Feeneyite-Cushingite model is not known on CMTV. Gloria TV, Remnant News...It is a breakthrough and they don't know about it.
Use it when Bishop Robert Barron's speaks on salvation.Tell him he's a Cushingite.Show him the alternative. Vatican Council II a break with Tradition is Cushingite or Feeneyite? The answer is easy.Cushingism leads to rupture.The Catechism of the Catholic Church and other Church documents can be read anew.Catholics already use the Feeneyite-Cushingite model.Their Cushingism is not Catholic. 
Cushingism is leftist ideology. It was a new way in 1949 to look at salvation, mission, ecclesiology, ecumenism, Social Reign of Christ the King etc.It is there with the liberals in New York.
Once Fr.Jonathan Morris a priest in the Archdiocese of New York said not every one needs to enter the Church for salvation. So Michael Voris quickly asked whom did he think did not have to enter. Fr. Morris should have said sorry.
But there was no saying-sorry for him.Instead it was Voris who said sorry.He followed up with his - not every one needs to be a card carrying member of the Church.
May be they told Michael that a  person can be saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.As if this happens every day.
This was when Voris should have brought out the Feeneyite-Cushingite model from his pocket.But it wasn't there.
It goes like this. Yes! We can interpret the baptism of desire(BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) in two ways. It is like the binary system of computers.You can decide. BOD and I.I are physically invisible or visible in 2017.In black or white. This is simple. It is Feeneyite(invisible) or Cushingite(visible).
It is the same with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It is as if you can turn the flap over.There are two ways of looking at it today.Though there is one way only in reality.There was only one way theologically in the past.Now most people take the wrong way.It is with the new theology.The blind magisterium leads them by the collar.
EENS is seen today as Feeneyite or Cushingite. EENS (Feeneyite) has no exceptions.There is invisible- for- us baptism of desire and invisible- for- us being saved in invincible ignorance.Invisible cases cannot be exceptions.
For Fr.Jonathan Morris and the Archdiocese of New York extra ecclesiam nulla salus is Cushingite.EENS( Cushingite) has exceptions.There is visible- for- us baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance( allegedly without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church).This is irrational but it is Catholic  for them.Visible for us baptism of desire!? This is their inference.
EENS Cushingism is an innovation.It came into the Church in a strong way in 1949-Boston.Then it was placed in Vatican Council II by Cardinal Cushing and his Jesuit friends.The text in Vatican Council II is Cushingite but it can also be read with Feeneyism.This gives us hope.Re-interpret Vatican Council II and cause a sensation.Change the premise and change the Church.Let being invisible just remain being invisible and watch how things right themself.
The liberals interpret LG 16( invincible ignorance), LG 14( case of the catechumen) as explicit and known cases.Visible ghosts. So they suppose that Vatican Council II is a rupture with Feeneyite EENS.  Vatican Council II becomes the death of the old ecclesiology.Sounds familiar? Yes, it is the mistake  of the traditionalists too.
Conservative Cardinal Ratzinger interpreted EENS and Vatican Council II with an irrationality and got away with it. He was the Prefect of the CDF. Redemptoris Missio refers to the 'ecclesiocentrism of the past'.He was quite clear on what he wanted to choose for the Church.Brazen in his error.
So there now is a new ecclesiology for Pope Benedict.It is dumped upon all of us. It is not the work of the Holy Spirit.Since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake. It is made up of EENS (Cushingite), Vatican Council II (Cushingite) and BOD and I.I (Cushingite).Bad fruit.
Dominus Iesus and Redemptoris Missio was written with Cushingism.This is the theology of Fr.Jonathan Morris.It is being taught at the North American Seminary in Rome.It is official at the Vatican.This is the only theology known to Cardinal Sarah too.
It is also the theology of Dr. Ralph Martin.His much quoted book was liked  by Cushingite Archbishop Augustine di Noia at Ecclesia Dei.
So when Pope  Benedict XVI says the SSPX must accept the doctrinal teachings of the Church he means it a la Cushingite.This point is always overlooked by CMTV when they criticize the SSPX on doctrine.
I can affirm all the doctrinal teachings of the Church - but with the Feeneyite model.Michael Voris could do the same.He can switch from Cushingism to Feeneyism.It is the same doctrine but the theology is Feeneyite.
The SSPX could also learn to switch.No one then can fault them for rejecting Vatican Council II or the dogma EENS.
So Michael Voris' question for Fr.Jonathan Moris was sound.It is based on the theological and doctrinal teachings of the Catholic Church interpreted with Feeneyism.But Michael didn't know it at that time.
Fr.Jonathan Moris, Ralph Martin and the faculty at the Sacred Heart Seminary, Detroit however could also say that they follow all the documents of the Church.True.It is here where Michael Voris should shout out 'Yes but with Cushingism.Cushingism is irrational.It is not logical''.
On a practical level, he could ask them where are the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible cases in Detroit in 2017? Downtown ? What are their names and where do they live? There are none! There are no practical exceptions.
Who knows of someone saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire in the past and without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church? No one. It was physically impossible to know who is in Heaven without the baptism of water in 1949 or 1965.You would have to go to Heaven and come back to earth to tell us about it.How can someone say St Emerentiana or St. Victor or the friend of St. Ambrose is in Heaven without the baptism of water? This would be speculation with good will. Secondly how can someone in the past be an exception to the dogma EENS in the present(2017)?
Yes, Fr.Jonathan Moris should have apologised.But his error would have to be explained to him with the Feeneyite-Cushingite model.Then he could understand.This model has changed our way of looking at Vatican Council II.
This is the stuff of world news.A news scoop.And no one is talking about it.Vatican Council II is no more an issue for the trads and sedes. It is past tense.But who will tell it to them ?
-Lionel Andrades

No comments: