The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate should protest and refuse to accept Vatican Council II (Cushingite) and instead they should affirm Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and ask Pope Francis and Cardinal Braz de Avez to do the same.It is not Catholic for the pope to force the Sisters to proclaim a lie; to use deception and so change the interpretation of Vatican Council II.Similarly it is not Catholic to reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) by claiming that there are physically known cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church, or that there are visible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, all without the baptism of water.
This is the error of Cushingism which Pope Pius XII overlooked in the Fr.Leonard Feeney case.Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits made this error official in the Archdiocese of Boston and then in Vatican Council II.
Now we have an interpretation of Vatican Council II with visible- for- us- baptism of desire (LG 14) or invisible- for- us baptism of desire (LG 14).With an irrational premise (there are invisible cases which are visible) or without it(invisible cases are always invisible) we can choose our interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Pope Francis and Cardinal Braz de Avez want the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate to choose the irrational, non traditional and heretical version, which suits the Masons.
This is a lie made official.It is magisterial heresy and the Sisters should publically reject it.
In public they have stated in the past , that they affirm Vatican Council II but they reject the Rahnerian version,common in the main line(leftist) Italian newspapers.
Excellent! This should continue to be their position.
Now fine-tune it, and announce the following or a variation of it. You are free to edit it. No permission from me is required :-
'We Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate affirm Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) in which hypothetical cases (LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc) are not visible and known in 2017 to be relevant or exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite).
'We reject the interpretation of Vatican Council II (Cushingite) by the two popes and Cardinal Braz de Avez since references to invisible cases in the Council text, cannot be visible exceptions to the dogma EENS(Feeneyite) which says all need to be incorporated into the Church as members for salvation.
'So we affirm Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) , the Catechism of the Catholic Church (Feeneyite) and the dogma EENS( Council of Florence 1441). We affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was known to St. Francis Xavier and St. Ignatius of Loyola and the 16th century missionaries and to the Church Fathers.This is explained in detail on the blog Eucharist and Mission (Lionel's blog).
'We call upon all Catholic religious to reject this lie and deception(invisible cases are visible exceptions to EENS) and affirm Vatican Council II without absurd and strange inferences like invisible people being visible, which the present magisterium promotes in a hermeneutic of rupture with the past magisterium'.
Or, simply say that they interpret Vatican Council II according to Lionel Andrades who is available to answer questions on the Internet.
The Sisters must understand that they do not have to reject Vatican Council II but only interpret it in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Remember Rahnerian theology is based upon invisible cases being visible, what is implicit and hidden is considered explicit, subjectivity is mistaken for objectivitly and hypothetical cases are considered de facto known.This was the objective and factual error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney.
The pope and the Left now want to suppress your community Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate but let it not be under the name of Vatican Council II.Oppose it.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment