Lay Conference in Rome on Saturday affirms philosophical subjectivism and Cushingite theology of Pope Benedict XVI
A Vatican expert is reporting on a conference for the laity seeking clarity on Pope Francis' post-synodal exhortation Amoris Laetitia. Marco Tosatti said Tuesday that the conference, to be held Saturday, April 22, at the Hotel Columbus in Rome, has gained criticism from local press, citing a headline referring to the organizers of the conference as "hardline Catholic rebels."
One of the spokesmen for the conference wrote, "In this respect it is right and necessary to reiterate that this will not be an act of public mutiny against the Pope nor will it place an ultimatum, let alone be the first step in a schismatic journey."
It was reported on Church Militant TV that the conference is featuring several speakers and presentations, including "The Need for Consistency of the Magisterium with Tradition: Examples in History" and "Indissolubility of Marriage: Good for Society."
SUPPORT POPE BENEDICT'S CUSHINGITE SALVATION AND MORAL THEOLOGY Speakers, sponsors and participants at this conference it may be mentioned, doctrinally support Pope Benedict XVI when he interprets Vatican Council II with the theology of Cushigism instead of Feeneyism.So he projects the Council as a rupture with Tradition, in particular the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite).
This is also the interpretation of Riccado Cascioli the Director of the magazine Il Timone and the media La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana in Italy.
La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana andIl Timonewho are hosting this event could also be supporting Pope Benedict when he interprets the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and so the dogma 'evolves' and is a rupture with the 16th century missionaries understanding of outside the Church there is no salvation. SUPPORT POPE BENEDICT'S PHILOSOPHICAL SUBJECTIVISM They also support Pope Benedict when he in principle supports philosophical subjectivism, in the interpretation of morals and salvation.For example this is their interpretation of Amoris Laetitia and the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance.It is assumed in both cases that there are physically visible and known exceptions.There are known exceptions among the divorced and remarried and there are known exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. SUPPORT THERE BEING KNOWN SALVATION OUTSIDE THE CHURCH. So they would support Pope Benedict when he stated that Jews do not need to convert into the Catholic Church in the present times for salvation.Since there is known salvation outside the Church for Pope Benedict. He has expressed this in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission, Christianity and the World Religions and The Hope of Salvation for Infants who have not been baptised.This was also the theology he approved at Vatican Council II and in his Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995). SUPPORT POPE BENEDICT'S NEW ECUMENISM AND CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY OF RELIGIOUS PLURALISM They would also support the new ecumenism and the Christian Theology of Religious Pluralism ( Christianity and the World Religions, International Theological Commission, Vatican) since subjectively there is known salvation outside the visible boundaries of the Church; outside 'faith and baptism'.Similarly there are known exceptions to giving the Eucharist to divorcees living in manifest mortal sin.They can judge who among the re-married and divorced will not go to Hell if they die immediately.
SUPPORT ASSISI INTER FAITH MEETINGS AND POPE BENEDICT NOT BEING WILLING TO SAY ALL NON CATHOLICS NEED TO CONVERT TO AVOID THE FIRES OF HELL. They would also support the Assisi inter-faith meetings since like Pope Benedict the conference speakers and organisers would not be willing to say that all Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, Muslims, Christians, atheists and others in general need to formally enter the Catholic Church with 'faith and baptism' to avoid the fires of Hell'.This would be the normal theology with Feeneyism( invisible cases are not visible) which they do not subscribe to. THEY REJECT MISSION BASED ON THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS(FEENEYITE) They would also support Pope Benedict when he does not affirm mission based on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which indicates all non Catholics in general are on the way to Hell and not only those who know about Jesus and the Church and do not enter. 'Those who know or those who are in invincible ignorance' is Cushingite reasoning.It is the Cushingite interpretation of the dogma in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, the Baltimore Catechism( Revised version), Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995) and other documents approved by Pope Benedict, when he was the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. APPROVE JOINT MISSION PROGRAMS WITH OTHER CHRISTIANS Riccardo Cascioli and the conference speakers would also appove of joint mission programs with other Christian churches and communities,it seems, since they too interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and all other magisterial documents with the Cushingite principle.It is part of the new moral theology and in Amoris Laetitia in particular, as it is part of the new salvation theology, Cushingite theology, approved in 1949. CUSHINGITE PRINCIPLE NOT A PROBLEM FOR RICCARDO CASCIOLI The conference does not consider the Cushingite principle a problem. It assumes invisible cases are visible, unknown factors are known, un-judgeable cases capable of being judged.So it could be inferred that there are exceptions to the general de fide teachings on morals and salvation.They do not consider this an error but support Pope Benedict in his acceptance of Cushingism (subjectve philosophy).They welcome Cushingism in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.They also welcome Cushingism ( invisible cases are visible in salvation and persons in mortal sin will be saved in morals), in Amoris Laetitia, which Pope Benedict XVI does not criticize and which he probaly vetted before it was made public.-Lionel Andrades
APRIL 19, 2017
Pope Benedict XVI could have interpreted Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in March 2016 with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism: he chose heresy and the hermeneutic of rupture